Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Compounding GLP-1 Drugs - Recent Updates

Client Alert

More individuals are utilizing weight loss medication than ever before. With the rise in usage, providers must be aware of when, how, and why they are able to prescribe or create compounded GLP-1 drugs.       

Recent guidance from the Ohio Board of Pharmacy (“BOP”) indicates that providers should generally use the FDA approved GLP-1 drug, rather than a non-FDA approved compounded version of the medication. Importantly, if a GLP-1 drug is commercially available, it cannot be copied through compounding. Currently, compounded copies of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide are not permitted.  

There are two exceptions that allow a provider to compound a GLP-1 drug: (1) if the drug is not commercially available, and (2) if the compounded drug “includes a change, made for an identified individual patient, which produces for that patient a significant difference, as determined by the prescribing practitioner, between the compounded drug and the commercially available product.” The identified change must be documented appropriately on the prescription or order.

The BOP also prohibits a provider from using certain ingredients in compounding. For example, Retatrutide and Cagrilintide are not permitted to be used in compounding. In addition, providers cannot use salt forms when compounding GLP-1 drugs. 

While compounded GLP-1 drugs do serve a purpose, such as serving an individualized patient need, the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has stated its concern with using any non-FDA approved GLP-1 drug. According to the FDA, one of the potential concerns is that the compounded drug may contain the incorrect amount of an active ingredient, leading to adverse effects. If using a compounded GLP-1 medication, providers will want to ensure that they are creating and storing the compounded drugs correctly, that they are not utilizing drugs labeled “for research purposes only,” and that any active ingredients purchased are from an FDA registered and Ohio licensed distributor.

To learn more about how drug compounding regulations can impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001. 


Corporate Transparency Act: Business Owners Must Act Now

The Corporate Transparency Act requires all reporting companies to file their Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) report by year-end to avoid penalties. Companies formed before January 1, 2024, have less than six months to comply. Learn more in a client alert by BMD Member Blake Gerney.

New Medicare Billing Rules: What MFTs, MHCs, and IOP Providers Need to Know

Starting January 1, 2024, Medicare began covering services provided to Medicare beneficiaries by marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) services. With this change, Medicare has become the primary payer for these services.

Chevron Doctrine No More: What the Supreme Court’s Ruling Means for Agency Authority

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court invalidated the Chevron doctrine, nearly 40 years after it first took effect.

Ohio Board of Pharmacy Update: Key Regulatory Changes and Proposals You Need to Know

The Ohio Board of Pharmacy (BOP) has rescinded certain OAC rules (OAC 4729:5-18-01 through 4729:5-18-06), removing regulations on office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) clinics. The rescissions took effect on June 3, 2024. The BOP also published a new rule, OAC 4729:8-5-01, which sets explicit reporting guidelines for licensed dispensaries and became effective on June 7, 2024.

LGBTQIA+ Patients and Discrimination in Healthcare

In early April, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a study outlining the challenges that LGBT adults face in the United States related to healthcare. According to the study, LGBT patients are “twice as likely as non-LGBT adults to report negative experiences while receiving health care in the last three years, including being treated unfairly or with disrespect (33% v. 15%) or having at least one of several other negative experiences with a provider (61% v. 31%), including a provider assuming something about them without asking, suggesting they were personally to blame for a health problem, ignoring a direct request or question, or refusing to prescribe needed pain medication.”