Client Alerts, News Articles & Blog Posts

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio Supreme Court Liquidated Damages Analysis: Hindsight is not 2020!

In a case decided on February 24, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court construed the enforceability of a liquidated damages provision in a public works construction contract. The Court held that when evaluating the enforceability of a liquidated damages provision in a construction contract, the court must conduct its analysis prospectively, based on the per diem amount of the liquidated damages at the time the contract is executed, and not retrospectively, based on the total amount of liquidated damages that ultimately accrue.

In reversing the Court of Appeals, the Ohio Supreme Court determined that the mere fact that the liquidated damages totaled $277,900 (calculated at $700 per day times 397 days late) did not result in a finding that the amount of liquidated damages was unreasonable where the base contract amount was $683,300. The flaw in the Court of Appeals reasoning was that it applied a retrospective analysis using hindsight. The long-standing test in Ohio requires the analysis to be considered at the time the parties entered into the contract.

The Ohio Supreme Court also held that “liquidated damages are not deemed a penalty simply because a project consists of new construction of an improvement that did not exist previously and no proof of damages is required to enforce liquidated damages pursuant to such a contract.”

This decision also includes an interesting overview of the Samson Sales tripartite test for distinguishing between an unenforceable penalty clause and a valid liquidated damages clause.

To read the Slip Op. No. 2016-Ohio-628, Boone Coleman Constr., Inc., v. Piketon, visit: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2016/2016-Ohio-628.pdf

Should you wish to consult with the author of this article, please feel free to contact Attorney Robert A. Hager at (330) 253–4925.

Daphne Saneholtz Discusses ACA Repeal and Effects on Ohioans

The latest roadblock in efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act has many Ohioans living with HIV and AIDS relieved, but still concerned about what's next.

New Akron Legislation Aims to Increase Income Tax Revenue Through Construction Contractor Registrations

The City of Akron recently passed three new pieces of legislation aimed at boosting city coffers by requiring contractors to take additional steps prior to performing work in the city.

BMD Recognized for Health Law Practice

“Ever since its founding in 2000, attorneys at Brennan, Manna & Diamond have focused on offering a full range of services to all the firm’s clients, including developing industry-specific practice areas like healthcare,” said Matt Heinle, co-managing partner at the firm.

Defining Concierge and Boutique Medicine

Amanda L. Waesch, Partner at Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC, Akron, Ohio, shared with the Stark County Medical Society Membership alternative physician practice structures, pros and cons of each structure, and the differences between Institutional Providers and Concierge Medicine.

How artificial intelligence relates to the legal profession

Legal research has changed. An attorney who started his career dredging through books can now instantly consult vast databases, saving countless man hours. Soon, however, it may need not involve the man at all.