Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

340C – Prospective Legislation to Protect Federally Qualified Health Centers

Client Alert
November 14, 2022

Advocates for Community Health (ACH), an organization created to implement policy and advocacy initiatives for health care systems across the United States, has begun drafting legislation that is geared towards protecting Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”) enrolled in the 340B Program, which is being dubbed “340C.”

The 340C program would be a separate drug discount program just for FQHCs and perhaps other entities such as rural hospitals and federal grantees like Ryan White Clinics as well. According to ACH: “[o]ur members and leadership came to the decision that health centers and the patients they serve must be protected as reforms to the 340B program are under consideration.”[1] The move seems aimed at distinguishing FQHCs and perhaps other federal grantees from hospitals that currently participate in the 340B program and that have drawn the criticism of some lawmakers.

The main goal of ACH is for funds from the 340B program to be reinvested into FQHCs to fully benefit the patients and communities they serve, as the program was originally intended. However, with 340B reform underway on the federal and state levels, ACH wants to make sure FQHCs are protected; “There is no defensible reason to sweep FQHCs into the ‘reform’ of the 340B program, particularly given that health centers are already required to reinvest any program revenue into patient services.”[2]

In particular, ACH lists three policy recommendations specific to FQHCs:

  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) should update its 2016 outpatient drug rule to clarify that states are permitted to reimburse above actual acquisition cost under fee for service Medicaid for drugs purchased under the 340B program at FQHCs, and provide a federal floor that supersedes state policy.
  • In order to preserve the essential savings provided by the 340B program, CMS and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) must protect FQHCs against actual acquisition cost and/or forced carve-out policies within Medicaid managed care arrangements.
  • HRSA should establish additional requirements around entity burden reduction before approving manufacturer audits of FQHCs.[3]

When and if the legislation is introduced to Congress, we will update this Alert with more specifics as to what exactly the “340C” Program will entail.

If you have any questions about the 340B Program, please reach out to healthcare attorney, Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com.

[1] Rita Rey, ACH Stands up to Defend the 340B Program for Health Centers, (Oct. 7, 2022) https://advocatesforcommunityhealth.org/ach-stands-up-to-defend-the-340b-program-for-health-centers/. 

[2] Id.

[3] Advocates for Community Health, “340B Policy Principles & Priorities,” https://advocatesforcommunityhealth.org/policy-advocacy/340b/.

Health LawHealthcare Policy
Client Alert

What Inpatient Behavioral Health Providers Need to Know About ODM's New Draft Rule for Reimbursements

November 8, 2023Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) recently released a draft rule that will transform how inpatient behavioral health services are reimbursed for some hospitals. ODM will migrate inpatient payments for behavioral health and substance use disorder services (BH/SUD) provided by freestanding psychiatric hospitals (FSPs) from the APR-DRG payment methodology to a per diem payment methodology derived from the APR-DRG system.Press Release, Client Alert

BMD Named to the 2024 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms”

November 2, 2023Brennan Manna & Diamond (BMD) is recognized among the leading law firms in the nation according to the 2024 Edition of U.S. News – Best Lawyers®  "Best Law Firms." The firm has ranked in in 13 practice areas and has earned “National Tier 1” rankings in Health Care Law and Litigation-Trusts & Estates.Client Alert

Friendly Physician Models: The Basics Through 5 Frequently Asked Questions

October 27, 2023During the past several years, many health law practices have noticed a dramatic increase in the number of telehealth businesses and private equity backed health care providers. Both of these trends often rely heavily on corporate structures commonly referred to as “friendly physician,” “captive PC” or “MSO” models. Although friendly physician models are used by non-physician health care providers (e.g., physical therapists, psychologists, and dentists), this article focuses on physicians and how the model is used in connection with the provision of professional medical services.Client Alert

The DOL and EEOC Enter a Partnership to Strengthen Federal Employment Law Enforcement

October 23, 2023On September 13, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to work together in enforcing federal employment laws. The MOU forms a partnership between the two agencies to encourage coordination through information sharing, joint investigations, training, and outreach.Client Alert

Proposed Laboratory Arrangement Draws Heightened Scrutiny from the OIG

October 18, 2023On September 25, 2023, the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) issued Advisory Opinion 23-06 (AO). The Opinion involved a proposed arrangement between an independent laboratory and other physician laboratories for the purchase of the technical component of anatomic pathology services. The OIG ultimately concluded that the arrangement at issue, if it was entered into with the requisite intent, would implicate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and constitute grounds for sanctions.
Older posts
Newer posts