Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

AAA Introduces AI-Assisted Arbitrator for Certain Disputes

Client Alert
April 7, 2026

The American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) recently introduced an AI-assisted arbitration platform known as the “AI Arbitrator.” The technology is designed to help streamline arbitration, particularly in two-party, documents-only construction disputes, by using artificial intelligence to analyze filings, summarize evidence, and generate draft decisions for a human arbitrator to review.

Under the AAA’s framework, AI does not replace the arbitrator; rather, it assists with reviewing submissions, identifying claims and issues, summarizing evidence, and preparing a proposed award. A human AAA arbitrator reviews, revises if necessary, and ultimately issues the final binding decision.

The platform reflects a broader effort within the ADR community to reduce costs and improve efficiency in high-volume disputes. Early AAA estimates suggest AI-assisted arbitration may resolve cases 20-25% faster and reduce costs by roughly 35% or more in certain document-based cases.

Potential Advantages

Organizations considering arbitration clauses that incorporate AI-assisted processes should evaluate several potential benefits:

  • Cost savings and efficiency: Automated analysis of pleadings and exhibits may significantly reduce the time required for case review and award drafting.
  • Faster dispute resolution: Streamlined workflows can shorten the time from filing to award in straightforward cases.
  • Improved analytical consistency: AI tools can systematically organize claims, evidence, and legal authorities, potentially improving clarity for arbitrators and parties.
  • Strategic insights before filing: AAA has also developed tools such as a “Resolution Simulator,” which can model how an arbitrator might analyze a dispute to help parties assess risk before initiating arbitration.

Potential Risks & Considerations

Despite these advantages, companies should carefully consider potential limitations before agreeing to AI-assisted arbitration:

  • Transparency concerns: Parties may not have full visibility into how AI analyzes issues or drafts its recommendations.
  • Reliance on emerging technology: AI systems may carry risks of bias, errors, or incomplete analysis if not carefully supervised.
  • Limited applicability: The current platform is designed primarily for documents-only disputes, meaning more complex matters involving live witness testimony may not be appropriate.
  • Contractual implications: Because the process is opt-in, arbitration clauses must specifically allow for AI-assisted arbitration if parties wish to use it.

Takeaway

AI-assisted arbitration represents a notable development in alternative dispute resolution. While it may offer meaningful efficiency and cost benefits – particularly for straightforward, document-based commercial disputes – companies should carefully consider whether the process aligns with their dispute resolution strategy, risk tolerance, and existing contractual provisions before electing to use it.

If you have questions about incorporating AI-assisted arbitration into dispute resolution clauses or evaluating its use in a pending dispute, please contact BMD Partner Krista Osterfeld at kwosterfeld@bmdllc.com.

AIArtificial IntelligenceArbitrationKrista Osterfeld
Client Alert

The Risks of Outsourcing Medical Billing and the Importance of State-Law Compliance

June 24, 2026Offshoring medical billing and other administrative functions can reduce costs, but it also raises significant compliance, operational, and contractual risks. Although HIPAA does not explicitly prohibit protected health information from being accessed or stored outside the United States, healthcare providers and their vendors remain responsible for safeguarding patient information and complying with state-specific restrictions that may limit or prohibit offshore subcontracting.Client Alert

Risks of Using AI-Generated, Implied Celebrity Endorsements in Advertising

June 3, 2026Businesses using AI-generated celebrity images, videos, or voice simulations in advertising may face significant legal risks if the content falsely implies an endorsement, affiliation, or sponsorship. This article discusses potential exposure under false advertising, right of publicity, consumer protection, and professional conduct laws, and explains why disclaimers may not be enough to avoid liability.Client Alert

CMS Requires Providers to Use an Updated Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) Form by May 12, 2026

May 22, 2026CMS has released an updated Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN), Form CMS-R-131, that all providers and suppliers must begin using by May 12, 2026. The revised form includes clearer language and formatting updates intended to improve patient understanding and compliance.Client Alert

CMS and Ohio Ramp Up Fraud Enforcement in Home Health and Hospice

May 15, 2026CMS and Ohio have launched sweeping new fraud prevention initiatives targeting home health and hospice providers, signaling a period of heightened scrutiny for enrollment, billing, documentation, and EVV compliance. While aimed at combating fraud, these measures also create significant operational and due process risks for compliant agencies, making proactive compliance programs, auditing, and governance more important than ever.Client Alert

MYTH BUSTER: Can a New Chiropractor Bill Under An Established Chiropractor’s NPI?

May 14, 2026Many chiropractic practices mistakenly believe a newly hired chiropractor can bill under an established chiropractor’s NPI while waiting for credentialing approval. In most cases, this is not permitted. Claims should be submitted under the NPI of the chiropractor who actually rendered the service to avoid compliance risks, including potential False Claims Act exposure. This article outlines key billing rules, common exceptions, and practical compliance tips for chiropractic practices.
Older posts