Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Chemical Dependency Professionals Board Rule Changes: Part 2

Client Alert

The below rule changes are effective on April 1, 2024. For questions about these rules, contact BMD attorney Daphne Kackloudis.

Requirements for Certification of Chemical Dependency Counselor Assistants (CDCA) - OAC 4758-5-01

Now, under the amended rule, a certified chemical dependency counselor assistant (CDCA) will be certified for a preliminary, non-renewable thirteen-month period if they meet the requirements under this rule. Specifically, an applicant must (1) be eighteen (18) years old and hold a high school diploma or equivalent and (2) submit a formal application, pay an application fee, and provide a personal attestation statement agreeing to practice by the code of ethical standards adopted by the board. Additionally, the applicant must now complete forty (40) hours of approved substance use disorder specific education in the topics set by the board.

Scope of Practice for Chemical Dependency Counselor Assistants (CDCA) - OAC 4758-6-01

Under the rule, a chemical dependency counselor assistant (CDCA) can provide family counseling within their scope of practice in addition to treatment planning, assessment, crisis intervention, individual counseling, group counseling, case management, and education services. Previously, a CDCA could not provide family counseling to their patients.

Code of Ethics for Chemical Dependency Counselors - OAC 4758-8-01

The amended rule sets forth the minimum standards of practice for certified chemical dependency counselor assistants (CDCA), licensed chemical dependency counselors II (LCDCII), licensed chemical dependency counselors III (LCDCIII), licensed independent chemical dependency counselors (LICDC), licensed independent chemical dependency counselors-clinical supervisors (LICDC-CS), and those licensees who carry the gambling disorder endorsement.

Specifically, licensees or certificate holders should never discriminate against clients on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, religion, age, national ancestry, genetic information, parental status, military status, socioeconomic status, political belief, psychiatric or psychological conditions, and disability, the amount of previous therapeutic or treatment occurrences, or against other persons that could be subject to discrimination but are not expressly protected by state or federal law. The amended rule adds gender identity or expression, genetic information, parental status, and military status as protected categories.

Further, the amended rule adds language imposing an obligation on licensees or certificate holders to protect the clients’ right to confidentiality. The amended rule says that confidential information may only be revealed to others when the clients, or other persons legally authorized to give consent on the behalf of the clients, have given their informed and written consent, unless there is a serious and current or imminent threat of harm to the client of others or as otherwise authorized by law.

The amended rule also states that licensees or certificate holders should maintain objective and non-possessive relationships with clients and not maintain a conflict of interest with any client, former client, family member of a client or a former client, or other person encountered in professional or non-professional settings, which may impair professional judgment, increase the risk of exploitation, or not be in the best interest of a client at any time.

Under the amended rule, a license or certificate holder is prohibited from engaging in any type of sexual conduct or sexual relationship with a current client and should never provide services to anyone in which they have had a prior sexual relationship. Additionally, a licensee or certificate holder is prohibited from having a sexual relationship or any form of sexual conduct with a former client within the two (2) years, at a minimum, following the termination of professional services. However, a licensee or certificate holder should never have a sexual relationship with a former client if such relationship is not in the best interest of the client or increases the risk of exploitation. Sexual conduct is any consensual or non-consensual contact with another person that a reasonable person may consider sexual or sexual in nature, including but not limited to: sexual relationship; sexual advance; sexual solicitation; request for a sexual favor; a text, picture, or video or social media post of a sexual nature; or any other verbal, non-verbal, or physical activity, contact, or conduct that is sexual or sexual in nature.

Further, under the amended rule, a licensee or certificate holder is explicitly prohibited from sexually harassing a client, or they risk the revocation of their license or certificate. Sexual harassment includes any activity, contact, or conduct that a reasonable person may consider offensive or harassing that is sexual or sexual in nature, including but not limited to: sexual advance; sexual solicitation; request for a sexual favor; a text, picture, or video or social media post of a sexual nature; or any other verbal, non-verbal, or physical activity, contact, or conduct that is sexually offensive or harassing.

Importantly, this amended rule now applies to licensees or certificate holders employed to work in any capacity in recovery housing. Residents in recovery housing are considered clients of the licensee or certificate holder.

Code of Ethics for Clinical Supervisors - OAC 4758-8-02

The purpose of this rule is to state the rules of conduct that apply to individuals who hold a valid independent chemical dependency counselor-clinical supervisor license (LICDC-CS), independent chemical dependency counselor license (LICDC) or chemical dependency counselor III license (LCDC III) during the performance of their clinical duties as supervisors.

The amended rule adds the requirement that supervision be maintained through regular face-to-face meetings, which could include video conferencing, with a supervisee or supervisees in group or individual sessions. Sessions should also include documentation of the content of the session, which should be signed by both the supervisor and supervisee if required by certifying or accrediting bodies.

Further, the amended rule adds language that supervision must be provided in a professional and consistent manner to all supervisees regardless of age, race, ethnicity, color, sex, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, religion, genetic information, parental status, military status, physical disability, sexual orientation, political affiliation or belief, marital or social or economic socioeconomic status, psychiatric or psychological conditions, disability, or other identifying traits that could subject an individual to discrimination but are not expressly protected by state or federal law.

Please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com with any questions.


Parental Consent May Soon Be Required for Minor Mental Health Services in Ohio

HB 172 proposes repealing a provision in Ohio law that allows minors age 14 and older to consent to limited outpatient mental health services without parental involvement. The bill would require parental consent for all such care and remove related language from other sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

Community Behavioral Health Providers - Supervisor Pricing Changes Begin July 1 [Corrected Date]

Effective June 16, community behavioral health providers wishing to receive reimbursement at the supervisor rate must add the HP or HT Modifier to fee-for-service (FFS) claims. Find out about the new guidelines.

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.