Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Client Alert: AAA Introduces AI-Assisted Arbitrator for Certain Disputes

Client Alert
April 7, 2026

The American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) recently introduced an AI-assisted arbitration platform known as the “AI Arbitrator.” The technology is designed to help streamline arbitration, particularly in two-party, documents-only construction disputes, by using artificial intelligence to analyze filings, summarize evidence, and generate draft decisions for a human arbitrator to review.

Under the AAA’s framework, AI does not replace the arbitrator; rather, it assists with reviewing submissions, identifying claims and issues, summarizing evidence, and preparing a proposed award. A human AAA arbitrator reviews, revises if necessary, and ultimately issues the final binding decision.

The platform reflects a broader effort within the ADR community to reduce costs and improve efficiency in high-volume disputes. Early AAA estimates suggest AI-assisted arbitration may resolve cases 20-25% faster and reduce costs by roughly 35% or more in certain document-based cases.

Potential Advantages

Organizations considering arbitration clauses that incorporate AI-assisted processes should evaluate several potential benefits:

  • Cost savings and efficiency: Automated analysis of pleadings and exhibits may significantly reduce the time required for case review and award drafting.
  • Faster dispute resolution: Streamlined workflows can shorten the time from filing to award in straightforward cases.
  • Improved analytical consistency: AI tools can systematically organize claims, evidence, and legal authorities, potentially improving clarity for arbitrators and parties.
  • Strategic insights before filing: AAA has also developed tools such as a “Resolution Simulator,” which can model how an arbitrator might analyze a dispute to help parties assess risk before initiating arbitration.

Potential Risks & Considerations

Despite these advantages, companies should carefully consider potential limitations before agreeing to AI-assisted arbitration:

  • Transparency concerns: Parties may not have full visibility into how AI analyzes issues or drafts its recommendations.
  • Reliance on emerging technology: AI systems may carry risks of bias, errors, or incomplete analysis if not carefully supervised.
  • Limited applicability: The current platform is designed primarily for documents-only disputes, meaning more complex matters involving live witness testimony may not be appropriate.
  • Contractual implications: Because the process is opt-in, arbitration clauses must specifically allow for AI-assisted arbitration if parties wish to use it.

Takeaway

AI-assisted arbitration represents a notable development in alternative dispute resolution. While it may offer meaningful efficiency and cost benefits – particularly for straightforward, document-based commercial disputes – companies should carefully consider whether the process aligns with their dispute resolution strategy, risk tolerance, and existing contractual provisions before electing to use it.

If you have questions about incorporating AI-assisted arbitration into dispute resolution clauses or evaluating its use in a pending dispute, please contact BMD Partner Krista Osterfeld at kwosterfeld@bmdllc.com.

AIArtificial IntelligenceArbitrationKrista Osterfeld
Client Alert

First-of-Its-Kind Federal Ruling Finds Use of Consumer AI Tool May Destroy Attorney-Client Privilege

February 17, 2026On February 10, 2026, Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a first-of-its-kind ruling finding that documents generated by a criminal defendant using a consumer AI platform were not protected by attorney-client privilege after being shared with counsel. The court treated the AI tool as a third party, concluding that entering sensitive information into a publicly available platform may waive confidentiality. The ruling also suggests that the work product doctrine may not apply where AI-generated materials are created independently by a client rather than at counsel’s direction. The decision signals that parties should exercise caution when using consumer AI tools in connection with legal matters.Client Alert

Your Golden Chance for H-1B Lottery Registration - March 2026

February 16, 2026USCIS H-1B registration opens March 4–19, 2026. U.S.-based employees on valid nonimmigrant status are exempt from the $100,000 fee for change of status petitions. The new weighted lottery favors higher-skilled and higher-paid employees, improving odds for advanced degree holders and Wage Level 3 or 4 workers.Client Alert

Invisible Algorithms: The Hidden Role of Artificial Intelligence in USCIS Immigration Processing

February 10, 2026The Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that artificial intelligence and machine learning tools are now integrated into numerous operational functions within U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). These tools are described as mechanisms to improve efficiency, reduce backlogs, and assist officers in managing an unprecedented volume of applications. DHS emphasizes that human adjudicators retain decision-making authority and that AI systems do not independently grant or deny immigration benefits. Find out how AI affects the U.S. immigration process.Client Alert

OAAPN | Year In Review: 2026 Ohio Board of Nursing and Ohio Law Rules

February 9, 2026Find out key changes to Ohio law and the Ohio Board of Nursing rules that have directly impacted APRN practice over the past year, including Psychiatric Inpatient Documents, Intimate Examinations, Signature Authority, Duties Related to Fetal Death, Retail IV Therapy Clinics, Release from Permanent Restrictions, Disciplinary Action, Course on Drugs and Prescriptive Authority, Overdose Reversal Drugs, Office Based Opioid Treatment, Withdrawal Management for Substance Use Disorder, Safe Haven Program, and more.Client Alert

Ohio House Bill 537: Proposed Regulations for Midwives and Birthing Centers

January 28, 2026House Bill 537, introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives, proposes a comprehensive regulatory framework for certified nurse-midwives, certified midwives, licensed midwives, and traditional midwives. The legislation would clarify scope of practice, establish licensure standards, and impose new requirements for freestanding birthing centers and home births. Healthcare providers and facilities should be aware of the proposed changes and their potential operational impact.
Older posts
Newer posts