Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

DEA and HHS Issue its Third Extension of Telemedicine Flexibilities through 2025

Client Alert
December 2, 2024

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) together with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has extended telemedicine flexibilities for the prescribing of controlled medication through December 31, 2025.

Prior to telemedicine flexibilities, the Ryan Haight Act required that a prescribing provider could only prescribe controlled medications to patients whom they had evaluated in-person. The DEA made temporary exceptions to this Act in 2020 in response to COVID-19, granting prescribing providers the authority to prescribe Schedule II-V controlled medications from a telemedicine evaluation alone. However, these prescriptions still had to comply with the requirements outlined in the DEA guidance documents, DEA regulations, and applicable Federal and State laws.

The DEA received more than 38,000 comments in response to its set of proposed telemedicine rules in March 2023 and held two days of listening sessions as a result. This feedback prompted the DEA and HHS to ultimately extend the current telemedicine flexibilities through the end of 2024. While the two agencies continue working to issue a final set of telemedicine regulations, they decided to extend telemedicine flexibilities for a third time through December 31, 2025.

This extension benefits both patients and providers by ensuring expanded patient access to these prescriptions and allowing sufficient time for providers to become compliant with any new standards that may eventually appear in the final set of regulations.

If you have questions about the DEA and HHS’s decision to issue a third extension of telemedicine flexibilities, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

HHSDEAtelemedicinetelehealth
Client Alert

Enhancing Privacy Protections for Substance Use Disorder Patient Records

February 16, 2024On February 8, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) finalized updated rules to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) for the protection of Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) patient records. The updated rules reflect the requirement that the Part 2 rules be more closely aligned with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) privacy, breach notification, and enforcement rules as mandated by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020.Client Alert

Columbus, Ohio Ordinance Prohibits Employers from Inquiries into an Applicant’s Salary History

January 30, 2024Effective March 1, 2024, Columbus employers are prohibited from inquiring into an applicant’s salary history. Specifically, the ordinance provides that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice to:Client Alert

The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board’s Latest Batch of Rules: What Providers Should Know

January 26, 2024The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board has introduced new rules and amendments, covering various aspects such as CDCA certificate requirements, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, remote supervision, and reciprocity application requirements. Notable changes include revised criteria for obtaining a CDCA certification, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, and updated ethical obligations for licensees and certificate holders, including non-discrimination, confidentiality, and anti-sexual harassment measures.Client Alert

Governor Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University Introduce the SOAR Study on Ohio Mental Illness

January 22, 2024On January 19, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University announced a new research initiative, the State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (“SOAR”) study, which will investigate all factors influencing Ohio’s mental illness and addiction epidemic.Client Alert

CHANGING TIDES: Summary and Effects of Burnett et. al. v. National Ass’n of Realtors, et. al.

January 17, 2024In April 2019, a class-action Complaint was filed in federal court for the Western District Court for Missouri arguing that the traditional payment agreements employed by many across the United States amounted to conspiracy resulting in the artificial increase in brokerage commissions. Plaintiffs, a class-action group comprised of sellers, argued that they paid excessive brokerage commissions upon the sale of their home as a result of the customary payment structure where Sellers agree to pay the full commission on the sale of their property, with Seller’s agent notating the portion of commission they are willing to pay to a Buyer’s agent at closing on the MLS or other similar system.
Older posts
Newer posts