Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Department of Education Proposes Redefinition of “Professional Degree,” Excluding Nursing and Limiting Graduate Loan Borrowing

Client Alert

In response to President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the U.S. Department of Education (the Department) recently announced several federal student-loan related changes, including redefining what the Department considers to be a “professional degree”. Nursing is one of several degrees excluded from the list.

The Department issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for “Reimagining and Improving Student Education” on January 30, 2026. The public is invited to submit comments on the proposed rules by March 2, 2026. 

The professional degrees recognized under OBBBA are as follows:

  • Pharmacy (Pharm.D.)
  • Dentistry (D.D.S. or D.M.D.)
  • Veterinary Medicine (D.V.M.)
  • Chiropractic (D.C. or D.C.M.)
  • Law (L.L.B. or J.D.)
  • Medicine (M.D.)
  • Optometry (O.D.)
  • Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.)
  • Podiatry (D.P.M., D.P., or Pod.D.)
  • Theology (M.Div., or M.H.L.)

The Department also seeks to eliminate the Grad PLUS program that currently affords graduate students the ability to borrow up to the full cost of attendance. Students in professional degree programs will be limited to borrowing $50,000 per year with up to $200,000 over their lifetimes. Meanwhile, for students in graduate programs not deemed to be a “professional degree” program, the borrowing limits will be $20,500 per year with a $100,000 lifetime cap.

The Under Secretary of Education, Nicholas Kent, stated the proposed changes “will help drive a sea of change in higher education by holding universities accountable for outcomes and putting significant downward pressure on the cost of tuition.” Further, Under Secretary Kent believes “[t]his will benefit borrowers who will no longer be pushed into insurmountable debt to finance degrees that do not pay off.”

If you would like assistance drafting comments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed changes, or you want to learn more about how the borrowing restrictions may impact you, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.


Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.

Immigration Orders and Their Economic Impact on Small Business: Insights from Attorney and Former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff

President Trump's recent executive orders, targeting immigration policies, could significantly impact small businesses in Ohio, particularly those owned by undocumented immigrants. With stricter visa vetting, halted refugee admissions, and potential deportations, these businesses face uncertainty, workforce disruption, and closures. Ohio's immigrant-owned businesses, especially in food services and transportation, contribute billions to the state economy, and any disruption could result in economic ripple effects.