Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Department of Education Proposes Redefinition of “Professional Degree,” Excluding Nursing and Limiting Graduate Loan Borrowing

Client Alert
February 20, 2026

In response to President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the U.S. Department of Education (the Department) recently announced several federal student-loan related changes, including redefining what the Department considers to be a “professional degree”. Nursing is one of several degrees excluded from the list.

The Department issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for “Reimagining and Improving Student Education” on January 30, 2026. The public is invited to submit comments on the proposed rules by March 2, 2026. 

The professional degrees recognized under OBBBA are as follows:

  • Pharmacy (Pharm.D.)
  • Dentistry (D.D.S. or D.M.D.)
  • Veterinary Medicine (D.V.M.)
  • Chiropractic (D.C. or D.C.M.)
  • Law (L.L.B. or J.D.)
  • Medicine (M.D.)
  • Optometry (O.D.)
  • Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.)
  • Podiatry (D.P.M., D.P., or Pod.D.)
  • Theology (M.Div., or M.H.L.)

The Department also seeks to eliminate the Grad PLUS program that currently affords graduate students the ability to borrow up to the full cost of attendance. Students in professional degree programs will be limited to borrowing $50,000 per year with up to $200,000 over their lifetimes. Meanwhile, for students in graduate programs not deemed to be a “professional degree” program, the borrowing limits will be $20,500 per year with a $100,000 lifetime cap.

The Under Secretary of Education, Nicholas Kent, stated the proposed changes “will help drive a sea of change in higher education by holding universities accountable for outcomes and putting significant downward pressure on the cost of tuition.” Further, Under Secretary Kent believes “[t]his will benefit borrowers who will no longer be pushed into insurmountable debt to finance degrees that do not pay off.”

If you would like assistance drafting comments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed changes, or you want to learn more about how the borrowing restrictions may impact you, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

HealthcareEducationJeana SingletonKate Crawford
Client Alert

A Shift in Coverage: HHS Reinterprets “Federal Public Benefit” Under PRWORA

July 16, 2025The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services rescinded a 1998 interpretation of “federal public benefit” used in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) on July 10, 2025. This notice removes "outdating exclusions" and includes additional programs under “federal public benefit."Client Alert

Supreme Court Upholds Coverage under the Affordable Care Act

July 10, 2025The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the authority of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force under the ACA, ensuring continued no-cost coverage for over 100 preventive health services. The decision impacts millions of Americans and preserves provider reimbursement through insurance.Client Alert

Health Care Providers Take Note: Federal Budget Brings Medicaid and Staffing Rule Changes

July 7, 2025The 2025 federal budget introduces significant changes for health care providers and Medicaid recipients, including new cost-sharing requirements, work eligibility mandates, rural health grants, and a pause on minimum staffing rules.Client Alert

Key Healthcare Provisions in Ohio’s 2026–2027 Budget

July 2, 2025Ohio’s newly enacted biennial budget (HB 96) for FY 2026–2027 brings sweeping changes for healthcare providers across the state. The law includes new Medicaid eligibility requirements, reporting mandates, funding directives, and social policy provisions. Several vetoes by Governor DeWine also affect healthcare-related initiatives.Client Alert

Providers Beware: Court Sides with Insurers in No Surprises Act Arbitration

July 2, 2025On June 12, 2025, the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of Aetna and Kaiser in two lawsuits brought by air ambulance providers challenging how insurers calculated payments under the No Surprises Act’s Independent Dispute Resolution process. The court held that unless there is clear evidence of fraud or serious misconduct, IDR decisions will stand, reinforcing the finality of the arbitration process.
Older posts
Newer posts