Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Department of Education Proposes Redefinition of “Professional Degree,” Excluding Nursing and Limiting Graduate Loan Borrowing

Client Alert
February 20, 2026

In response to President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the U.S. Department of Education (the Department) recently announced several federal student-loan related changes, including redefining what the Department considers to be a “professional degree”. Nursing is one of several degrees excluded from the list.

The Department issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for “Reimagining and Improving Student Education” on January 30, 2026. The public is invited to submit comments on the proposed rules by March 2, 2026. 

The professional degrees recognized under OBBBA are as follows:

  • Pharmacy (Pharm.D.)
  • Dentistry (D.D.S. or D.M.D.)
  • Veterinary Medicine (D.V.M.)
  • Chiropractic (D.C. or D.C.M.)
  • Law (L.L.B. or J.D.)
  • Medicine (M.D.)
  • Optometry (O.D.)
  • Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.)
  • Podiatry (D.P.M., D.P., or Pod.D.)
  • Theology (M.Div., or M.H.L.)

The Department also seeks to eliminate the Grad PLUS program that currently affords graduate students the ability to borrow up to the full cost of attendance. Students in professional degree programs will be limited to borrowing $50,000 per year with up to $200,000 over their lifetimes. Meanwhile, for students in graduate programs not deemed to be a “professional degree” program, the borrowing limits will be $20,500 per year with a $100,000 lifetime cap.

The Under Secretary of Education, Nicholas Kent, stated the proposed changes “will help drive a sea of change in higher education by holding universities accountable for outcomes and putting significant downward pressure on the cost of tuition.” Further, Under Secretary Kent believes “[t]his will benefit borrowers who will no longer be pushed into insurmountable debt to finance degrees that do not pay off.”

If you would like assistance drafting comments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed changes, or you want to learn more about how the borrowing restrictions may impact you, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

HealthcareEducationJeana SingletonKate Crawford
Client Alert

Introducing HB 281: Enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws in Ohio Hospitals

July 1, 2025House Bill 281, introduced on May 20, 2025, would require Ohio hospitals to allow law enforcement, including federal immigration agents, to enter facilities and enforce immigration laws. The bill mandates that hospitals comply with information requests and adopt formal policies, raising significant concerns about patient privacy and access to care for immigrant communities.Client Alert

Parental Consent May Soon Be Required for Minor Mental Health Services in Ohio

June 25, 2025HB 172 proposes repealing a provision in Ohio law that allows minors age 14 and older to consent to limited outpatient mental health services without parental involvement. The bill would require parental consent for all such care and remove related language from other sections of the Ohio Revised Code.Client Alert

Community Behavioral Health Providers - Supervisor Pricing Changes Begin July 1 [Corrected Date]

June 16, 2025Effective June 16, community behavioral health providers wishing to receive reimbursement at the supervisor rate must add the HP or HT Modifier to fee-for-service (FFS) claims. Find out about the new guidelines.Client Alert

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

June 16, 2025On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.Client Alert

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

June 11, 2025In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.
Older posts
Newer posts