Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

Client Alert

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced the immediate revocation of the longstanding Richardson Waiver, a policy requiring public notice and comment on certain agency decisions involving contracts, grants, benefits, property, and public loans. This move, detailed in a March 3 policy statement by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., eliminates a key mechanism for stakeholder input on agency policy shifts.

Key Policy Changes

The elimination of the Richardson Waiver means that HHS will no longer be required to allow a 60-day public comment period before finalizing policy changes related to grants and benefits. As a result, HHS will now have the ability to implement new policies much more quickly, potentially impacting Medicaid and National Institutes of Health funding rules. This change eliminates opportunities for healthcare providers and other stakeholders to weigh in on crucial policy decisions – like implementing Medicaid work requirements – before they take effect. This change does not impact Medicare, which follows separate statutory public input rules and remains subject to different procedural requirements.

Industry groups have expressed concerns that eliminating public comment could lead to less transparency and hastily implemented policies that lack sufficient vetting. Without an opportunity for public review, new regulations may be more prone to unintended consequences, creating additional burdens for states, providers, and patients.

What This Means for Healthcare Providers

Healthcare providers and other stakeholders should prepare for more rapid and potentially unpredictable policy shifts from HHS. The absence of a formal comment process means that affected entities may need to explore alternative advocacy strategies to engage with policymakers.

We will continue to monitor developments and provide updates on any significant policy changes stemming from this decision. Please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com with any questions about how this may impact your organization.


BMD Appellate Win Clarifies Waiver of Contractual Right to Arbitrate

Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC attorneys David M. Scott, Lucas K. Palmer, and Krista D. Warren prevailed before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit regarding if/when a party waives a contractual right to arbitrate. Borror Property Management, LLC v. Oro Karric North, LLC, No. 20-3146 (the “Decision”).

Relief for Ohio Under the Federal American Rescue Plan Act

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (the “Act”) — a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package — a significant portion of which will be directed to the State of Ohio to support economic recovery, as outlined below.

Cleveland Manufacturer Violated OFAC Sanctions By Allowing Shipments To Iran - Know Your Customer and Know Their Customer

UniControl, Inc., a Cleveland, Ohio manufacturer of process controls, airflow pressure switches, boiler controls and other instruments, agreed to pay the Office of Foreign Assets Control “OFAC,” the financial enforcement agency of the U.S. Treasury Department, $216,464 to settle its liabilities for violations of the Iran Sanctions Program. OFAC stated that “this enforcement action highlights the importance of identifying and assessing multiple warning signs that indicate a foreign trade partner may be re-exporting goods to a sanctioned jurisdiction.”

Ohio Breach of Contract Statute of Limitations Shortened to 6 Years

On March 16, 2021, Governor DeWine signed into law S.B. 13 which shortens Ohio’s statute of limitations for filing lawsuits based on breach of contract. A statute of limitation is the time period within which a party must file a lawsuit before its claim expires as a matter of law.

Chinese Product Tariff Challenge Causes Flurry of Importer Lawsuits

A lawsuit filed late in 2020 at the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) challenging the U.S. Trade Representative’s (USTR) implementation of Section 301 “List 3” and “List 4” duties on products from China, HMTX Industries LLC et al. v. United States (Court No. 20-00177), has resulted in the filing of thousands of additional lawsuits brought by other affected importers. There are now 3,700+ companies added to the list, including Ford, Home Depot, Target, Tesla, and Walgreens, along with many other smaller importers.