Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

House Republicans Propose Cuts to Medicaid to Finance Savings

Client Alert

House Republicans released legislative language yesterday that highlights a key piece of their budget bill – cuts to the Medicaid entitlement program. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) previously indicated that it would not be possible for House Republicans to achieve President Trump’s desired $880 billion in savings over 10 years without making substantial changes to Medicaid. That prediction came to fruition; the bill proposes Medicaid spending reductions to be achieved through policy changes that include more frequent eligibility verification, citizenship checks, tougher screenings of providers; and federal Medicaid funding cuts to states that offer coverage to residents living in the U.S. illegally.

The bill also seeks to impose work requirements for able-bodied adults aged 19 to 64 who do not have dependents, demanding they work at least 80 hours — or perform 80 hours of community service or other programs — per month. It includes exceptions for pregnant women. These requirements are more stringent than those included in Ohio’s Medicaid work requirements waiver that was recently submitted to the Federal government for approval. Ohio’s proposal applies to Medicaid expansion enrollees under age 55 who must be employed, be enrolled in school or a job training program, be in a recovery program, or have a serious physical or mental health illness to receive benefits.

These Federal Medicaid cuts threaten to force states to change how they finance their programs, to cut benefits, and/or to implement their own policy changes like adding cost-sharing requirements for beneficiaries in the program.

Following the release of the legislative language, the CBO issued a preliminary analysis finding that the health care portion of the bill would cut spending by $715 billion and would “reduce the number of people with health insurance by at least 8.6 million in 2034.”

For insights on how these Medicaid changes could affect you or your clients, contact BMD Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com


Parental Consent May Soon Be Required for Minor Mental Health Services in Ohio

HB 172 proposes repealing a provision in Ohio law that allows minors age 14 and older to consent to limited outpatient mental health services without parental involvement. The bill would require parental consent for all such care and remove related language from other sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

Community Behavioral Health Providers - Supervisor Pricing Changes Begin July 1 [Corrected Date]

Effective June 16, community behavioral health providers wishing to receive reimbursement at the supervisor rate must add the HP or HT Modifier to fee-for-service (FFS) claims. Find out about the new guidelines.

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.