Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

House Republicans Propose Cuts to Medicaid to Finance Savings

Client Alert

House Republicans released legislative language yesterday that highlights a key piece of their budget bill – cuts to the Medicaid entitlement program. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) previously indicated that it would not be possible for House Republicans to achieve President Trump’s desired $880 billion in savings over 10 years without making substantial changes to Medicaid. That prediction came to fruition; the bill proposes Medicaid spending reductions to be achieved through policy changes that include more frequent eligibility verification, citizenship checks, tougher screenings of providers; and federal Medicaid funding cuts to states that offer coverage to residents living in the U.S. illegally.

The bill also seeks to impose work requirements for able-bodied adults aged 19 to 64 who do not have dependents, demanding they work at least 80 hours — or perform 80 hours of community service or other programs — per month. It includes exceptions for pregnant women. These requirements are more stringent than those included in Ohio’s Medicaid work requirements waiver that was recently submitted to the Federal government for approval. Ohio’s proposal applies to Medicaid expansion enrollees under age 55 who must be employed, be enrolled in school or a job training program, be in a recovery program, or have a serious physical or mental health illness to receive benefits.

These Federal Medicaid cuts threaten to force states to change how they finance their programs, to cut benefits, and/or to implement their own policy changes like adding cost-sharing requirements for beneficiaries in the program.

Following the release of the legislative language, the CBO issued a preliminary analysis finding that the health care portion of the bill would cut spending by $715 billion and would “reduce the number of people with health insurance by at least 8.6 million in 2034.”

For insights on how these Medicaid changes could affect you or your clients, contact BMD Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com


Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Provider Settlement Opportunity

A proposed $2.8 billion settlement in the Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation may offer payments to eligible healthcare providers who delivered services between July 24, 2008 and October 4, 2024. Claims must be submitted by July 29, 2025.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.

Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content, but it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.

Tariffs, Market Downturn, and Employment Considerations for Employers

As tariffs continue to impact various industries, employers must prepare for the ripple effects these economic pressures can have on workforce management. The economic impact can dramatically impact companies’ bottom lines, and companies look to improve finances and save for the future and many will choose to reduce employee count/wages.