Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

House Republicans Propose Cuts to Medicaid to Finance Savings

Client Alert

House Republicans released legislative language yesterday that highlights a key piece of their budget bill – cuts to the Medicaid entitlement program. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) previously indicated that it would not be possible for House Republicans to achieve President Trump’s desired $880 billion in savings over 10 years without making substantial changes to Medicaid. That prediction came to fruition; the bill proposes Medicaid spending reductions to be achieved through policy changes that include more frequent eligibility verification, citizenship checks, tougher screenings of providers; and federal Medicaid funding cuts to states that offer coverage to residents living in the U.S. illegally.

The bill also seeks to impose work requirements for able-bodied adults aged 19 to 64 who do not have dependents, demanding they work at least 80 hours — or perform 80 hours of community service or other programs — per month. It includes exceptions for pregnant women. These requirements are more stringent than those included in Ohio’s Medicaid work requirements waiver that was recently submitted to the Federal government for approval. Ohio’s proposal applies to Medicaid expansion enrollees under age 55 who must be employed, be enrolled in school or a job training program, be in a recovery program, or have a serious physical or mental health illness to receive benefits.

These Federal Medicaid cuts threaten to force states to change how they finance their programs, to cut benefits, and/or to implement their own policy changes like adding cost-sharing requirements for beneficiaries in the program.

Following the release of the legislative language, the CBO issued a preliminary analysis finding that the health care portion of the bill would cut spending by $715 billion and would “reduce the number of people with health insurance by at least 8.6 million in 2034.”

For insights on how these Medicaid changes could affect you or your clients, contact BMD Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com


Will Student-Athlete Collectives Survive NIL Changes?

By July 2025 the landscape of student-athlete funding will look nothing like the current landscape, so preparing now is a must. If you are a student-athlete, the parent of a student-athlete, a university/college, or “booster”, it behooves you to understand these evolving issues.

Ohio's Recent Rule Changes to Administration of Immunizations, Outpatient Pharmacy Delivery, and Mobile Response Services

The Ohio Board of Pharmacy (“BOP”) and Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“OMHAS”) recently posted notices of Ohio Administrative Code rule changes related to the administration of immunizations (BOP), outpatient pharmacy delivery services (BOP), and mobile response and stabilization services (OMHAS).

HOA Construction Project Do’s and Don’ts

Local regulators can approve new construction, but if a resident contacts their homeowners association there may be trouble. Fences, yard alterations, and backyard decks do not have to be such a hassle and a point of conflict. Find out general Do’s and Don’ts to help HOA residents avoid issues in this article by BMD Partner Scott Heasley.

New Ohio Recovery Housing Rules Take Effect January 1, 2025

Ohio’s new recovery housing rules, effective January 1, 2025, require certified community behavioral health providers to refer clients only to accredited recovery housing residences listed on the statewide registry.

SCOTUS to Weigh In on Medicaid Beneficiaries’ Right to Choose their Provider

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments this spring on whether Medicaid beneficiaries have an enforceable right to choose their healthcare providers without state interference, as outlined in Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act. This case stems from a South Carolina petition challenging a Fourth Circuit ruling that blocked the state from terminating Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid provider agreement.