Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Marijuana Reclassification and APRN/PA Prescribing

Client Alert

Overview

Marijuana is expected to be reclassified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) from a Schedule I controlled substance to a Schedule III controlled substance as a result of efforts by the Biden administration.

Schedule I controlled substances are defined under the Controlled Substances Act as having a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the U.S., and a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug under medical supervision. By contrast, Schedule III substances are defined as having a potential for abuse less than drugs in Schedules I and II, have a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the U.S., and abuse of the drug may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence.[1]

Effect on APRN and PA Prescribing in Ohio

Providers, including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs) are not permitted to prescribe Schedule I controlled substances. Therefore, neither APRNs nor PAs in Ohio are permitted to prescribe marijuana to patients while still classified as a Schedule I controlled substance.

However, both APRNs and PAs are permitted to prescribe Schedule III controlled substances, so long as the medication is within the provider’s scope of practice. For APRNs, this means that the prescription is used to treat conditions consistent with their education, clinical experience, and national certification, and within the parameters of their standard care arrangement with a physician who is practicing in a specialty that is the same or similar to theirs.[2] The drug also cannot exceed the prescriptive authority of their collaborating physician.[3] Similarly, PAs with prescriptive authority are limited to prescribing drugs that are a part of their supervising physician’s normal course of practice and expertise and do not exceed their supervising physician’s prescriptive authority.[4] The prescription also should be consistent with the terms of their supervision agreement.

Analysis

While the reclassification of marijuana from Schedule I to III should allow for APRNs and PAs to prescribe marijuana, Ohio Revised Code Chapter 3796 may still stand in the way.

Specifically, the rule currently states that when a patient or their caregiver is seeking to use medical marijuana, “the physician who holds a certificate to recommend issued by the state medical board and is treating the patient or the physician's delegate shall submit the application on the patient's or caregiver's behalf…”[5]

“Physician” under Chapter 3796 is defined as, “an individual authorized under Chapter 4731 of the Revised Code to practice medicine and surgery or osteopathic medicine and surgery,” thus explicitly excluding APRNs and PAs.

Therefore, upon reclassification of marijuana, the question will be whether Ohio law also changes, doing away with the “certificate to recommend,” since providers will now be able to directly prescribe marijuana for their patients. Currently, the certificate to recommend allows patients with qualifying medical conditions to legally purchase and use marijuana.

If you have any questions regarding the pending reclassification of marijuana or general questions regarding APRNs or PAs, please don’t hesitate to contact BMD Health Law Group Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001, or BMD Attorney Rachel Stermer at rcstermer@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2019.  

[1] 21 U.S.C. § 812.

[2] ORC § 4723.431.

[3] ORC § 4723.481.

[4] ORC § 4730.20 and ORC § 4730.42.

[5] ORC § 3796.08.


CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.

House Republicans Propose Cuts to Medicaid to Finance Savings

House Republicans have introduced legislative language that proposes substantial cuts to the Medicaid entitlement program, aiming to achieve significant budget savings through policy changes. The proposed measures include stricter eligibility verification, work requirements for certain adults, and federal funding cuts to states providing coverage to undocumented residents. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the proposed healthcare provisions would reduce spending by $715 billion and could result in 8.6 million fewer people having health insurance by 2034.

Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content, but it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.