Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Name, Image, and Likeness Agreements in Healthcare

Client Alert

Have you worked hard to cultivate your brand as a healthcare provider? If so, executing a Name, Image, and Likeness (“NIL”) agreement may be of interest to you. NIL agreements are contracts that allow an individual to profit from their name, image, and likeness. Specifically, these agreements protect an individual’s brand by defining how others can utilize their name, image, and likeness in advertisements, sponsorships, and endorsements, and the compensation the individual will receive as a result. NIL agreements are typically used in the context of athletics, such as enabling student-athletes to profit from their personal brand. However, NIL agreements have recently proved to be useful in other areas. For example, some healthcare providers have begun to utilize NIL agreements to promote the brand they have created through their healthcare practice.  Most recently, we have seen the most healthcare NIL activity with longevity and wellness providers, as well as orthopedics.  

Depending on who wishes to contract with a provider for NIL rights, there can be regulatory concerns.  Remember, healthcare is one of the most regulated industries in the United States!  If there is the potential to generate referrals for services that will be paid by a government health plan, NIL agreements must comply with applicable regulations that limit when and how a healthcare provider can accept payment for certain referrals, such as the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Physician Self-Referral Law, commonly known as the Stark Law. Conversely, if there are no third-party reimbursements possible (i.e. a contract with a sporting goods store), then the regulatory landscape looks different. In addition, any anecdotal information the healthcare provider chooses to share is subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), meaning that all identifying patient information must be removed.  

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) also has standards that healthcare providers must follow when advertising. Healthcare providers should ensure that any NIL agreements meet the FTC standard for medical advertising, and that any statements made by the healthcare provider are true, not materially misleading, and are supported with scientific evidence.       

We recommend engaging an attorney to draft or review your healthcare NIL agreement to ensure that it complies with the complex and changing regulations, and that it ultimately protects your interests.

To learn more about how healthcare NIL agreements could impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001.         


Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.