Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio House Bill 429: Potential Relief for Providers Facing Same-Day Reimbursement Restrictions

Client Alert

As a provider, how often have you encountered the situation where a patient needs multiple procedures, but their insurance requires them to have each procedure done on a different day? For example, orthopedic surgeons have found situations where a hand surgery needs to be done on multiple fingers, but there is decreasing reimbursement for each finger after the first one. We also have gastroenterologists who need to perform different types of endoscopies, but the payers limit them to one endoscopy on the same patient in one day. There is also the “same tax ID” game where a patient can only see one provider under a single tax ID in one day, which is a problem when the patient could see a specialist on the same day as their primary care provider.

House Bill (HB) 429 may help fix these reimbursement issues. HB 429 was introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives on August 28, 2025 and seeks to amend O.R.C. 3901.385, which places certain prohibitions on third-party payers.

ORC 3901.385 currently prohibits third-party payers from (1) engaging in any business practice that unfairly or unnecessarily delays the processing of a claim or the payment of any amount due for health care services rendered by a provider to a beneficiary; and (2) from refusing to process or pay within the time periods specified in O.R.C. 3901.381 a claim submitted by a provider on the grounds the beneficiary has not been discharged from the hospital or the treatment has not been completed, if the submitted claim covers services actually rendered and charges actually incurred over at least a thirty-day period.

If passed by the Ohio General Assembly, HB 429 specifically proposes to add language prohibiting a third-party payer from reducing a provider’s reimbursement for the provision of a covered health care service based on (1) the third-party payer's own description of what is included in the specific service outside of the most current CPT code in effect, the most current ICD-10 code in effect, the most current CDT code in effect, or the most current HCPCS code in effect; (2) the third-party payer's own description of what is included in the diagnosis code submitted on the claim outside of guidelines established by entities responsible for the code set, including the centers for disease control and prevention's national center for health statistics; and (3) that the provider billed for additional health services, including outpatient surgery, on the same date as the covered service. The prohibitions that HB 429 proposes can have far reaching effects on provider reimbursement.

HB 429 is part of the Ohio State Medical Association’s insurance reform package that supports legislation seeking to protect patients’ interests and physician decision-making.[1]

To learn more about HB 429 and how the Bill could impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com.


[1] Insurance Reform, Ohio State Medical Association,  https://osma.org/aws/OSMA/pt/sp/insurance-reform, (last accessed September 11, 2025).


ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.