Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio House Bill 537: Proposed Regulations for Midwives and Birthing Centers

Client Alert
January 28, 2026

Smiling midwife consulting with a pregnant woman during a prenatal checkup, illustrating midwifery regulations under Ohio House Bill 537

The Ohio Board of Nursing (“BON”) and the Ohio Department of Commerce may soon regulate midwifery in Ohio. House Bill 537 was introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives on October 21, 2025. The Bill seeks to add or amend sections in the Ohio Revised Code (“ORC”) relating to certified nurse-midwives, certified midwives, licensed midwives, and traditional midwives. In doing so, the proposed Bill accounts for full regulation of these practice areas and defines roles for individual midwife designations. The following highlights key changes that are proposed in H.B. 537:   

Certified Nurse-Midwives: 

  • Allows a certified nurse-midwife (“CNM”) to, “in collaboration with one or more physicians, attend births in hospitals, homes, medical offices, and freestanding birthing centers and provide care for normal newborns during the period consistent with the scope of practice for certified nurse-midwives established by the American college of nurse-midwives.”[1]
  • Prohibits CNMs from treating “abnormal condition[s] that are outside of the scope of practice for certified nurse-midwives established by the American college of nurse-midwives, except in emergencies.” [2]
  • Prohibits CNMs from “delivering breech or face presentation except in an emergency or as provided in section 4723.581 of the Revised Code.” [3]

Certified Midwives:

  • Establishes that the BON “shall adopt rules establishing standards and procedures for the licensure and regulation of certified midwives.” [4]
  • States that a certified midwife (“CM”) is an individual who may practice only in accordance with a standard care arrangement (“SCA”) and adds “certified midwife” to all applicable SCA provisions. [5]
  • Establishes what activities a CM may engage in when in collaboration with one or more physicians.[6]

Licensed Midwives:

  • Establishes what is within the scope of a licensed midwife (“LM”) and what activities LMs may engage in.[7]

Traditional Midwives:

  • Establishes what is within the scope of a traditional midwife (“TM”) and what activities TMs may engage in.[8]

Free Standing Birthing Centers:

  • Requires free standing birthing centers to have one of the following attend each birth:
    • “A physician licensed under Chapter 4731 of the Revised Code to practice medicine and surgery or osteopathic medicine and surgery;
    • A certified nurse-midwife licensed under Chapter 4723 of the Revised Code;
    • A certified midwife licensed under Chapter 4723 of the Revised Code;
    • A licensed midwife licensed under Chapter 4724 of the Revised Code.”[9]
  • Each freestanding birthing center must have a director of patient services who is one of the following:
    • “A physician licensed under Chapter 4731 of the Revised Code to practice medicine and surgery or osteopathic medicine and surgery;
    • A certified nurse-midwife licensed under Chapter 4723 of the Revised Code who has contracted with a collaborating physician;
    • A certified midwife licensed under Chapter 4723. of the Revised Code who has contracted with a collaborating physician.”[10]
  • Proposes that a hospital that is a “Medicaid provider and that operates a maternity unit shall agree to a written transfer agreement with any freestanding birthing center if both of the following apply”:[11]
    • The freestanding birthing center is located within a thirty-mile radius of the hospital.
    • The freestanding birthing center has requested a transfer agreement.
  • States that a transfer agreement shall “specify an effective procedure for the safe and immediate transfer of patients from the freestanding birthing center to the hospital when medical care beyond the care that can be provided at the freestanding birthing center is necessary, including when emergency situations occur or medical complications arise.”[12]

Home Births:

  • A CNM or CM shall be allowed to attend a vaginal birth after caesarean (“VBAC”), birth of twins, or breech birth as a home birth only if the conditions described are satisfied:[13]
    • The patient gives their written informed consent, including a description of risks associated with the procedure.
    • The certified nurse-midwife or certified midwife consults with a physician about the patient and together with the physician determines whether referral is appropriate for the patient.
    • The certified nurse-midwife or certified midwife satisfies any other conditions required in rules adopted by the BON.
  • A LM shall be allowed to attend a VBAC, birth of twins, or breech birth as a home birth only if the conditions described are satisfied:[14]
    • The patient gives their written informed consent, including a description of risks associated with the procedure.
    • The licensed midwife consults with a physician, certified nurse-midwife, or certified midwife, and together with the physician or midwife determines whether referral is appropriate for the patient.
    • The LM satisfies any other conditions required in rules adopted by the BON.
  • Where a CNM or CM provides care for a planned homebirth, there must be an individualized transfer of care planned with each patient, and the CNM or CM must “assess the status of the patient, fetus, and newborn throughout the maternity care cycle and shall determine when or if a transfer to a hospital is necessary.” [15]

To learn more about H.B. 537 and how the proposed regulations may impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001. 

[1] H.B. 537, pg. 60-61, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (amending ORC Sec. 4723.43).

[2] Id. at 60.

[3] Id.

[4] H.B. 537, pg. 95, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 4723.59).

[5] H.B. 537, pg. 63, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (amending ORC Sec. 4723.431).

[6] H.B. 537, pg. 86-87, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 4723.57).

[7] H.B. 537, pg. 102, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 4724.05).

[8] H.B. 537, pg. 116, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 4724.14).

[9] H.B. 537, pg. 5-6, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (amends ORC Sec. 3702.30).

[10] H.B. 537, pg. 6, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (amends ORC Sec. 3702.30).

[11] H.B. 537, pg. 8-9, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 3722.15).

[12] H.B. 537, pg. 8-9, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 3722.15).

[13] H.B. 537, pg. 89-90, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 4723.581).

[14] H.B. 537, pg. 106-107, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding, ORC Sec. 4724.08). 

[15] H.B. 537, pg. 90, available at https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/api/v2/general_assembly_136/legislation/hb537/00_IN/pdf/ (adding ORC Sec. 4723.582).

Health LawHealthcareHealthcare PolicyJeana Singleton
Client Alert

Enhancing Privacy Protections for Substance Use Disorder Patient Records

February 16, 2024On February 8, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) finalized updated rules to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) for the protection of Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) patient records. The updated rules reflect the requirement that the Part 2 rules be more closely aligned with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) privacy, breach notification, and enforcement rules as mandated by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020.Client Alert

Columbus, Ohio Ordinance Prohibits Employers from Inquiries into an Applicant’s Salary History

January 30, 2024Effective March 1, 2024, Columbus employers are prohibited from inquiring into an applicant’s salary history. Specifically, the ordinance provides that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice to:Client Alert

The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board’s Latest Batch of Rules: What Providers Should Know

January 26, 2024The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board has introduced new rules and amendments, covering various aspects such as CDCA certificate requirements, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, remote supervision, and reciprocity application requirements. Notable changes include revised criteria for obtaining a CDCA certification, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, and updated ethical obligations for licensees and certificate holders, including non-discrimination, confidentiality, and anti-sexual harassment measures.Client Alert

Governor Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University Introduce the SOAR Study on Ohio Mental Illness

January 22, 2024On January 19, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University announced a new research initiative, the State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (“SOAR”) study, which will investigate all factors influencing Ohio’s mental illness and addiction epidemic.Client Alert

CHANGING TIDES: Summary and Effects of Burnett et. al. v. National Ass’n of Realtors, et. al.

January 17, 2024In April 2019, a class-action Complaint was filed in federal court for the Western District Court for Missouri arguing that the traditional payment agreements employed by many across the United States amounted to conspiracy resulting in the artificial increase in brokerage commissions. Plaintiffs, a class-action group comprised of sellers, argued that they paid excessive brokerage commissions upon the sale of their home as a result of the customary payment structure where Sellers agree to pay the full commission on the sale of their property, with Seller’s agent notating the portion of commission they are willing to pay to a Buyer’s agent at closing on the MLS or other similar system.
Older posts
Newer posts