Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio Passes Antidiscrimination Provision for CRNA Reimbursement

Client Alert

The passage of Ohio House Bill 96 (HB 96), which sets forth the state’s operating budget, includes important legislation regarding certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). Health benefit plans will soon be required to pay CRNAs at the same reimbursement rate as their physician counterparts for performing the same service. The new law seeks to promote patient access to care by prohibiting discrimination against CRNAs acting within the scope of their licensure. In recent years, CRNAs have faced payment discrimination from certain insurers who reduced their reimbursement rate from 100% to 85%, or who prohibited CRNA reimbursement altogether, based on their status as non-physician practitioners. Meanwhile, physician anesthesiologists are reimbursed at 100% for providing the same care.

Advocates for provider nondiscrimination have argued that discrimination based on provider licensure keeps patients from accessing the care they need. Ohio’s new law is an attempt to remedy this barrier to patient care while ensuring CRNAs are paid equally for performing the same tasks as physician anesthesiologists.

Ohio joins several other states who have enacted similar legislation for payment equality among providers rendering the same service including Maine[1], Virginia[2], Delaware[3], and New Hampshire[4]. This legislation does not prevent insurers from establishing variable reimbursement rates based on quality or performance measures. The new law will go into effect on September 30, 2025.

If you have any questions about the impact of HB 96 on CRNA reimbursement, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

[1] 24-A MRSA §4320-Q

[2] VA Code Ann. § 38.2-3408

[3] 19 DE Admin. Code 1341-4.11

[4] N.H. Rev. Stat. § 420-J:8(VIII)(f)


Update on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Related Countries

USCIS has temporarily extended Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for certain Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries from Haiti and several other countries following recent court action. Employers and TPS recipients should review EAD expiration dates, monitor ongoing developments, and ensure compliance with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements.

HHS Accessibility Requirements for Medical Diagnostic Equipment: What Health Care Providers Need to Know

Health care providers that receive federal financial assistance are now subject to updated HHS accessibility requirements for medical diagnostic equipment under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. With the July 8, 2026, compliance deadline in effect, covered providers should ensure they have the required accessible equipment, train staff, and review operational practices to reduce compliance risk and provide accessible care for patients with disabilities.

Florida Super Lawyers® Recognizes Brennan Manna Diamond Attorneys to the 2026 Lists

BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND is proud to announce that three of our attorneys have been designated to the 2026 Florida Super Lawyers® and Florida Rising Stars® lists. Super Lawyers is based on multiple categories of independent research and peer evaluation to identify outstanding lawyers.

Supreme Court Clears Path for TPS Terminations: What Employers Need to Know

The U.S. Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 decision in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot removed legal obstacles that had delayed the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria. The ruling also reinforces the administration's authority to terminate other TPS designations currently under review. Employers should immediately identify workers whose employment authorization is tied to affected TPS programs, review Form I-9 records, and prepare for forthcoming USCIS guidance before taking any employment action.

The Risks of Outsourcing Medical Billing and the Importance of State-Law Compliance

Offshoring medical billing and other administrative functions can reduce costs, but it also raises significant compliance, operational, and contractual risks. Although HIPAA does not explicitly prohibit protected health information from being accessed or stored outside the United States, healthcare providers and their vendors remain responsible for safeguarding patient information and complying with state-specific restrictions that may limit or prohibit offshore subcontracting.