Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio Passes Antidiscrimination Provision for CRNA Reimbursement

Client Alert

The passage of Ohio House Bill 96 (HB 96), which sets forth the state’s operating budget, includes important legislation regarding certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). Health benefit plans will soon be required to pay CRNAs at the same reimbursement rate as their physician counterparts for performing the same service. The new law seeks to promote patient access to care by prohibiting discrimination against CRNAs acting within the scope of their licensure. In recent years, CRNAs have faced payment discrimination from certain insurers who reduced their reimbursement rate from 100% to 85%, or who prohibited CRNA reimbursement altogether, based on their status as non-physician practitioners. Meanwhile, physician anesthesiologists are reimbursed at 100% for providing the same care.

Advocates for provider nondiscrimination have argued that discrimination based on provider licensure keeps patients from accessing the care they need. Ohio’s new law is an attempt to remedy this barrier to patient care while ensuring CRNAs are paid equally for performing the same tasks as physician anesthesiologists.

Ohio joins several other states who have enacted similar legislation for payment equality among providers rendering the same service including Maine[1], Virginia[2], Delaware[3], and New Hampshire[4]. This legislation does not prevent insurers from establishing variable reimbursement rates based on quality or performance measures. The new law will go into effect on September 30, 2025.

If you have any questions about the impact of HB 96 on CRNA reimbursement, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

[1] 24-A MRSA §4320-Q

[2] VA Code Ann. § 38.2-3408

[3] 19 DE Admin. Code 1341-4.11

[4] N.H. Rev. Stat. § 420-J:8(VIII)(f)


Parental Consent May Soon Be Required for Minor Mental Health Services in Ohio

HB 172 proposes repealing a provision in Ohio law that allows minors age 14 and older to consent to limited outpatient mental health services without parental involvement. The bill would require parental consent for all such care and remove related language from other sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

Community Behavioral Health Providers - Supervisor Pricing Changes Begin July 1 [Corrected Date]

Effective June 16, community behavioral health providers wishing to receive reimbursement at the supervisor rate must add the HP or HT Modifier to fee-for-service (FFS) claims. Find out about the new guidelines.

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.