Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Permanent Injunction of “Heartbeat” Abortion Ban in Ohio

Client Alert
October 28, 2024

On October 24, 2024, Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Christian Jenkins held that Ohio’s six-week abortion ban (i.e., the “heartbeat” abortion ban) is unconstitutional under the state’s recently adopted reproductive rights amendment.

Ohio’s heartbeat law banned abortion once a heartbeat was detected and as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. The heartbeat law criminalized medical providers who rendered abortion care when a heartbeat was detected; penalties included felony charges, $20,000 fines, medical license suspension and revocation, and civil claims.

Attorney General Dave Yost previously argued that the heartbeat abortion ban could still take effect in Ohio despite passage in November 2023 of an abortion rights constitutional amendment. Judge Jenkins disagreed, holding that Ohio’s constitutional reproductive rights amendment is unambiguous and clearly represents the will of Ohio’s voters. According to Jenkins, the constitutional amendment must be given full effect, and any state laws, including the heartbeat law, that contradict it, must be enjoined.

The practical significance of this ruling is to provide clarity to medical providers regarding their ability to provide women’s health care without facing criminal, civil, or financial penalties, or actions against their license.

If you have questions about the ruling, or Ohio’s reproductive rights amendment, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com  or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.

HealthcareHealth LawReproductive Health CareAbortion
Client Alert

Implications of Supreme Court Stay for Business Operations in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo

September 16, 2025On September 8, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily reinstated immigration officers’ authority to conduct brief stops based on factors such as location, work type, language, or appearance. This stay in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo allows enforcement actions to resume in California pending appeal. Employers in industries like construction, agriculture, landscaping, and day labor should prepare for increased worksite disruptions and review compliance protocols.Client Alert

Ohio House Bill 429: Potential Relief for Providers Facing Same-Day Reimbursement Restrictions

September 15, 2025Ohio House Bill 429 aims to prevent third-party payers from reducing provider reimbursement for multiple procedures performed on the same day. The bill could improve payment practices for a range of specialties, including surgery and gastroenterology.Client Alert

FTC Continues to Target Noncompetes

September 11, 2025The FTC is intensifying its focus on noncompete agreements in healthcare, urging employers to review contracts for compliance. While Ohio still generally enforces noncompetes, pending legislation could limit their use.Client Alert

Medicare Updates: Prior Authorizations and Physician Fee Schedule

September 8, 2025The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced two key updates effective January 1, 2026: a six-state prior authorization pilot program targeting high-risk services under the WISeR Model, and proposed revisions to the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) that include increased payment rates, expanded telehealth coverage, and updated policies for chronic care, behavioral health, and rural providers.Client Alert

USCIS Policy Updates: Implications for Business Immigration

August 20, 2025In August 2025, USCIS issued three key policy updates enhancing vetting, good moral character (GMC) evaluations, and scrutiny of "anti-American" conduct in immigration adjudications. These policy memos will impact employers sponsoring foreign workers, including H-1B, L-1, EB visas, adjustments, and naturalization.
Older posts
Newer posts