Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

President Trump Signs Executive Orders that Enable Access to Affordable Meds

Client Alert

On Friday, July 24, 2020, President Trump signed four Executive Orders concerning prescription drug pricing which collectively direct the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to take the following actions:

1. Increase Patient Access to Insulin and Injectable Epinephrine

The first Executive Order, “Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications,” directs HHS to condition future federal grants available to Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”) under the Public Health Service Act on the FQHCs having established practices which make insulin and injectable epinephrine available for discounted prices to patients who:

  1. Have a high cost sharing requirement for these drugs;
  2. Have a high, unsatisfied deductible; or
  3. Have no health care insurance.

The intent of the Executive Order is to enable Americans who may otherwise struggle to afford these necessary medications access to them at a much lower price — comparable to what FQHCs pay through the 340B Drug Pricing Program. In other words, FQHCs would be required to pass their 304B savings onto medically underserved patients.

2. Facilitate the Importation of Certain Prescription Drugs

The President’s Executive Order, “Increasing Drug Importation to Lower Prices for American Patients,” aims at expanding access to low-cost imported drugs by directing HHS to:
(1) facilitate waivers relative to the prohibition of importation of prescription drugs,
(2) authorize reimportation as “required emergency medical care,” and (3) finalize a rule to allow importation of prescription drugs from Canada.

The Executive Order builds on the Safe Importation Action Plan issued by HHS and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last year, which provided two pathways to providing safe, lower cost drugs to American consumers. Under the new Executive Order, individual waivers to import drugs are permitted as long as the importation does not pose a risk to public safety.

3. Remove the Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor Protection for Prescription Rebates

President Trump’s third Executive Order, “Lowering Prices for Patients by Eliminating Kickbacks to Middlemen,” directs HHS to finalize its rule: “Removal of Safe Harbor Protection for Rebates Involving Prescription Pharmaceuticals and Certain Pharmacy Benefit Manager Service Fees,” commonly referred to as the “Rebate Rule.”

As it stands, prices that patients pay at the point-of-sale are oftentimes significantly higher than the prices that insurance companies, or the “middlemen” hired by insurance companies, actually pay for the drugs. This leads to those middlemen receiving large “rebate” checks which are, in essence, kickbacks for the heightened prices paid by Medicare patients.

In finalizing the Rebate Rule, HHS would:

  1. exclude from the safe harbor protections of the Anti-Kickback Statute certain reductions in price that are not applied at the point-of-sale or other remuneration that drug manufacturers provide to health plan sponsors, pharmacies, or PBMs in operating the Medicare Part D program; and
  2. establish new safe harbors that would permit health plan sponsors, pharmacies, and PBMs to apply discounts at the patient’s point-of-sale in order to lower the patient’s out-of-pocket costs, and that would permit the use of certain bona fide PBM service fees.

If finalized, the Rebate Rule would have the effect of collectively saving Medicare patients billions of dollars on prescription drugs.

4. Implement the “Most Favored Nation” Order to Lower Medicare Part B Drug Cost

In issuing the above Executive Orders, President Trump also announced another initiative — the “Most Favored Nation” order — which builds on his International Pricing Index (IPI) model to ensure lower cost Medicare Part B drugs that would set United States pricing at rates comparable to countries similarly situated economically.

Under the IPI model, the United States federal government would pay certain vendors directly for Medicare Part B drugs and certain physicians and hospitals administration fees for distribution.

To date, the IPI model has not been put into effect; however, President Trump indicated his intent to implement the Executive Order in late-August 2020.

The collective effect of the four Executive Orders issued by President Trump last week serves to make access to affordable medications for Americans, particularly vulnerable populations, a public health priority.

As a practical matter, however, the power of the Executive Order is limited — making the functional impact of the new directives dependent on how quickly HHS moves through the formal rule-making process.

As a result, the time frame in which the healthcare industry can expect to see systematic changes from the President’s Orders remains uncertain. In the meantime, healthcare entities should keep a watchful eye for new guidance from HHS.

Please contact BMD Health Law Attorney Jeana Singleton (jmsingleton@bmdllc.com) for questions regarding the new Executive Orders and their practical effect, or for any other healthcare questions.


New Ohio Reporting Requirements for Non-Residential Contractors

Ohio’s E-Verify Workforce Integrity Act, effective March 19, 2026, requires all nonresidential construction companies, subcontractors, and labor brokers to use E-Verify to confirm employee work eligibility on projects across the state. The law applies regardless of company size and carries financial penalties and potential restrictions on future state contracts for noncompliance. Some uncertainty remains around requirements for existing employees, making early compliance planning important.

DOT Non-Domiciled CDL Rule

A new rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will significantly narrow eligibility for non-domiciled Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) beginning March 16, 2026. The rule limits eligibility to holders of H-2A, H-2B, and E-2 visas and eliminates Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) as qualifying proof of work authorization. As a result, many lawfully present and work-authorized immigrants, including refugees, asylees, DACA recipients, and Temporary Protected Status holders, will no longer be able to obtain or renew a non-domiciled CDL. The change is expected to affect roughly 194,000 drivers nationwide and has prompted multiple legal challenges, including a pending emergency stay request before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

FinCEN Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule Now in Effect

FinCEN’s new Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule, effective March 1, 2026, requires certain real estate transfers to be reported to combat financial crimes. Transfers of residential property to entities or trusts without financing may require a Real Estate Report.

Department of Education Proposes Redefinition of “Professional Degree,” Excluding Nursing and Limiting Graduate Loan Borrowing

The U.S. Department of Education has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would redefine “professional degree” programs under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The proposal excludes nursing from the recognized list and would impose new borrowing limits for graduate students while eliminating the Grad PLUS program. Public comments are due by March 2, 2026.

First-of-Its-Kind Federal Ruling Finds Use of Consumer AI Tool May Destroy Attorney-Client Privilege

On February 10, 2026, Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a first-of-its-kind ruling finding that documents generated by a criminal defendant using a consumer AI platform were not protected by attorney-client privilege after being shared with counsel. The court treated the AI tool as a third party, concluding that entering sensitive information into a publicly available platform may waive confidentiality. The ruling also suggests that the work product doctrine may not apply where AI-generated materials are created independently by a client rather than at counsel’s direction. The decision signals that parties should exercise caution when using consumer AI tools in connection with legal matters.