Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Providers Beware: Court Sides with Insurers in No Surprises Act Arbitration

Client Alert
July 2, 2025

On June 12, 2025, the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of Aetna and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Kaiser) in a pair of cases filed by air ambulance providers challenging the No Surprises Act’s (NSA’s) Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process’ resolution of payment disputes. The NSA is a federal law seeking to protect patients from expensive and unexpected medical costs when seeking out-of-network care. To that end, the NSA created an IDR process for out-of-network providers and insurance companies to utilize to resolve payment disputes between the parties.

In this case, the air ambulance providers argued that Aetna and Kaiser miscalculated the providers’ Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) during IDR. The QPA is the rate used to settle out-of-network claims. According to the providers, Aetna and Kaiser intentionally calculated and utilized a low QPA during the IDR process, potentially skewing the arbitrator’s findings as to the correct amount the insurers were required to pay for air ambulance care.

However, the Fifth Circuit disagreed with the providers, holding that, while the NSA permits limited court review of IDR outcomes, legal challenges to IDR decisions must be based on clear evidence of fraud or serious misconduct. The Fifth Circuit also ruled that the third-party arbitrator was immune from suit for their decisions in the IDR process.

Following this ruling, it is clear that courts will not second-guess the decisions made during IDR absent clear evidence of fraud and serious misconduct.

The case is Guardian Flight, L.L.C. v. Aetna Health, Inc., No. 24-20204 (5th Cir. 2025).

To learn more about the NSA and its IDR process, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.

Health LawHealthcareDaphne KackloudisJordan Burdick
Client Alert

RNs and APRNs Take Note: Ohio Board of Nursing Mandates a New CE Reporting Period

April 29, 2026Ohio’s Board of Nursing has updated the continuing education reporting period for RNs and APRNs. Beginning March 26, 2026, CE credits must be completed between July 1 and June 30 of odd-numbered years, replacing the previous November to October timeframe.Client Alert

Ohio Med Spas: Peptide Do's and Do Not's

April 29, 2026Recent guidance from the Ohio Board of Pharmacy outlines key compliance requirements for med spas using peptides. While some peptide drugs are FDA approved, others are not or cannot be compounded. Med spa operators should ensure they source medications from licensed suppliers, avoid non-approved or “research use only” products, and follow all compounding and storage regulations to maintain compliance and avoid enforcement actions.Client Alert

Substance Use Disorder Providers: 42 CFR Part 2 Now Enforceable

April 15, 2026Updates to 42 CFR Part 2 are now enforceable, bringing significant changes to how substance use disorder (SUD) records are handled. The Final Rule aligns Part 2 more closely with HIPAA, introduces updated penalties, allows a single patient consent for treatment, payment, and operations, and adds new requirements for Notices of Privacy Practices. It also creates a formal definition of SUD counseling notes and imposes strict consent requirements for their use and disclosure. Providers should review and update policies to ensure compliance.Client Alert

AAA Introduces AI-Assisted Arbitrator for Certain Disputes

April 7, 2026The American Arbitration Association has introduced an AI-assisted arbitration platform designed to streamline certain document-based disputes. While a human arbitrator still makes the final decision, the technology can improve efficiency, reduce costs, and accelerate case resolution. Companies should weigh these benefits against considerations such as transparency, risk, and contractual requirements before adopting AI-assisted arbitration.Client Alert

Quiet Hours Texts and TCPA Claims: Consent Remains King as Courts Divide on Text Messages

March 31, 2026Businesses face increasing TCPA lawsuits over off-hours marketing texts, but recent court decisions highlight strong defenses. Clear consumer consent and updated terms and conditions can defeat many claims, while a growing number of courts are finding that text messages are not “telephone calls” under the statute. Proactive compliance measures, including clickwrap agreements and forum-selection clauses, are critical to reducing risk.
Older posts
Newer posts