Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

SCOTUS to Weigh In on Medicaid Beneficiaries’ Right to Choose their Provider

Client Alert

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) recently granted a petition filed by the state of South Carolina to determine whether Medicaid recipients have the right to choose their provider without state interference. Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act generally requires state Medicaid programs to permit Medicaid beneficiaries to seek care from any institution, agency, community pharmacy, or provider that is qualified and willing to deliver care to beneficiaries.

South Carolina filed its petition in response to a Fourth Circuit ruling that prevented South Carolina’s Medicaid program from terminating its provider agreement with Planned Parenthood. In the Fourth Circuit case, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic argued that Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act gives Medicaid beneficiaries the right to seek care from any qualified and willing provider and that it was not Congress’ intent for states to intrude on a Medicaid patients’ personal decisions about medical care. Arguments will take place this spring; SCOTUS will consider the merits of the case and issue a decision by the end of the summer.

If you have questions about the Supreme Court’s decision to determine whether a Medicaid beneficiary has an enforceable right to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is unqualified, please contact Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com, Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com, or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.


Supreme Court Clears Path for TPS Terminations: What Employers Need to Know

The U.S. Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 decision in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot removed legal obstacles that had delayed the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria. The ruling also reinforces the administration's authority to terminate other TPS designations currently under review. Employers should immediately identify workers whose employment authorization is tied to affected TPS programs, review Form I-9 records, and prepare for forthcoming USCIS guidance before taking any employment action.

The Risks of Outsourcing Medical Billing and the Importance of State-Law Compliance

Offshoring medical billing and other administrative functions can reduce costs, but it also raises significant compliance, operational, and contractual risks. Although HIPAA does not explicitly prohibit protected health information from being accessed or stored outside the United States, healthcare providers and their vendors remain responsible for safeguarding patient information and complying with state-specific restrictions that may limit or prohibit offshore subcontracting.

Risks of Using AI-Generated, Implied Celebrity Endorsements in Advertising

Businesses using AI-generated celebrity images, videos, or voice simulations in advertising may face significant legal risks if the content falsely implies an endorsement, affiliation, or sponsorship. This article discusses potential exposure under false advertising, right of publicity, consumer protection, and professional conduct laws, and explains why disclaimers may not be enough to avoid liability.

CMS Requires Providers to Use an Updated Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) Form by May 12, 2026

CMS has released an updated Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN), Form CMS-R-131, that all providers and suppliers must begin using by May 12, 2026. The revised form includes clearer language and formatting updates intended to improve patient understanding and compliance.

CMS and Ohio Ramp Up Fraud Enforcement in Home Health and Hospice

CMS and Ohio have launched sweeping new fraud prevention initiatives targeting home health and hospice providers, signaling a period of heightened scrutiny for enrollment, billing, documentation, and EVV compliance. While aimed at combating fraud, these measures also create significant operational and due process risks for compliant agencies, making proactive compliance programs, auditing, and governance more important than ever.