Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Substance Use Disorder Providers: 42 CFR Part 2 Now Enforceable

Client Alert

Does your practice treat patients with substance use disorders? Does your practice retain substance use disorder records? If the answer to one of those questions is “yes,” you will want to be aware of the recent updates to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) requirements.  

Part 2 extends patient privacy protections by applying stringent protections to a patients’ substance use disorder (“SUD”) medical records. Modifications to Part 2 under the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records Final Rule (“Final Rule”) went into effect on April 16, 2024, with a compliance date of February 16, 2026. The Final Rule modifications better aligned HIPAA and Part 2 standards and clarified previous Part 2 regulations. The following lists key changes that providers should be aware of:

Updated Penalties and Safe Harbor

The new Part 2 regulations apply HIPAA penalties to violations of Part 2. The regulations also create a “safe harbor” for investigative agencies (or those working on behalf of an investigative agency) that act with reasonable diligence before making a demand for records.[1]

Single Consent

The Final Rule “allows a single consent for all future uses and disclosures for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations.”[2]

Updated Content Requirements for Notice of Privacy Practices

The Final Rule creates specific content requirements that a Part 2 program must include in its Notice of Privacy Practices (“Notice”).[3]

A Part 2 Program must include specific information in the header of its Notice, including notifying patients of (1) how their health information may be used and disclosed; (2) their rights with respect to their health information; (3) how to file a complaint concerning a violation of the privacy or security of their health information; (4) their rights concerning their information, and (5) their right to have a copy of the Notice upon request.

In addition, a Part 2 program must include specific descriptions of how it will use and disclose patient records, a list of patients’ rights, such as the right to request restrictions of certain disclosures, a description of how a patient may exercise those rights, and a statement detailing the duties of the Part 2 program.

SUD Counseling Notes

Part 2 creates a new definition describing SUD counseling notes. Under Part 2, SUD counseling notes are “notes recorded (in any medium) by a Part 2 program provider who is a SUD or mental health professional documenting or analyzing the contents of conversation during a private SUD counseling session or a group, joint, or family SUD counseling session and that are separated from the rest of the patient's SUD and medical record.” [4]

The Final Rule mandates that a Part 2 program must obtain consent for any use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes, except:

  • To carry out the following treatment, payment, or health care operations:
    • Use by the originator of the SUD counseling notes for treatment;
    • Use or disclosure by the Part 2 program for its own training programs in which students, trainees, or practitioners in SUD treatment or mental health learn under supervision to practice or improve their skills in group, joint, family, or individual SUD counseling; or
    • Use or disclosure by the Part 2 program to defend itself in a legal action or other proceeding brought by the patient.
  • Use or disclosure that is required or permitted with respect to the oversight of the originator of the SUD counseling notes.[5]

The Final Rule also adds clarification that a written consent for a use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes may only be combined with another written consent for a use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes.[6]

Next Steps

Practices and providers will want to ensure that any policies are up to date and reflect the changes that are now enforceable under Part 2. We recommend engaging an attorney to review or update your current policies in order to ensure compliance with Part 2 updates.

To learn more about how the updates to 42 CFR Part 2 could impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001. 


[1] 42 CFR Sec. 2.3. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12474 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[2] 42 CFR Sec. 2.33. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12476 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf. See also, Fact Sheet 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, available at https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/regulatory-initiatives/fact-sheet-42-cfr-part-2-final-rule/index.html#ftn1.

[3] 42 CFR Sec. 2.22, See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12475 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[4] 42 CFR Sec. 2.11. See also, 42 CFR Sec. 2.12. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12474-12475 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[5] 42 CFR Sec. 2.31. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12476 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[6] Id.


New Vaccine Requirement for Select CMS-Participating Facilities

On November 4, 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (“CMS”) released a new rule requiring certain healthcare facilities to implement policies requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. It does not matter if a staff member does not perform patient treatment services, they must still be vaccinated if an employee of an applicable facility.

OSHA COVID-19 EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD (ETS) Vaccination, Testing, Recordkeeping, and Reporting

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued its long-awaited COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). Note that the ETS does not apply to employers covered under the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force COVID-19 Workplace Safety: Guidance for Federal Contractors or Subcontractors (see here), or to settings where employees provide healthcare services subject to OSHA’s ETS for the healthcare industry (see here).

Interesting Trends Revealed in 50-State Medicaid Budget Survey

Results of the KFF annual survey of state Medicaid directors reveal some fascinating trends in Medicaid service delivery and benefit coverage. Read on for a summary of the highlights we find most noteworthy. Background As a preliminary matter, many of the trends KFF identifies and that we highlight below are no doubt a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemic triggered a public health emergency and economic crisis that resulted in increased Medicaid enrollment, service offerings, and flexibility in service delivery, along with a heightened awareness of disparities in access to care and health outcomes.

Changes to Physician Assistant Statutes in Florida

In the last year, there have been many changes to the scope of practice and collaboration/supervision requirements for advanced practice providers such as APRNs and physician assistants in the state of Florida. In a previous Client Alert we discussed House Bill 607, which expanded the autonomous practice of APRNs providing primary care services in Florida.

Ohio Senate Bill 49 – Ohio Expands Lien Rights for Design Professionals

Effective September 30, 2021, Ohio granted limited lien rights to design professionals, including architects, landscape architects, engineers, and surveyors. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed Senate Bill 49 into law on July 1, 2021. This new law established a statutory right to lien commercial real estate by Ohio design professionals who, until now, could not file a lien for non-payment of professional services. Senator Vernon Sykes, a primary sponsor of Senate Bill 49, stated that the “legislation ensures that architects, engineers and other designers will get paid for their work, regardless of the outcome of their projects . . . It will support hardworking Ohioans by protecting the value of their labor . . ..”