Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Substance Use Disorder Providers: 42 CFR Part 2 Now Enforceable

Client Alert
April 15, 2026

Does your practice treat patients with substance use disorders? Does your practice retain substance use disorder records? If the answer to one of those questions is “yes,” you will want to be aware of the recent updates to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) requirements.  

Part 2 extends patient privacy protections by applying stringent protections to a patients’ substance use disorder (“SUD”) medical records. Modifications to Part 2 under the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records Final Rule (“Final Rule”) went into effect on April 16, 2024, with a compliance date of February 16, 2026. The Final Rule modifications better aligned HIPAA and Part 2 standards and clarified previous Part 2 regulations. The following lists key changes that providers should be aware of:

Updated Penalties and Safe Harbor

The new Part 2 regulations apply HIPAA penalties to violations of Part 2. The regulations also create a “safe harbor” for investigative agencies (or those working on behalf of an investigative agency) that act with reasonable diligence before making a demand for records.[1]

Single Consent

The Final Rule “allows a single consent for all future uses and disclosures for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations.”[2]

Updated Content Requirements for Notice of Privacy Practices

The Final Rule creates specific content requirements that a Part 2 program must include in its Notice of Privacy Practices (“Notice”).[3]

A Part 2 Program must include specific information in the header of its Notice, including notifying patients of (1) how their health information may be used and disclosed; (2) their rights with respect to their health information; (3) how to file a complaint concerning a violation of the privacy or security of their health information; (4) their rights concerning their information, and (5) their right to have a copy of the Notice upon request.

In addition, a Part 2 program must include specific descriptions of how it will use and disclose patient records, a list of patients’ rights, such as the right to request restrictions of certain disclosures, a description of how a patient may exercise those rights, and a statement detailing the duties of the Part 2 program.

SUD Counseling Notes

Part 2 creates a new definition describing SUD counseling notes. Under Part 2, SUD counseling notes are “notes recorded (in any medium) by a Part 2 program provider who is a SUD or mental health professional documenting or analyzing the contents of conversation during a private SUD counseling session or a group, joint, or family SUD counseling session and that are separated from the rest of the patient's SUD and medical record.” [4]

The Final Rule mandates that a Part 2 program must obtain consent for any use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes, except:

  • To carry out the following treatment, payment, or health care operations:
    • Use by the originator of the SUD counseling notes for treatment;
    • Use or disclosure by the Part 2 program for its own training programs in which students, trainees, or practitioners in SUD treatment or mental health learn under supervision to practice or improve their skills in group, joint, family, or individual SUD counseling; or
    • Use or disclosure by the Part 2 program to defend itself in a legal action or other proceeding brought by the patient.
  • Use or disclosure that is required or permitted with respect to the oversight of the originator of the SUD counseling notes.[5]

The Final Rule also adds clarification that a written consent for a use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes may only be combined with another written consent for a use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes.[6]

Next Steps

Practices and providers will want to ensure that any policies are up to date and reflect the changes that are now enforceable under Part 2. We recommend engaging an attorney to review or update your current policies in order to ensure compliance with Part 2 updates.

To learn more about how the updates to 42 CFR Part 2 could impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001. 

[1] 42 CFR Sec. 2.3. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12474 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[2] 42 CFR Sec. 2.33. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12476 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf. See also, Fact Sheet 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, available at https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/regulatory-initiatives/fact-sheet-42-cfr-part-2-final-rule/index.html#ftn1.

[3] 42 CFR Sec. 2.22, See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12475 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[4] 42 CFR Sec. 2.11. See also, 42 CFR Sec. 2.12. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12474-12475 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[5] 42 CFR Sec. 2.31. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12476 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[6] Id.

HealthcareHealth LawHealthcare PolicyJeana Singleton
Client Alert

The Masks Are Back: New OSHA Regulations for Healthcare Employers

June 11, 2021Employment Law After Hours is back with a News Break Episode. Yesterday, OSHA published new rules for healthcare facilities, including hospitals, home health employers, nursing homes, ambulance companies, and assisted living facilities. These new rules are very cumbersome, requiring mask wearing for all employees, even those that are vaccinated. The only exception is for fully vaccinated employees (2 weeks post final dose) who are in a "well-defined" area where there is no reasonable expectation that any person with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 will be present.Client Alert

New OSHA Guidance for Workplaces Not Covered by the Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard

June 11, 2021On June 10, 2021, OSHA issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for occupational exposure to COVID-19, but it applies only to healthcare and healthcare support service workers. For a detailed summary of the ETS applicable to the healthcare industry, please visit https://youtu.be/vPyXmKwOzsk. All employers not subject to the ETS should review OSHA’s contemporaneously released, updated Guidance on Mitigating and Preventing the Spread of COVID-19 in the Workplace. The new Guidance essentially leaves intact OSHA’s earlier guidance, but only for unvaccinated and otherwise at-risk workers (“at-risk” meaning vaccinated or unvaccinated workers with immunocompromising conditions). For fully vaccinated workers, OSHA defers to CDC Guidance for Fully Vaccinated People, which advises that most fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing masks or physically distancing, except where required by federal, state, or local laws or individual business policies.Client Alert

Employer Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

June 9, 2021As employers encourage or require employees to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, they should be aware of OSHA recording obligations and potential workers’ compensation liability. Though OSHA has yet to revise its COVID-19 guidance in response to the latest CDC recommendations, OSHA has revised its position regarding the recording of injury or illness resulting from the vaccine. Until now, OSHA required an employer to record an adverse reaction when the vaccine was required for employees and the injury or illness otherwise met the recording criteria (work-related, a new case, and meets one or more of the general recording criteria). OSHA has reversed course and announced that it will not require recording adverse reactions until at least May 2022, irrespective of whether the employer requires the vaccine as a condition of employment. In its revised COVID-19 FAQs, OSHA states:Client Alert

The New Rule 1.510 - Radical Change for Summary Judgement Procedure in Florida

June 8, 2021In civil litigation, where both sides participate actively, trial is usually required at the end of a long, expensive case to determine a winner and a loser. In federal and most state courts, however, there are a few procedural shortcuts by which parties can seek to prevail in advance of trial, saving time, money and annoyance. The most common of these is the “motion for summary judgment”: a request to the court by one side for judgment before trial, generally on the basis that the evidence available reflects that a win for that party is legally inevitable and thus required. Effective May 1, 2021, summary judgment procedure in Florida has radically changed.Client Alert

Vacating, Modifying or Correcting an Arbitration Award Under R.C. 2711.13: Three-Month Limitation Maximum; Not Guaranteed Amount of Time

June 8, 2021In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. R.C. 2711.13 provides that “after an award in an arbitration proceeding is made, any party to the arbitration may file a motion in the court of common pleas for an order vacating, modifying, or correcting the award.” Any such motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award “must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is delivered to the parties in interest.” In BST Ohio Corporation et al. v. Wolgang, the Court held the three-month period set forth in R.C. 2711.13 is not a guaranteed time period in which to file a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award. 2021-Ohio-1785.
Older posts
Newer posts