Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Supreme Court Upholds CMS Vaccination Mandate for Health Care Providers

Client Alert

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the COVID-19 vaccine-or-test mandate for employers with more than 100 employees (the OSHA ETS) and upheld the COVID-19 vaccination mandate for employees of health care providers who receive Medicaid or Medicare funding (the CMS rule).

What This Means for Healthcare Providers

Health care providers – regardless of number of employees – who receive Medicaid or Medicare funding must require their employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The vaccination requirements apply to Medicare and Medicaid-certified provider and supplier types that are regulated under the Medicare health and safety standards known as Conditions of Participation (CoPs), Conditions for Coverage (CfCs), or Requirements[1]. Provider and supplier types to which the vaccine mandate applies are as follows:

  • Ambulatory Surgery Centers
  • Community Mental Health Centers
  • Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
  • Critical Access Hospitals, End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities
  • Home Health Agencies, Home Infusion Therapy Suppliers
  • Hospices
  • Hospitals
  • Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities
  • Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as Providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services
  • Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities (PRTFs)
  • Programs for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly Organizations (PACE)
  • Rural Health Clinics
  • Federally Qualified Health Centers
  • Long-Term Care Facilities

According to CMS, the vaccination mandate applies to employees, licensed practitioners, students, trainees, and volunteers regardless of clinical responsibility or patient contact. The mandate also includes individuals who provide care, treatment, or other services for the facility and/or its patients under contract or other arrangements. The mandate is not limited to staff who perform their duties solely within a formal clinical setting, as many health care staff routinely care for patients and clients outside of such facilities (e.g. home health, home infusion therapy, etc.). However, individuals who provide services 100% remotely and who do not have any direct contact with patients and other staff (e.g., fully remote telehealth or payroll services) are not subject to the CMS vaccine mandate.

In late December, a handful of federal courts halted the vaccine mandate in 25 states[2]. For the other states in which the mandate remained effective, CMS announced a January 27, 2022, deadline for phase 1 implementation, and February 28, 2022, deadline for Phase 2 implementation. The regulation requires providers to establish a process or policy to fulfill the vaccination requirements over two phases.

For Phase 1, within 30 days after the guidance is posted, staff at health care providers included within the regulation must have received, at a minimum, the first dose of a primary series or a single dose COVID-19 vaccine prior to staff providing any care, treatment, or other services for the provider and/or its patients. Providers with below 100% compliance will receive notice of their noncompliance but as long as the provider is above 80% and has a plan to achieve 100% staff vaccination within 60 days, it will not be subject to additional enforcement action.

For Phase 2, within 60 days after the guidance is posted, staff at health care provider and supplier types included in the regulation must complete the primary vaccination series (except for those who have been granted exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccine or those staff for whom COVID-19 vaccination must be temporarily delayed, as recommended by CDC). If the deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, it will be effective on the next business day. A provider that is above 90% on this date and has a plan to achieve a 100% staff vaccination rate within 30 days will not be subject to additional enforcement action.

CMS has not yet indicated whether this implementation timeline will be effective for the states in which the CMS mandate was on hold or if implementation will be slightly delayed. CMS should issue guidance on this and other matters soon, though it is not advisable for providers to delay implementation of mandatory vaccination efforts for their employees.

For More Information

For questions, please reach out to Daphne Kackloudis (dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com). Also, check out BMD’s Employment Law After Hours episode discussing the Supreme Court’s decision and what it means for employers and the future of the OSHA ETS regulations: https://youtu.be/8SZWzErB-H8.

[1] CoPs, CfCs, and Requirements are foundational health and safety standards. These standards cover 21 health care provider and supplier types.

[2] Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming


LGBTQIA+ Patients and Discrimination in Healthcare

In early April, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a study outlining the challenges that LGBT adults face in the United States related to healthcare. According to the study, LGBT patients are “twice as likely as non-LGBT adults to report negative experiences while receiving health care in the last three years, including being treated unfairly or with disrespect (33% v. 15%) or having at least one of several other negative experiences with a provider (61% v. 31%), including a provider assuming something about them without asking, suggesting they were personally to blame for a health problem, ignoring a direct request or question, or refusing to prescribe needed pain medication.”

Ohio Recovery Housing Overhaul: New Standards and Certification Requirements Reshape Sober Living Spaces

Ensuring Fair Access: SB 269 Protects Affordable Medication for Low-Income Patients

SB 269, introduced on December 19, 2023, will ensure that 340B covered entities, including Federally Qualified Health Centers, Ryan White Clinics, disproportionate share hospitals, and Title X clinics, can acquire 340B drugs without facing undue restrictions or discriminatory practices from drug manufacturers and distributors. This protection is crucial for 340B covered entities to continue to provide affordable medications and comprehensive services to low-income patients.

Unveiling Ohio's Pharmacy Board Updates for Distributors, Mobile Clinics, and Controlled Substances

The Ohio Board of Pharmacy will hold a public hearing on May 28, 2024, to discuss several proposed changes and additions to Ohio Administrative Code (OAC). These changes pertain to terminal distributors of dangerous drugs (TDDDs), mobile clinics or medication units, and the classification of controlled substances.

House Bill 249: Key Updates to Involuntary Hospitalization Law for Mental Health Providers

House Bill 249 (HB 249) proposes changes to Ohio Revised Code (ORC) Sections 5122.01 and 5122.10 to expand the conditions under which a person with a mental illness can be involuntarily hospitalized.