Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Supreme Court Upholds CMS Vaccination Mandate for Health Care Providers

Client Alert

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the COVID-19 vaccine-or-test mandate for employers with more than 100 employees (the OSHA ETS) and upheld the COVID-19 vaccination mandate for employees of health care providers who receive Medicaid or Medicare funding (the CMS rule).

What This Means for Healthcare Providers

Health care providers – regardless of number of employees – who receive Medicaid or Medicare funding must require their employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The vaccination requirements apply to Medicare and Medicaid-certified provider and supplier types that are regulated under the Medicare health and safety standards known as Conditions of Participation (CoPs), Conditions for Coverage (CfCs), or Requirements[1]. Provider and supplier types to which the vaccine mandate applies are as follows:

  • Ambulatory Surgery Centers
  • Community Mental Health Centers
  • Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
  • Critical Access Hospitals, End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities
  • Home Health Agencies, Home Infusion Therapy Suppliers
  • Hospices
  • Hospitals
  • Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities
  • Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as Providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services
  • Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities (PRTFs)
  • Programs for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly Organizations (PACE)
  • Rural Health Clinics
  • Federally Qualified Health Centers
  • Long-Term Care Facilities

According to CMS, the vaccination mandate applies to employees, licensed practitioners, students, trainees, and volunteers regardless of clinical responsibility or patient contact. The mandate also includes individuals who provide care, treatment, or other services for the facility and/or its patients under contract or other arrangements. The mandate is not limited to staff who perform their duties solely within a formal clinical setting, as many health care staff routinely care for patients and clients outside of such facilities (e.g. home health, home infusion therapy, etc.). However, individuals who provide services 100% remotely and who do not have any direct contact with patients and other staff (e.g., fully remote telehealth or payroll services) are not subject to the CMS vaccine mandate.

In late December, a handful of federal courts halted the vaccine mandate in 25 states[2]. For the other states in which the mandate remained effective, CMS announced a January 27, 2022, deadline for phase 1 implementation, and February 28, 2022, deadline for Phase 2 implementation. The regulation requires providers to establish a process or policy to fulfill the vaccination requirements over two phases.

For Phase 1, within 30 days after the guidance is posted, staff at health care providers included within the regulation must have received, at a minimum, the first dose of a primary series or a single dose COVID-19 vaccine prior to staff providing any care, treatment, or other services for the provider and/or its patients. Providers with below 100% compliance will receive notice of their noncompliance but as long as the provider is above 80% and has a plan to achieve 100% staff vaccination within 60 days, it will not be subject to additional enforcement action.

For Phase 2, within 60 days after the guidance is posted, staff at health care provider and supplier types included in the regulation must complete the primary vaccination series (except for those who have been granted exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccine or those staff for whom COVID-19 vaccination must be temporarily delayed, as recommended by CDC). If the deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, it will be effective on the next business day. A provider that is above 90% on this date and has a plan to achieve a 100% staff vaccination rate within 30 days will not be subject to additional enforcement action.

CMS has not yet indicated whether this implementation timeline will be effective for the states in which the CMS mandate was on hold or if implementation will be slightly delayed. CMS should issue guidance on this and other matters soon, though it is not advisable for providers to delay implementation of mandatory vaccination efforts for their employees.

For More Information

For questions, please reach out to Daphne Kackloudis (dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com). Also, check out BMD’s Employment Law After Hours episode discussing the Supreme Court’s decision and what it means for employers and the future of the OSHA ETS regulations: https://youtu.be/8SZWzErB-H8.

[1] CoPs, CfCs, and Requirements are foundational health and safety standards. These standards cover 21 health care provider and supplier types.

[2] Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming


Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.