Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

The Second Wave of UnitedHealthcare's Prior Authorization Cuts Started in November

Client Alert

In August 2023, UnitedHealthcare released its plan to eliminate roughly one-fifth of its then-current prior authorization requirements. The first round of prior authorization cuts took effect on September 1, 2023. In that round, UnitedHealthcare eliminated the necessity for some prior authorizations for UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage, UnitedHealthcare commercial, UnitedHealthcare Oxford and UnitedHealthcare Individual Exchange plan members. The second and final round of prior authorization cuts began on November 1, 2023. The November 2023 Prior Authorization Cuts apply to the same plans as well as community plans (i.e., Medicaid managed care plans).

UnitedHealthcare’s Prior Authorization Cuts

The prior authorization cuts are part of UnitedHealthcare’s comprehensive effort to simplify the healthcare experience for members and providers. In sum, the cuts account for nearly 20% of UnitedHealthcare’s overall prior authorization volume.

The prior authorization process requires a patient to obtain approval from their health plan before proceeding with a medical service. The process results in barriers to timely care for patients, and is expensive, inefficient, and administratively burdensome for providers. Payers claim that providers do not always make appropriate, high-value healthcare decisions for their patients.

Starting November 1, 2023, some prior authorization codes procedures in cardiology, genetic testing, hysterectomy, spine surgery, radiology, arthroplasty, vein procedures and site of service sterilization were removed. Examples include:

  • Spine surgery codes 22864 (removal disc arthroplasty anterior 1 interspace cervical), 22865 (removal disc arthroplasty anterior 1 interspace lumbar), and 0095T (removal total disc arthroscopy anterior approach, each additional interspace, cervical); and
  • Cardiology codes 93303 (complete transthoracic echocardiography for congenital cardiac anomalies), 93304 (transthoracic echocardiography for congenital cardiac anomalies; follow-up or limited study), and 93306 (performing and interpreting of a complete transthoracic echocardiogram). 

Prior Authorization Cuts Are Becoming a Trend

UnitedHealthcare is not the only payer that has announced prior authorization cuts this year. In August 2023, Cigna Healthcare removed roughly 25% of medical services from prior authorization requirements. This cut encompassed more than 600 codes, including roughly 100 surgical codes and 200 genetic testing codes, in addition to codes for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, and other services. Additionally, in September 2023, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan announced that it was cutting approximately 20% of its prior authorization requirements and expanding its gold card program, which adjusts prior authorization requirements for providers with a track record of high-quality care and a high approval rating over six months or more.

In 2024, United Healthcare plans to implement a national gold card program for provider groups that meet eligibility requirements. Instead of adhering to the prior authorization process, qualifying providers in the program will follow a simplified notification process. UnitedHealthcare is set to publish informational guidance on this program before the end of the year.

If you have questions about the prior authorization process or UnitedHealthcare's prior authorization cuts, please contact your local BMD Healthcare Attorneys Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.


Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.