Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

The Second Wave of UnitedHealthcare's Prior Authorization Cuts Started in November

Client Alert

In August 2023, UnitedHealthcare released its plan to eliminate roughly one-fifth of its then-current prior authorization requirements. The first round of prior authorization cuts took effect on September 1, 2023. In that round, UnitedHealthcare eliminated the necessity for some prior authorizations for UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage, UnitedHealthcare commercial, UnitedHealthcare Oxford and UnitedHealthcare Individual Exchange plan members. The second and final round of prior authorization cuts began on November 1, 2023. The November 2023 Prior Authorization Cuts apply to the same plans as well as community plans (i.e., Medicaid managed care plans).

UnitedHealthcare’s Prior Authorization Cuts

The prior authorization cuts are part of UnitedHealthcare’s comprehensive effort to simplify the healthcare experience for members and providers. In sum, the cuts account for nearly 20% of UnitedHealthcare’s overall prior authorization volume.

The prior authorization process requires a patient to obtain approval from their health plan before proceeding with a medical service. The process results in barriers to timely care for patients, and is expensive, inefficient, and administratively burdensome for providers. Payers claim that providers do not always make appropriate, high-value healthcare decisions for their patients.

Starting November 1, 2023, some prior authorization codes procedures in cardiology, genetic testing, hysterectomy, spine surgery, radiology, arthroplasty, vein procedures and site of service sterilization were removed. Examples include:

  • Spine surgery codes 22864 (removal disc arthroplasty anterior 1 interspace cervical), 22865 (removal disc arthroplasty anterior 1 interspace lumbar), and 0095T (removal total disc arthroscopy anterior approach, each additional interspace, cervical); and
  • Cardiology codes 93303 (complete transthoracic echocardiography for congenital cardiac anomalies), 93304 (transthoracic echocardiography for congenital cardiac anomalies; follow-up or limited study), and 93306 (performing and interpreting of a complete transthoracic echocardiogram). 

Prior Authorization Cuts Are Becoming a Trend

UnitedHealthcare is not the only payer that has announced prior authorization cuts this year. In August 2023, Cigna Healthcare removed roughly 25% of medical services from prior authorization requirements. This cut encompassed more than 600 codes, including roughly 100 surgical codes and 200 genetic testing codes, in addition to codes for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, and other services. Additionally, in September 2023, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan announced that it was cutting approximately 20% of its prior authorization requirements and expanding its gold card program, which adjusts prior authorization requirements for providers with a track record of high-quality care and a high approval rating over six months or more.

In 2024, United Healthcare plans to implement a national gold card program for provider groups that meet eligibility requirements. Instead of adhering to the prior authorization process, qualifying providers in the program will follow a simplified notification process. UnitedHealthcare is set to publish informational guidance on this program before the end of the year.

If you have questions about the prior authorization process or UnitedHealthcare's prior authorization cuts, please contact your local BMD Healthcare Attorneys Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.


What Inpatient Behavioral Health Providers Need to Know About ODM's New Draft Rule for Reimbursements

Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) recently released a draft rule that will transform how inpatient behavioral health services are reimbursed for some hospitals. ODM will migrate inpatient payments for behavioral health and substance use disorder services (BH/SUD) provided by freestanding psychiatric hospitals (FSPs) from the APR-DRG payment methodology to a per diem payment methodology derived from the APR-DRG system.

BMD Named to the 2024 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms”

Brennan Manna & Diamond (BMD) is recognized among the leading law firms in the nation according to the 2024 Edition of U.S. News – Best Lawyers®  "Best Law Firms." The firm has ranked in in 13 practice areas and has earned “National Tier 1” rankings in Health Care Law and Litigation-Trusts & Estates.

Friendly Physician Models: The Basics Through 5 Frequently Asked Questions

During the past several years, many health law practices have noticed a dramatic increase in the number of telehealth businesses and private equity backed health care providers. Both of these trends often rely heavily on corporate structures commonly referred to as “friendly physician,” “captive PC” or “MSO” models. Although friendly physician models are used by non-physician health care providers (e.g., physical therapists, psychologists, and dentists), this article focuses on physicians and how the model is used in connection with the provision of professional medical services.

The DOL and EEOC Enter a Partnership to Strengthen Federal Employment Law Enforcement

On September 13, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to work together in enforcing federal employment laws. The MOU forms a partnership between the two agencies to encourage coordination through information sharing, joint investigations, training, and outreach.

Proposed Laboratory Arrangement Draws Heightened Scrutiny from the OIG

On September 25, 2023, the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) issued Advisory Opinion 23-06 (AO). The Opinion involved a proposed arrangement between an independent laboratory and other physician laboratories for the purchase of the technical component of anatomic pathology services. The OIG ultimately concluded that the arrangement at issue, if it was entered into with the requisite intent, would implicate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and constitute grounds for sanctions.