Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

The Second Wave of UnitedHealthcare's Prior Authorization Cuts Started in November

Client Alert

In August 2023, UnitedHealthcare released its plan to eliminate roughly one-fifth of its then-current prior authorization requirements. The first round of prior authorization cuts took effect on September 1, 2023. In that round, UnitedHealthcare eliminated the necessity for some prior authorizations for UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage, UnitedHealthcare commercial, UnitedHealthcare Oxford and UnitedHealthcare Individual Exchange plan members. The second and final round of prior authorization cuts began on November 1, 2023. The November 2023 Prior Authorization Cuts apply to the same plans as well as community plans (i.e., Medicaid managed care plans).

UnitedHealthcare’s Prior Authorization Cuts

The prior authorization cuts are part of UnitedHealthcare’s comprehensive effort to simplify the healthcare experience for members and providers. In sum, the cuts account for nearly 20% of UnitedHealthcare’s overall prior authorization volume.

The prior authorization process requires a patient to obtain approval from their health plan before proceeding with a medical service. The process results in barriers to timely care for patients, and is expensive, inefficient, and administratively burdensome for providers. Payers claim that providers do not always make appropriate, high-value healthcare decisions for their patients.

Starting November 1, 2023, some prior authorization codes procedures in cardiology, genetic testing, hysterectomy, spine surgery, radiology, arthroplasty, vein procedures and site of service sterilization were removed. Examples include:

  • Spine surgery codes 22864 (removal disc arthroplasty anterior 1 interspace cervical), 22865 (removal disc arthroplasty anterior 1 interspace lumbar), and 0095T (removal total disc arthroscopy anterior approach, each additional interspace, cervical); and
  • Cardiology codes 93303 (complete transthoracic echocardiography for congenital cardiac anomalies), 93304 (transthoracic echocardiography for congenital cardiac anomalies; follow-up or limited study), and 93306 (performing and interpreting of a complete transthoracic echocardiogram). 

Prior Authorization Cuts Are Becoming a Trend

UnitedHealthcare is not the only payer that has announced prior authorization cuts this year. In August 2023, Cigna Healthcare removed roughly 25% of medical services from prior authorization requirements. This cut encompassed more than 600 codes, including roughly 100 surgical codes and 200 genetic testing codes, in addition to codes for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, and other services. Additionally, in September 2023, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan announced that it was cutting approximately 20% of its prior authorization requirements and expanding its gold card program, which adjusts prior authorization requirements for providers with a track record of high-quality care and a high approval rating over six months or more.

In 2024, United Healthcare plans to implement a national gold card program for provider groups that meet eligibility requirements. Instead of adhering to the prior authorization process, qualifying providers in the program will follow a simplified notification process. UnitedHealthcare is set to publish informational guidance on this program before the end of the year.

If you have questions about the prior authorization process or UnitedHealthcare's prior authorization cuts, please contact your local BMD Healthcare Attorneys Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.


Employment Law After Hours: CDC SAYS NO MORE MASKS FOR VACCINATED PEOPLE: What does this mean for employers and employees?

This morning, ELAH published an emergency episode discussing the questions employers sent us since the CDC’s release of its revised mask guidance late last week. This episode explores questions such as whether an employer can allow vaccinated people to go without masks, while requiring unvaccinated people to wear a mask, whether employers can inspect an employee’s vaccine card, and it discusses the risks of liability an employer faces based on the decisions and policies it makes following the release of this CDC guidance, along with many other questions.

COVID, Privacy and More! New Challenges for Physicians in 2021

While hopefully we are coming out of the pandemic, the legal repercussions related to legislative initiatives and other actions during that time continue to apply to businesses in general and healthcare practices. It is a helpful reminder that practices make certain that they maintain accurate records in order to satisfy the reporting requirements under the various COVID-related bills and protect yourself from future employment claims.

Banking and Cannabis: Bank Lending, The Next Frontier

A fortuitous combination of developments and circumstances present the banking and cannabis industries a large opportunity to enhance each of their respective bottom lines: conventional bank lending, payment processing, treasury management and other services, and bank administered SBA and revenue bond financing to cannabis businesses.

EKRA Updates: COVID-19 Testing, Employment Agreements, and More

Ever since the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (“EKRA”) was passed by Congress in 2018, we have been waiting to see how the law is interpreted and ultimately enforced. As a reminder, EKRA seeks to eliminate kickbacks in return for patient referrals to facilities that treat those overcoming addiction, such as recovery homes, clinical treatment centers, and laboratories. (NOTE: EKRA applies to all laboratories, not just those related to addiction treatment.) It is essentially an expansion of the Anti-Kickback Statute, which only applies to those services that are reimbursable through federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, to now also cover services reimbursable through private insurers.

New Interpretation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Rocks the Industry

It’s not lost on us that our interpretation of § 1692c(b) runs the risk of upsetting the status quo in the debt-collection industry. This quote from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal in its April 21, 2021 opinion from the case of Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. is possibly the biggest understatement in the history of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. At a minimum, the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion has sent shockwaves and fear throughout multiple sectors of the financial services industry.