Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

USCIS Policy Change Impacting Work Authorization: Advisory for Employers and Human Resources

Client Alert
December 8, 2025

On December 2, 2025, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0192 ordering an immediate pause on processing immigration benefits for individuals whose country of birth or citizenship is one of 19 designated “high-risk” countries. USCIS also mandated a re-review of many previously approved immigration benefits for individuals from these countries who entered the U.S. on or after January 20, 2021.

This memo has direct consequences for employment authorization, reverification, and overall workforce stability.

Who Is Affected?

1. Employees born in or citizens of the following countries may face delays or disruptions in work authorization:

Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Mali, Nicaragua, North Korea, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen.

2. Any employee who entered the United States after January 20, 2021 and received work authorization or a green card through the asylum process.

Key Impacts on Employers

1. Delays or Loss of Work Authorization

Employees from affected countries may not be able to renew their Employment Authorization Documents (EADs).
Because USCIS previously reduced automatic extension policies, some employees may lose work authorization immediately upon expiration.

2. Re-Review of Previously Approved Status

Even employees with asylum, permanent residency (green cards), TPS, pending adjustment, or long-standing EADs, and who entered the United States after January 20, 2021 may undergo mandatory re-screening.

USCIS may:

  • Request new interviews
  • Re-open previously approved cases
  • Suspend or revoke status if security concerns are identified

This may occur without advance notice.

3. Mandatory I-9 Compliance

Employers must continue to ensure that every employee maintains valid work authorization.
Failure to re-verify documents or employing an unauthorized worker may result in:

  • Civil fines
  • Criminal penalties for repeat violations
  • Debarment from federal contracts
  • Increased audit exposure during this heightened enforcement period

Recommended HR Actions

  • Review Your Workforce: Identify employees who may be affected based on nationality or birth country. Confirm work authorization expiration dates and update internal tracking systems.
  • Communicate Early: Inform affected employees about the USCIS freeze and encourage them to consult immigration counsel. Advise employees not to travel internationally without legal guidance.
  • Strengthen I-9 Procedures: Ensure reverification systems are updated and reminders are in place. Document all good-faith compliance efforts in case of an audit.
  • Prepare Operational Contingency Plans: Since employees may lose authorization unexpectedly, prepare plans to prevent business disruption, including coverage for key roles.

If you have any questions about how this USCIS policy change may impact your workforce or compliance obligations, please contact BMD Immigration Attorney and Member Rob Ratliff at raratliff@bmdllc.com.

Workforce Enforcement of Immigration LawsImmigrationImmigration LawUSCISRobert Ratliff
Client Alert

New Ohio Reporting Requirements for Non-Residential Contractors

March 18, 2026Ohio’s E-Verify Workforce Integrity Act, effective March 19, 2026, requires all nonresidential construction companies, subcontractors, and labor brokers to use E-Verify to confirm employee work eligibility on projects across the state. The law applies regardless of company size and carries financial penalties and potential restrictions on future state contracts for noncompliance. Some uncertainty remains around requirements for existing employees, making early compliance planning important.Client Alert

DOT Non-Domiciled CDL Rule

March 11, 2026A new rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will significantly narrow eligibility for non-domiciled Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) beginning March 16, 2026. The rule limits eligibility to holders of H-2A, H-2B, and E-2 visas and eliminates Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) as qualifying proof of work authorization. As a result, many lawfully present and work-authorized immigrants, including refugees, asylees, DACA recipients, and Temporary Protected Status holders, will no longer be able to obtain or renew a non-domiciled CDL. The change is expected to affect roughly 194,000 drivers nationwide and has prompted multiple legal challenges, including a pending emergency stay request before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.Client Alert

FinCEN Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule Now in Effect

March 6, 2026FinCEN’s new Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule, effective March 1, 2026, requires certain real estate transfers to be reported to combat financial crimes. Transfers of residential property to entities or trusts without financing may require a Real Estate Report.Client Alert

Department of Education Proposes Redefinition of “Professional Degree,” Excluding Nursing and Limiting Graduate Loan Borrowing

February 20, 2026The U.S. Department of Education has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would redefine “professional degree” programs under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The proposal excludes nursing from the recognized list and would impose new borrowing limits for graduate students while eliminating the Grad PLUS program. Public comments are due by March 2, 2026.Client Alert

First-of-Its-Kind Federal Ruling Finds Use of Consumer AI Tool May Destroy Attorney-Client Privilege

February 17, 2026On February 10, 2026, Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a first-of-its-kind ruling finding that documents generated by a criminal defendant using a consumer AI platform were not protected by attorney-client privilege after being shared with counsel. The court treated the AI tool as a third party, concluding that entering sensitive information into a publicly available platform may waive confidentiality. The ruling also suggests that the work product doctrine may not apply where AI-generated materials are created independently by a client rather than at counsel’s direction. The decision signals that parties should exercise caution when using consumer AI tools in connection with legal matters.
Older posts
Newer posts