Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Chemical Dependency Professionals Board Rule Changes: Part 2

Client Alert
April 1, 2024

The below rule changes are effective on April 1, 2024. For questions about these rules, contact BMD attorney Daphne Kackloudis.

Requirements for Certification of Chemical Dependency Counselor Assistants (CDCA) - OAC 4758-5-01

Now, under the amended rule, a certified chemical dependency counselor assistant (CDCA) will be certified for a preliminary, non-renewable thirteen-month period if they meet the requirements under this rule. Specifically, an applicant must (1) be eighteen (18) years old and hold a high school diploma or equivalent and (2) submit a formal application, pay an application fee, and provide a personal attestation statement agreeing to practice by the code of ethical standards adopted by the board. Additionally, the applicant must now complete forty (40) hours of approved substance use disorder specific education in the topics set by the board.

Scope of Practice for Chemical Dependency Counselor Assistants (CDCA) - OAC 4758-6-01

Under the rule, a chemical dependency counselor assistant (CDCA) can provide family counseling within their scope of practice in addition to treatment planning, assessment, crisis intervention, individual counseling, group counseling, case management, and education services. Previously, a CDCA could not provide family counseling to their patients.

Code of Ethics for Chemical Dependency Counselors - OAC 4758-8-01

The amended rule sets forth the minimum standards of practice for certified chemical dependency counselor assistants (CDCA), licensed chemical dependency counselors II (LCDCII), licensed chemical dependency counselors III (LCDCIII), licensed independent chemical dependency counselors (LICDC), licensed independent chemical dependency counselors-clinical supervisors (LICDC-CS), and those licensees who carry the gambling disorder endorsement.

Specifically, licensees or certificate holders should never discriminate against clients on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, religion, age, national ancestry, genetic information, parental status, military status, socioeconomic status, political belief, psychiatric or psychological conditions, and disability, the amount of previous therapeutic or treatment occurrences, or against other persons that could be subject to discrimination but are not expressly protected by state or federal law. The amended rule adds gender identity or expression, genetic information, parental status, and military status as protected categories.

Further, the amended rule adds language imposing an obligation on licensees or certificate holders to protect the clients’ right to confidentiality. The amended rule says that confidential information may only be revealed to others when the clients, or other persons legally authorized to give consent on the behalf of the clients, have given their informed and written consent, unless there is a serious and current or imminent threat of harm to the client of others or as otherwise authorized by law.

The amended rule also states that licensees or certificate holders should maintain objective and non-possessive relationships with clients and not maintain a conflict of interest with any client, former client, family member of a client or a former client, or other person encountered in professional or non-professional settings, which may impair professional judgment, increase the risk of exploitation, or not be in the best interest of a client at any time.

Under the amended rule, a license or certificate holder is prohibited from engaging in any type of sexual conduct or sexual relationship with a current client and should never provide services to anyone in which they have had a prior sexual relationship. Additionally, a licensee or certificate holder is prohibited from having a sexual relationship or any form of sexual conduct with a former client within the two (2) years, at a minimum, following the termination of professional services. However, a licensee or certificate holder should never have a sexual relationship with a former client if such relationship is not in the best interest of the client or increases the risk of exploitation. Sexual conduct is any consensual or non-consensual contact with another person that a reasonable person may consider sexual or sexual in nature, including but not limited to: sexual relationship; sexual advance; sexual solicitation; request for a sexual favor; a text, picture, or video or social media post of a sexual nature; or any other verbal, non-verbal, or physical activity, contact, or conduct that is sexual or sexual in nature.

Further, under the amended rule, a licensee or certificate holder is explicitly prohibited from sexually harassing a client, or they risk the revocation of their license or certificate. Sexual harassment includes any activity, contact, or conduct that a reasonable person may consider offensive or harassing that is sexual or sexual in nature, including but not limited to: sexual advance; sexual solicitation; request for a sexual favor; a text, picture, or video or social media post of a sexual nature; or any other verbal, non-verbal, or physical activity, contact, or conduct that is sexually offensive or harassing.

Importantly, this amended rule now applies to licensees or certificate holders employed to work in any capacity in recovery housing. Residents in recovery housing are considered clients of the licensee or certificate holder.

Code of Ethics for Clinical Supervisors - OAC 4758-8-02

The purpose of this rule is to state the rules of conduct that apply to individuals who hold a valid independent chemical dependency counselor-clinical supervisor license (LICDC-CS), independent chemical dependency counselor license (LICDC) or chemical dependency counselor III license (LCDC III) during the performance of their clinical duties as supervisors.

The amended rule adds the requirement that supervision be maintained through regular face-to-face meetings, which could include video conferencing, with a supervisee or supervisees in group or individual sessions. Sessions should also include documentation of the content of the session, which should be signed by both the supervisor and supervisee if required by certifying or accrediting bodies.

Further, the amended rule adds language that supervision must be provided in a professional and consistent manner to all supervisees regardless of age, race, ethnicity, color, sex, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, religion, genetic information, parental status, military status, physical disability, sexual orientation, political affiliation or belief, marital or social or economic socioeconomic status, psychiatric or psychological conditions, disability, or other identifying traits that could subject an individual to discrimination but are not expressly protected by state or federal law.

Please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com with any questions.

Daphne Kackloudisjordan burdick
Client Alert

UPDATE: Governor Dewine Signs HB 606 Granting Short Window of Immunity from COVID-19 Personal Injury Lawsuits

September 15, 2020The Ohio General Assembly, in Am. Sub. H.B. No. 606, is in the final stages of passing a law that will prohibit lawsuits seeking damages from COVID-19. This includes injury, death, or loss to person or property if the lawsuits are based, in whole or in part, on the exposure to, or the transmission or contraction of the coronavirus, unless the defendant in the lawsuit acted intentionally or recklessly. In circumstances where this immunity does not apply, H.B. 606 prohibits such claims being aggregated and brought as a class action.Client Alert

Revised Department of Labor FFCRA Guidance, Effective September 16, 2020

September 14, 2020In response to attacks on the legality of the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule regarding the Families First Coronavirus Act (“FFCRA” or the “Act”), which took effect in April 2020, the Department of Labor issued new guidance on Friday, September 11th to formally address ongoing questions and concerns related to the COVID-19 legislation.Client Alert

FCC Adds $198 Million to Strengthen Telehealth for Rural Healthcare Providers

September 9, 2020The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has added an additional $198 million in funding to its Rural Health Care Program. These funds will be used to increase broadband services and telecommunications to bolster telehealth/telemedicine services for rural healthcare providers. Funding for rural healthcare providers was initially capped at $605 million in 2020, but the added funds will now allow the FCC to provide over $800 million to eligible providers.Client Alert

Finding Opportunity in Adversity: Optimism for the Construction Industry

September 8, 2020Looking for good news? If so, you are not alone. Aside from the collective mental, physical and emotional human toll imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, entire sectors of the economy have been ravaged, and old, familiar ways of doing business have been disrupted. Although deemed essential, the construction industry has not been immune to interruption and uncertainty during these unprecedented times. Amid new health and safety concerns, coupled with financial uncertainty, progress on projects has slowed, and the start dates for a number of new projects slated to begin in 2020 have been deferred. However, resilience has always been a trademark of contractors, subcontractors and other industry professionals. Reports indicate that while the construction industry lost more than one million jobs February through April, at least 600,000 of those jobs had been gained back by the end of June.Client Alert

Yard Sign Do’s and Don’ts: How to Avoid Legal Challenges to Municipal Sign Codes this Election Season

September 8, 2020As the nation heads into the tail end of the 2020 general election, municipalities will inevitably face challenges as they seek to regulate the seasonal proliferation of yard signs on residential property. While the matter may seem trifling, a seemingly benign yet content-based sign ordinance can result in significant legal exposure for municipalities that have not heeded recent Supreme Court decisions on content neutrality.
Older posts
Newer posts