Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Chemical Dependency Professionals Board Rule Changes: Part 2

Client Alert

The below rule changes are effective on April 1, 2024. For questions about these rules, contact BMD attorney Daphne Kackloudis.

Requirements for Certification of Chemical Dependency Counselor Assistants (CDCA) - OAC 4758-5-01

Now, under the amended rule, a certified chemical dependency counselor assistant (CDCA) will be certified for a preliminary, non-renewable thirteen-month period if they meet the requirements under this rule. Specifically, an applicant must (1) be eighteen (18) years old and hold a high school diploma or equivalent and (2) submit a formal application, pay an application fee, and provide a personal attestation statement agreeing to practice by the code of ethical standards adopted by the board. Additionally, the applicant must now complete forty (40) hours of approved substance use disorder specific education in the topics set by the board.

Scope of Practice for Chemical Dependency Counselor Assistants (CDCA) - OAC 4758-6-01

Under the rule, a chemical dependency counselor assistant (CDCA) can provide family counseling within their scope of practice in addition to treatment planning, assessment, crisis intervention, individual counseling, group counseling, case management, and education services. Previously, a CDCA could not provide family counseling to their patients.

Code of Ethics for Chemical Dependency Counselors - OAC 4758-8-01

The amended rule sets forth the minimum standards of practice for certified chemical dependency counselor assistants (CDCA), licensed chemical dependency counselors II (LCDCII), licensed chemical dependency counselors III (LCDCIII), licensed independent chemical dependency counselors (LICDC), licensed independent chemical dependency counselors-clinical supervisors (LICDC-CS), and those licensees who carry the gambling disorder endorsement.

Specifically, licensees or certificate holders should never discriminate against clients on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, religion, age, national ancestry, genetic information, parental status, military status, socioeconomic status, political belief, psychiatric or psychological conditions, and disability, the amount of previous therapeutic or treatment occurrences, or against other persons that could be subject to discrimination but are not expressly protected by state or federal law. The amended rule adds gender identity or expression, genetic information, parental status, and military status as protected categories.

Further, the amended rule adds language imposing an obligation on licensees or certificate holders to protect the clients’ right to confidentiality. The amended rule says that confidential information may only be revealed to others when the clients, or other persons legally authorized to give consent on the behalf of the clients, have given their informed and written consent, unless there is a serious and current or imminent threat of harm to the client of others or as otherwise authorized by law.

The amended rule also states that licensees or certificate holders should maintain objective and non-possessive relationships with clients and not maintain a conflict of interest with any client, former client, family member of a client or a former client, or other person encountered in professional or non-professional settings, which may impair professional judgment, increase the risk of exploitation, or not be in the best interest of a client at any time.

Under the amended rule, a license or certificate holder is prohibited from engaging in any type of sexual conduct or sexual relationship with a current client and should never provide services to anyone in which they have had a prior sexual relationship. Additionally, a licensee or certificate holder is prohibited from having a sexual relationship or any form of sexual conduct with a former client within the two (2) years, at a minimum, following the termination of professional services. However, a licensee or certificate holder should never have a sexual relationship with a former client if such relationship is not in the best interest of the client or increases the risk of exploitation. Sexual conduct is any consensual or non-consensual contact with another person that a reasonable person may consider sexual or sexual in nature, including but not limited to: sexual relationship; sexual advance; sexual solicitation; request for a sexual favor; a text, picture, or video or social media post of a sexual nature; or any other verbal, non-verbal, or physical activity, contact, or conduct that is sexual or sexual in nature.

Further, under the amended rule, a licensee or certificate holder is explicitly prohibited from sexually harassing a client, or they risk the revocation of their license or certificate. Sexual harassment includes any activity, contact, or conduct that a reasonable person may consider offensive or harassing that is sexual or sexual in nature, including but not limited to: sexual advance; sexual solicitation; request for a sexual favor; a text, picture, or video or social media post of a sexual nature; or any other verbal, non-verbal, or physical activity, contact, or conduct that is sexually offensive or harassing.

Importantly, this amended rule now applies to licensees or certificate holders employed to work in any capacity in recovery housing. Residents in recovery housing are considered clients of the licensee or certificate holder.

Code of Ethics for Clinical Supervisors - OAC 4758-8-02

The purpose of this rule is to state the rules of conduct that apply to individuals who hold a valid independent chemical dependency counselor-clinical supervisor license (LICDC-CS), independent chemical dependency counselor license (LICDC) or chemical dependency counselor III license (LCDC III) during the performance of their clinical duties as supervisors.

The amended rule adds the requirement that supervision be maintained through regular face-to-face meetings, which could include video conferencing, with a supervisee or supervisees in group or individual sessions. Sessions should also include documentation of the content of the session, which should be signed by both the supervisor and supervisee if required by certifying or accrediting bodies.

Further, the amended rule adds language that supervision must be provided in a professional and consistent manner to all supervisees regardless of age, race, ethnicity, color, sex, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, religion, genetic information, parental status, military status, physical disability, sexual orientation, political affiliation or belief, marital or social or economic socioeconomic status, psychiatric or psychological conditions, disability, or other identifying traits that could subject an individual to discrimination but are not expressly protected by state or federal law.

Please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com with any questions.


Ohio Businesses Required to Post Exceptions to State-wide Mask Mandate at all Entrances

On July 22, 2020, in conjunction with the state-wide mask mandate instituted by Governor Mike DeWine, Lance D. Himes, Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, issued an order requiring Ohio businesses to post any permitted exceptions they provide to customers, patrons, visitors, contractors, vendors and similar individuals to use facial coverings at all business entrances.

ODM and OhioMHAS Continue to Expand Telehealth

On July 17, 2020, Governor DeWine signed Executive Order 2020-29D, which allowed the Ohio Department of Medicaid (“ODM”) to immediately rescind old provisions and file a new rule (5160-1-18) and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“OhioMHAS”) to amend their current rule (5122-29-31), both expanding telehealth and introducing even more flexibility into Ohio’s healthcare system.

Top Questions of Employers - Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law

One month ago, the United States Supreme Court, in Bostock v. Clayton County, determined that federal law (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) protects employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Our earlier post discussed the full decision. The purpose of this article is to share and address the Top Questions of Employers since that decision was rendered.

Healthcare Acquisitions and Divestitures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

It seems as though all aspects of our personal and professional lives have been impacted in one way or another by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Healthcare acquisitions and divestitures are no exception. Although the ramifications depend on the specific circumstances of each transaction, we are noticing certain common threads woven among recently closed and currently in progress transactions in the healthcare industry. Here are a few of the questions that often arise as we work with clients to navigate the current business landscape both during and after the COVID epidemic.

Ministerial Exception to Title VII

On July 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision holding that religious institutions, such as churches and religion-based schools, are shielded from employment discrimination lawsuits — including claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In doing so, the Court decided in favor of two Catholic schools facing legal discrimination claims from former teachers who alleged wrongful termination from their employment for age and disability.