Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Cleveland Joins the Pay Transparency Movement: What Employers Need to Know

Client Alert

Beginning October 27, 2025, all Cleveland employers with 15 or more employees will be prohibited from asking applicants about their pay history and will be required to include reasonable pay ranges in all job postings where the position will be performed, solicited, considered, or processed in Cleveland. The ordinance is intended to help close the gender wage gap and promote greater pay equity across the city.

Overview of the New Cleveland Law

On April 28, 2025, the Cleveland City Council passed Ordinance No. 104-2025, which requires employers to include pay ranges in job notifications, advertisements, or other formal job postings that could reach applicants within or outside Cleveland for potential employment in the city. These posted pay ranges must be a reasonable, good-faith estimate of what the employer expects to pay for that specific position when filled.

Pay Transparency Requirements

Employers may not request, require, or rely on an applicant’s pay history or allow it to affect their screening or hiring decisions in any way. If an employer inadvertently receives pay information, they must not rely on it when deciding whether to offer the position or when determining the rate of pay for the applicant.

Exceptions to the Law

This law will not apply in the following circumstances:

  1. When an employee is transferred or promoted internally;
  2. When an applicant voluntarily discloses their pay history during the application process, without being asked;
  3. When pay history is discovered during a background check (note, employers still may not rely on this information during the screening or hiring process);
  4. When a former employee is rehired and the employer already has the applicant’s pay history on file; or
  5. When another law specifically authorizes the employer to rely on the applicant’s pay history.

Action Steps for Employers

Employers are guided to consider the following actions to help comply with the Ordinance. First, they should review and update all current job notifications, advertisements, and other formal job postings to include a good-faith estimate of a position’s pay range. Next, employers should train hiring managers and recruiters to ensure they do not ask about or rely on applicant’s pay history during the hiring process. Finally, employers should remove all salary history questions from job applications, interviewing materials, and any pre-screening tools to maintain compliance with the ordinance and promote fair hiring practices.

Pay Transparency Movement

The Cleveland pay transparency law follows a growing trend across Ohio aimed at promoting fair and equitable hiring practices. Several other cities have already enacted similar measures, including Cincinnati in March 2020 (Ordinance No. 83), Toledo in June 2020 (Pay Equity Act), and Columbus in March 2024 (Ordinance 0709-2023). While Cleveland has not yet gone as far as other jurisdictions, it may eventually take a similar approach to Colorado, which has become a national leader in pay transparency. In 2024, the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment adopted the Interpretive Notice & Formal Opinion (“INFO”) #9A, which requires any employer with at least one employee within the state to include, in good faith, a reasonable pay range in every job posting. Cleveland’s new law could represent an early step towards adopting a similar comprehensive transparency standard in the future.

Conclusion

As it stands, Cleveland employers, with 15 or more employees, should begin implementing these changes by updating their hiring practices to ensure full compliance with Ordinance No. 104-2025. Consulting with legal counsel before making policy changes can help mitigate risks and ensure compliance with applicable laws.

For further guidance on how pay transparency requirements may impact your employment policies, please contact our team today. Bryan Meek is a Partner at Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC and is the Co-chair of its Labor & Employment Division. Bryan may be contacted at 330-253-5586 or via email at bmeek@bmdllc.com.


Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content, but it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.

Tariffs, Market Downturn, and Employment Considerations for Employers

As tariffs continue to impact various industries, employers must prepare for the ripple effects these economic pressures can have on workforce management. The economic impact can dramatically impact companies’ bottom lines, and companies look to improve finances and save for the future and many will choose to reduce employee count/wages.

Corporate Transparency Act Overhauled: U.S. Entities No Longer Required to Report

The Department of Treasury has issued an interim final rule significantly altering the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As of March 21, 2025, all U.S.-created entities and their beneficial owners are exempt from reporting requirements. Only non-U.S. entities registered to do business in the U.S. must still report, but they are not required to disclose U.S. citizen owners. Business owners should stay informed on these changes and consult legal counsel for compliance guidance.

ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.