Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Cleveland Joins the Pay Transparency Movement: What Employers Need to Know

Client Alert

Beginning October 27, 2025, all Cleveland employers with 15 or more employees will be prohibited from asking applicants about their pay history and will be required to include reasonable pay ranges in all job postings where the position will be performed, solicited, considered, or processed in Cleveland. The ordinance is intended to help close the gender wage gap and promote greater pay equity across the city.

Overview of the New Cleveland Law

On April 28, 2025, the Cleveland City Council passed Ordinance No. 104-2025, which requires employers to include pay ranges in job notifications, advertisements, or other formal job postings that could reach applicants within or outside Cleveland for potential employment in the city. These posted pay ranges must be a reasonable, good-faith estimate of what the employer expects to pay for that specific position when filled.

Pay Transparency Requirements

Employers may not request, require, or rely on an applicant’s pay history or allow it to affect their screening or hiring decisions in any way. If an employer inadvertently receives pay information, they must not rely on it when deciding whether to offer the position or when determining the rate of pay for the applicant.

Exceptions to the Law

This law will not apply in the following circumstances:

  1. When an employee is transferred or promoted internally;
  2. When an applicant voluntarily discloses their pay history during the application process, without being asked;
  3. When pay history is discovered during a background check (note, employers still may not rely on this information during the screening or hiring process);
  4. When a former employee is rehired and the employer already has the applicant’s pay history on file; or
  5. When another law specifically authorizes the employer to rely on the applicant’s pay history.

Action Steps for Employers

Employers are guided to consider the following actions to help comply with the Ordinance. First, they should review and update all current job notifications, advertisements, and other formal job postings to include a good-faith estimate of a position’s pay range. Next, employers should train hiring managers and recruiters to ensure they do not ask about or rely on applicant’s pay history during the hiring process. Finally, employers should remove all salary history questions from job applications, interviewing materials, and any pre-screening tools to maintain compliance with the ordinance and promote fair hiring practices.

Pay Transparency Movement

The Cleveland pay transparency law follows a growing trend across Ohio aimed at promoting fair and equitable hiring practices. Several other cities have already enacted similar measures, including Cincinnati in March 2020 (Ordinance No. 83), Toledo in June 2020 (Pay Equity Act), and Columbus in March 2024 (Ordinance 0709-2023). While Cleveland has not yet gone as far as other jurisdictions, it may eventually take a similar approach to Colorado, which has become a national leader in pay transparency. In 2024, the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment adopted the Interpretive Notice & Formal Opinion (“INFO”) #9A, which requires any employer with at least one employee within the state to include, in good faith, a reasonable pay range in every job posting. Cleveland’s new law could represent an early step towards adopting a similar comprehensive transparency standard in the future.

Conclusion

As it stands, Cleveland employers, with 15 or more employees, should begin implementing these changes by updating their hiring practices to ensure full compliance with Ordinance No. 104-2025. Consulting with legal counsel before making policy changes can help mitigate risks and ensure compliance with applicable laws.

For further guidance on how pay transparency requirements may impact your employment policies, please contact our team today. Bryan Meek is a Partner at Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC and is the Co-chair of its Labor & Employment Division. Bryan may be contacted at 330-253-5586 or via email at bmeek@bmdllc.com.


January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.

Immigration Orders and Their Economic Impact on Small Business: Insights from Attorney and Former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff

President Trump's recent executive orders, targeting immigration policies, could significantly impact small businesses in Ohio, particularly those owned by undocumented immigrants. With stricter visa vetting, halted refugee admissions, and potential deportations, these businesses face uncertainty, workforce disruption, and closures. Ohio's immigrant-owned businesses, especially in food services and transportation, contribute billions to the state economy, and any disruption could result in economic ripple effects.

Corporate Transparency Act Ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), lifting an injunction previously imposed by the Fifth Circuit. However, a separate nationwide injunction remains in effect, meaning businesses are still not required to comply with the CTA’s reporting requirements. FinCEN continues to accept voluntary reporting while enforcement remains paused.