Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

CMS’s Rural Health Funding Announcement

Client Alert

Last month, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (“Notice”) for the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation (“RHT”) Program. The RHT Program was created by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to partially offset the impact of the estimated $137 billion reduction in federal Medicaid spending in rural areas alone, also resulting from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The five-year Program seeks to support rural communities by improving healthcare access, quality, and health outcomes.

CMS’s Notice sets forth the criteria that it will use to determine how RHT funds will be allocated to states. All 50 states are eligible to apply for funding, regardless of the size of their rural population or the needs of their rural hospitals. [1] To receive funds, states must submit their applications by Wednesday, November 5, 2025. A merit review panel will review all applications, and CMS will issue award decisions by December 31, 2025.

Half of the fund ($25 billion) will be distributed equally across states with approved applications, and the remaining $25 billion will be distributed among approved states based on 23 factors. These factors include data-driven measures of a state’s rural health population, rural health facilities, and other state characteristics, such as state-proposed initiatives and state efforts to implement Make America Healthy Again policies. The Notice details the point scoring methodology for each factor and provides examples of initiatives that align with the Program’s goals. As part of the application, states must describe how they will use RHT funds to support their own initiatives. States can consider collaborating with stakeholders to bolster their applications.

States may use RHT funds in a variety of ways. For example, these funds may be used to promote evidence-based, measurable interventions to improve prevention and chronic disease management, recruit and retain clinical workforce talent to rural areas, and support access to opioid use disorder treatment services. The Notice provides a list of impermissible uses of funds, such as to fund new construction or initiatives that fund gender-affirming care.

Participating states must abide by the terms and conditions of their awards, such as satisfying annual reporting requirements. CMS reserves the right to decrease funding or terminate a state’s award if it fails to meet its requirements. States will be assessed on an annual basis throughout the duration of the Program, primarily as it pertains to progress made with their proposed initiatives and policy changes.

While there are uncertainties as to who will benefit the most from RHT funds, CMS has explained “the intent of this funding is not to be used for perpetual operating expenses, but rather for investments that can be made within the duration of the program that will have sustainable impact beyond the end of the program.”

To learn more about the RHT Program and how state applications will be reviewed, please contact Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.


[1] By law, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories are ineligible for funding.


Community Behavioral Health Providers - Supervisor Pricing Changes Begin July 1 [Corrected Date]

Effective June 16, community behavioral health providers wishing to receive reimbursement at the supervisor rate must add the HP or HT Modifier to fee-for-service (FFS) claims. Find out about the new guidelines.

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.

House Republicans Propose Cuts to Medicaid to Finance Savings

House Republicans have introduced legislative language that proposes substantial cuts to the Medicaid entitlement program, aiming to achieve significant budget savings through policy changes. The proposed measures include stricter eligibility verification, work requirements for certain adults, and federal funding cuts to states providing coverage to undocumented residents. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the proposed healthcare provisions would reduce spending by $715 billion and could result in 8.6 million fewer people having health insurance by 2034.