Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

DEA and HHS Issue its Third Extension of Telemedicine Flexibilities through 2025

Client Alert

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) together with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has extended telemedicine flexibilities for the prescribing of controlled medication through December 31, 2025.

Prior to telemedicine flexibilities, the Ryan Haight Act required that a prescribing provider could only prescribe controlled medications to patients whom they had evaluated in-person. The DEA made temporary exceptions to this Act in 2020 in response to COVID-19, granting prescribing providers the authority to prescribe Schedule II-V controlled medications from a telemedicine evaluation alone. However, these prescriptions still had to comply with the requirements outlined in the DEA guidance documents, DEA regulations, and applicable Federal and State laws.

The DEA received more than 38,000 comments in response to its set of proposed telemedicine rules in March 2023 and held two days of listening sessions as a result. This feedback prompted the DEA and HHS to ultimately extend the current telemedicine flexibilities through the end of 2024. While the two agencies continue working to issue a final set of telemedicine regulations, they decided to extend telemedicine flexibilities for a third time through December 31, 2025.

This extension benefits both patients and providers by ensuring expanded patient access to these prescriptions and allowing sufficient time for providers to become compliant with any new standards that may eventually appear in the final set of regulations.

If you have questions about the DEA and HHS’s decision to issue a third extension of telemedicine flexibilities, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.


Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.