Client Alerts, News Articles & Blog Posts

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Families First Coronavirus Act (“FFCRA”) Under Attack

In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, the Families First Coronavirus Act (“FFCRA” or “the Act”) went into effect on April 1, 2020 followed closely behind by the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule on the Act which, collectively, describe the obligations of employers as well as the rights of employees under the FFCRA’s paid sick time and expanded family medical leave provisions.

In response to a legal challenge to the FFCRA by the State of New York, on August 3, 2020, a judge out of the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”) issued a decision vacating certain provisions of the DOL’s regulations. The SDNY Court found the following:

  • The FFCRA’s definition of “health care provider” is “overly broad” as it encompasses employees “whose [workplace] role bears no nexus whatsoever to the provision of healthcare services;”
  • An employer’s ability to provide an employee work to complete may no longer be considered relevant in assessing eligibility for FFCRA leave;
  • Under certain circumstances, an employee may take intermittent FFCRA leave without first obtaining employer approval;
  • The FFCRA’s notice requirement — obligating an employee to submit notice of intent to take leave prior to actually taking it — is not practicable and therefore, in some instances, may be waived, allowing employees to submit notice after their leave begins.

While attacks on the legality of the FFCRA have been levied since its passage by Congress, this is the first official decision handed down by the judiciary. With that said, the SDNY decision is limited in scope as it applies only to that jurisdiction — leaving open the issue of how other courts, as well as the Department of Labor, will respond to the FFCRA challenges.

As questions, concerns and legal guidance continue to evolve with the changing times, it is essential for employers to stay informed. If you need assistance with any issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, please contract Jeffrey C. Miller (216.658.2323 | jcmiller@bmdllc.com) or Bryan Meek (330.253.5586 | bmeek@bmdllc.com), or any member of the Labor and Employment Team of Brennan, Manna & Diamond LLC.

El Contrato Escrito: La Herramienta Predilecta

No existe mejor herramienta a una disputa contractual que un documento firmado por las partes en el cual se expongan las obligaciones y acuerdos entre éstas.

New State Budget Institutes Licensure Requirement for Ohio’s Hospitals

On July 1, 2021, Governor Mike DeWine signed Ohio’s final budget codified at Ohio Revised Code 3722.01 et seq., which includes a new licensing requirement for Ohio’s hospitals. For years, Ohio was the only state in the country that did not license its hospitals. This approach will now be replaced with new, detailed requirements that will require careful review and compliance. Here are some of the highlights concerning these new changes:

Healthcare Provisions in the Ohio FY 22-23 Budget

Governor Mike DeWine signed Ohio’s Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget bill (HB 110) into law on July 1, 2021. At almost 1,000 pages and 74.1 billion dollars, the budget lays out the State’s spending for the next two years. Below are a few highlighted provisions from the budget that will be important for the healthcare industry in Ohio

Interim Final Rule for Surprise Billing

In an effort to implement the new bipartisan No Surprises Act, on July 1, 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), along with the Departments of Labor and Treasury, issued an interim final rule to safeguard patients against unforeseen medical bills arising from out-of-network care.

President Biden Seeks to Limit Non-Compete Agreements

Today, President Biden announced he would issue an Executive Order that calls on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to adopt rules to curtail worker non-compete agreements. Interestingly, a week ago, the FTC approved changes to its Rules of Practice to modernize and expedite the way it issues Trade Regulation Rules. If you have followed our alerts, we predicted the elimination of non-competes would probably happen. In 2016, then-Vice President Biden was a vocal opponent against non-compete agreements. He led the Obama administration’s initiative seeking to limit or eliminate non-compete agreements. In his presidential campaign, Biden promised to “work with Congress to eliminate all non-compete agreements, except the very few that are absolutely necessary to protect a narrowly defined category of trade secrets . . ..”