Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Is Your Bonus System Creating Wage and Hour Violations? A Hidden Impact of the Labor Shortages

Client Alert

As employers struggle with attracting and retaining talent, many have turned to incentives such as Signing Bonuses and Retention Bonuses. In doing so, employers may be inadvertently exposing themselves to overtime law violations. 

Employers with non-exempt employees know that the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires an overtime premium to non-exempt employees for work in excess of 40 hours per week. However, all too often, employers miscalculate the “regular rate” of pay, which is used for calculating the “overtime rate.” The miscalculation is becoming more prevalent in today’s market when employers fail to include supplemental compensation, such as certain Signing Bonuses and Retention Bonuses into the regular rate of pay.

An example: A non-exempt employee is hired at a rate of $20 per hour, and also receives a retention bonus of $1,200 after working for 12 weeks. In her 11th week of work, employee works 50 hours. In her 14th week of work, employee works 50 hours. What is her paycheck in week 11?  What is her paycheck in week 14?

  • Week 14 is the easy answer. Her regular rate of pay is $20/hour. She will receive 50 hours at regular rate = $1,000. She will also receive 10 hours at overtime premium of $10.00/hour ($20 x 0.5) = $100. Her paycheck for 50 hours of work in week 14 will be $1,100.00.
  • Week 11 is the complicated answer. The $1,200 bonus will be attributed evenly across her first 12 weeks for $100 per week. In week 11, she worked 50 hours, which increased her regular rate of pay by $2.00 ($100/50 hours). Her overtime rate was therefore increased by $1.00 ($2.00 x 0.5), and with 10 OT hours, her paycheck increased by $10.00 above the weeks when the bonus was inapplicable.  Her paycheck for 50 hours of work in week 11 will be $1,110.00.        

A quick default rule on the FLSA and “regular rate” of pay -

The “regular rate” of pay for non-exempt employees includes ALL compensation earned during a workweek.

The FLSA does permit certain defined exclusions from the total compensation, such as discretionary bonuses (i.e., employee of the month, severance, and referral bonuses); however, FLSA guidance provides that few bonuses are discretionary. A discretionary bonus must be unanticipated, purely discretionary, and/or independent from an individual’s specific work performance.  

All non-discretionary bonuses must be included in the total compensation. A non-discretionary bonus is any predictable, promised, or pending payment made because an employee meets a certain tenure, quality of work, quantity of production, or efficiency of operations. 

A pure signing bonus is discretionary. However, a signing bonus with a claw-back provision only vests once an employee meets a certain tenure; therefore, it becomes non-discretionary. 

Therefore, if we change the example above to: 

A non-exempt employee is hired at a rate of $20 per hour, and also receives a signing bonus of $1,200. Her offer letter provides that the employer will claw-back the signing bonus (or deduct it from her final paycheck) if she leaves before working for twelve (12) full weeks.    

It will result in the same calculation of overtime rate. The Signing Bonus did not vest until she worked 12 full weeks. Since it was tied to her tenure, it became non-discretionary.

What does this mean for employers? Employers who are utilizing certain Signing Bonuses and Retention Bonuses to attract and retain non-exempt employees must evaluate whether and how to attribute the bonus to workweeks covered by the bonus period. If the non-exempt employee earned overtime in a workweek, then the employer must calculate the regular rate, with the inclusion of the bonus, in order to determine the appropriate overtime rate.

Won’t my payroll system automatically adjust the overtime rate? Not necessarily. One of the purposes for this post is to make employers aware of the issue, which is occurring more and more frequently. It seems that many of the auto-payroll systems are not set up to address the reconciliation and/or employers are not inputting the correct data.

Can employers circumvent the issue? Maybe. There are plenty of strategies to consider, including:

  • Making Signing Bonuses earned and vested at the time of signing, and eliminating claw-backs.
  • Providing Retention Bonuses on a weekly basis, which avoids the task of having to reconcile overtime rate over an extended period of time. Any OT rate can be adjusted in that pay period.
  • Tying Retention Bonuses tied to a specific week of work, rather than a tenure of employment; i.e., a 50th week of work bonus of $1,000.00.

What are the risks? Failure to calculate overtime rates of non-exempt employees at the proper rates of pay is a beacon to attract plaintiffs’ attorneys. The FLSA provides for recovery of unpaid wages and liquidated damages. State laws can allow recovery of triple damages. With today’s labor shortages and high-turnover, inadvertent calculation errors can quickly add up. While the total amount of unpaid wages are usually limited, the liquidated damages, costs, and attorney fees are always exponentially higher.   

For employers offering non-discretionary bonuses to non-exempt employees, make sure you are performing accurate calculations of rates of pay and overtime rates. For employers considering implementation of a bonus system, make sure that the system is set up properly to avoid creating liabilities. For additional information, mathematic calculations, or guidance on Wage and Hour matters, please contact Labor + Employment Partner Jeffrey C. Miller, jcmiller@bmdllc.com, or any member of the BMD L+E Team.


Update on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Related Countries

USCIS has temporarily extended Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for certain Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries from Haiti and several other countries following recent court action. Employers and TPS recipients should review EAD expiration dates, monitor ongoing developments, and ensure compliance with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements.

HHS Accessibility Requirements for Medical Diagnostic Equipment: What Health Care Providers Need to Know

Health care providers that receive federal financial assistance are now subject to updated HHS accessibility requirements for medical diagnostic equipment under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. With the July 8, 2026, compliance deadline in effect, covered providers should ensure they have the required accessible equipment, train staff, and review operational practices to reduce compliance risk and provide accessible care for patients with disabilities.

Florida Super Lawyers® Recognizes Brennan Manna Diamond Attorneys to the 2026 Lists

BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND is proud to announce that three of our attorneys have been designated to the 2026 Florida Super Lawyers® and Florida Rising Stars® lists. Super Lawyers is based on multiple categories of independent research and peer evaluation to identify outstanding lawyers.

Supreme Court Clears Path for TPS Terminations: What Employers Need to Know

The U.S. Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 decision in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot removed legal obstacles that had delayed the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria. The ruling also reinforces the administration's authority to terminate other TPS designations currently under review. Employers should immediately identify workers whose employment authorization is tied to affected TPS programs, review Form I-9 records, and prepare for forthcoming USCIS guidance before taking any employment action.

The Risks of Outsourcing Medical Billing and the Importance of State-Law Compliance

Offshoring medical billing and other administrative functions can reduce costs, but it also raises significant compliance, operational, and contractual risks. Although HIPAA does not explicitly prohibit protected health information from being accessed or stored outside the United States, healthcare providers and their vendors remain responsible for safeguarding patient information and complying with state-specific restrictions that may limit or prohibit offshore subcontracting.