Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Is Your Bonus System Creating Wage and Hour Violations? A Hidden Impact of the Labor Shortages

Client Alert

As employers struggle with attracting and retaining talent, many have turned to incentives such as Signing Bonuses and Retention Bonuses. In doing so, employers may be inadvertently exposing themselves to overtime law violations. 

Employers with non-exempt employees know that the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires an overtime premium to non-exempt employees for work in excess of 40 hours per week. However, all too often, employers miscalculate the “regular rate” of pay, which is used for calculating the “overtime rate.” The miscalculation is becoming more prevalent in today’s market when employers fail to include supplemental compensation, such as certain Signing Bonuses and Retention Bonuses into the regular rate of pay.

An example: A non-exempt employee is hired at a rate of $20 per hour, and also receives a retention bonus of $1,200 after working for 12 weeks. In her 11th week of work, employee works 50 hours. In her 14th week of work, employee works 50 hours. What is her paycheck in week 11?  What is her paycheck in week 14?

  • Week 14 is the easy answer. Her regular rate of pay is $20/hour. She will receive 50 hours at regular rate = $1,000. She will also receive 10 hours at overtime premium of $10.00/hour ($20 x 0.5) = $100. Her paycheck for 50 hours of work in week 14 will be $1,100.00.
  • Week 11 is the complicated answer. The $1,200 bonus will be attributed evenly across her first 12 weeks for $100 per week. In week 11, she worked 50 hours, which increased her regular rate of pay by $2.00 ($100/50 hours). Her overtime rate was therefore increased by $1.00 ($2.00 x 0.5), and with 10 OT hours, her paycheck increased by $10.00 above the weeks when the bonus was inapplicable.  Her paycheck for 50 hours of work in week 11 will be $1,110.00.        

A quick default rule on the FLSA and “regular rate” of pay -

The “regular rate” of pay for non-exempt employees includes ALL compensation earned during a workweek.

The FLSA does permit certain defined exclusions from the total compensation, such as discretionary bonuses (i.e., employee of the month, severance, and referral bonuses); however, FLSA guidance provides that few bonuses are discretionary. A discretionary bonus must be unanticipated, purely discretionary, and/or independent from an individual’s specific work performance.  

All non-discretionary bonuses must be included in the total compensation. A non-discretionary bonus is any predictable, promised, or pending payment made because an employee meets a certain tenure, quality of work, quantity of production, or efficiency of operations. 

A pure signing bonus is discretionary. However, a signing bonus with a claw-back provision only vests once an employee meets a certain tenure; therefore, it becomes non-discretionary. 

Therefore, if we change the example above to: 

A non-exempt employee is hired at a rate of $20 per hour, and also receives a signing bonus of $1,200. Her offer letter provides that the employer will claw-back the signing bonus (or deduct it from her final paycheck) if she leaves before working for twelve (12) full weeks.    

It will result in the same calculation of overtime rate. The Signing Bonus did not vest until she worked 12 full weeks. Since it was tied to her tenure, it became non-discretionary.

What does this mean for employers? Employers who are utilizing certain Signing Bonuses and Retention Bonuses to attract and retain non-exempt employees must evaluate whether and how to attribute the bonus to workweeks covered by the bonus period. If the non-exempt employee earned overtime in a workweek, then the employer must calculate the regular rate, with the inclusion of the bonus, in order to determine the appropriate overtime rate.

Won’t my payroll system automatically adjust the overtime rate? Not necessarily. One of the purposes for this post is to make employers aware of the issue, which is occurring more and more frequently. It seems that many of the auto-payroll systems are not set up to address the reconciliation and/or employers are not inputting the correct data.

Can employers circumvent the issue? Maybe. There are plenty of strategies to consider, including:

  • Making Signing Bonuses earned and vested at the time of signing, and eliminating claw-backs.
  • Providing Retention Bonuses on a weekly basis, which avoids the task of having to reconcile overtime rate over an extended period of time. Any OT rate can be adjusted in that pay period.
  • Tying Retention Bonuses tied to a specific week of work, rather than a tenure of employment; i.e., a 50th week of work bonus of $1,000.00.

What are the risks? Failure to calculate overtime rates of non-exempt employees at the proper rates of pay is a beacon to attract plaintiffs’ attorneys. The FLSA provides for recovery of unpaid wages and liquidated damages. State laws can allow recovery of triple damages. With today’s labor shortages and high-turnover, inadvertent calculation errors can quickly add up. While the total amount of unpaid wages are usually limited, the liquidated damages, costs, and attorney fees are always exponentially higher.   

For employers offering non-discretionary bonuses to non-exempt employees, make sure you are performing accurate calculations of rates of pay and overtime rates. For employers considering implementation of a bonus system, make sure that the system is set up properly to avoid creating liabilities. For additional information, mathematic calculations, or guidance on Wage and Hour matters, please contact Labor + Employment Partner Jeffrey C. Miller, jcmiller@bmdllc.com, or any member of the BMD L+E Team.


New Ohio Recovery Housing Rules Take Effect January 1, 2025

Ohio’s new recovery housing rules, effective January 1, 2025, require certified community behavioral health providers to refer clients only to accredited recovery housing residences listed on the statewide registry.

SCOTUS to Weigh In on Medicaid Beneficiaries’ Right to Choose their Provider

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments this spring on whether Medicaid beneficiaries have an enforceable right to choose their healthcare providers without state interference, as outlined in Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act. This case stems from a South Carolina petition challenging a Fourth Circuit ruling that blocked the state from terminating Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid provider agreement.

I Went to Bed and the Rules Changed: the Corporate Transparency Act is Back on Hold

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ordered on December 26, 2024 that in an effort to “preserve the constitutional status quo” while it considered the Federal Government’s appeal, it vacated the prior order for a stay of the nationwide injunction pending appeal entered on December 23, 2024, and reinstated the preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the CTA and its corresponding Reporting Rule.

Telemedicine Flexibilities Extended to March 31, 2025

The American Relief Act of 2025 extends key telehealth flexibilities through March 31, 2025, originally enacted during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE). These flexibilities remove geographic and originating site restrictions for Medicare patients, expand the list of qualified practitioners, and allow for audio-only services and telehealth mental health care without in-person requirements. Although this extension is temporary, it provides continued access to essential healthcare services. Congress will need to pass permanent legislation to solidify these changes beyond March 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Is Back in Effect: Are You Ready?

On December 23, 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the filing requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), overturning a prior injunction. Businesses now have updated deadlines to file initial beneficial ownership information reports with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), based on their registration date. Affected companies must comply with these new deadlines, which vary depending on when the company was created or registered.