Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Laboratory Medical Tests: the FDA’s Newest Regulatory Objective

Client Alert

On September 29, 2023, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule aimed at strengthening federal regulation of laboratory medical tests. Though the laboratory medical test industry has become a multibillion-dollar industry in America, the industry has never come within the FDA’s regulatory breadth. FDA Commissioner Robert Califf said the proposed rule targets laboratory medical tests that produce inaccurate results, to the risk of patient safety.

Why is the proposed rule necessary?

The risk to patients from laboratory tests has increased in recent years. In decades past, most lab-based tests were “lower risk, small volume” products used for local patients, according to the FDA. As the laboratory test market has grown exponentially, with laboratory companies processing thousands of blood and urine tests per week, there has been little quality control over these tests.

FDA officials have long highlighted the dangers of inaccurate laboratory tests for consumers. Specifically, inaccurate tests can lead to patients receiving an incorrect diagnosis, skipping necessary treatments, or receiving unnecessary medication or surgery. As more tests are mass-produced and mass-marketed, more consumers are facing unreliable and inaccurate tests, prompting the FDA to act.

However, problems with the mass-produced diagnostic test market are not uncommon. During the Coronavirus pandemic, U.S. laboratories quickly produced and sold to American consumers batches of COVID-19 tests without federal oversight. More recently, pregnancy tests produced by laboratories have been advertised to consumers with the promise that they can screen for genetic mutations that can lead to Down’s syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and other disorders. Other laboratory tests advertised directly to consumers have claimed to measure the risk of developing ailments like Alzheimer’s and autism. In response, numerous studies and reports identified that the tests misstated or exaggerated the risks of those conditions to vulnerable consumers.

This proposed rule is not the first time the FDA has attempted to regulate the laboratory industry. Over ten years ago, the FDA drafted guidelines for the industry, but they were never finalized. Last year, lawmakers in Congress with FDA support drafted a bill granting the FDA explicit authority to regulate high-risk tests, but the measure failed to pass in either chamber amidst opposition by industry lobbyists.

What does the proposed rule accomplish?

The FDA’s proposed rule would formally bring under FDA oversight thousands of tests performed in large laboratories. The laboratory tests specifically targeted by the FDA are developed by high-volume laboratories, including academic medical centers and large diagnostic companies. The tests can diagnose diseases like cancer, high cholesterol, and sexually transmitted infections.

Currently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency responsible for the Medicaid and Medicare programs, has oversight over testing laboratories. Further, inspectors evaluate the general health and safety conditions and procedures at labs, but there is no quality control or marketing standards for individual tests. Under the proposed rule, the FDA would gradually come to regulate laboratory tests over a five-year period, replacing CMS. At the end of the five years, most new tests would be subject to FDA standards and review before they could be sold to consumers.

While the laboratory industry argues that FDA regulation stifles innovation and new developments, especially during health crises, the FDA is considering exempting from review some tests already sold on the market. The FDA is now accepting comments on its proposed rule for sixty days before drafting a final rule.

If you have questions about the FDA’s proposed rule or laboratory regulations, please contact BMD Vice President and Healthcare Attorney Amanda Waesch.


HHS Accessibility Requirements for Medical Diagnostic Equipment: What Health Care Providers Need to Know

Health care providers that receive federal financial assistance are now subject to updated HHS accessibility requirements for medical diagnostic equipment under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. With the July 8, 2026, compliance deadline in effect, covered providers should ensure they have the required accessible equipment, train staff, and review operational practices to reduce compliance risk and provide accessible care for patients with disabilities.

Florida Super Lawyers® Recognizes Brennan Manna Diamond Attorneys to the 2026 Lists

BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND is proud to announce that three of our attorneys have been designated to the 2026 Florida Super Lawyers® and Florida Rising Stars® lists. Super Lawyers is based on multiple categories of independent research and peer evaluation to identify outstanding lawyers.

Supreme Court Clears Path for TPS Terminations: What Employers Need to Know

The U.S. Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 decision in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot removed legal obstacles that had delayed the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria. The ruling also reinforces the administration's authority to terminate other TPS designations currently under review. Employers should immediately identify workers whose employment authorization is tied to affected TPS programs, review Form I-9 records, and prepare for forthcoming USCIS guidance before taking any employment action.

The Risks of Outsourcing Medical Billing and the Importance of State-Law Compliance

Offshoring medical billing and other administrative functions can reduce costs, but it also raises significant compliance, operational, and contractual risks. Although HIPAA does not explicitly prohibit protected health information from being accessed or stored outside the United States, healthcare providers and their vendors remain responsible for safeguarding patient information and complying with state-specific restrictions that may limit or prohibit offshore subcontracting.

Risks of Using AI-Generated, Implied Celebrity Endorsements in Advertising

Businesses using AI-generated celebrity images, videos, or voice simulations in advertising may face significant legal risks if the content falsely implies an endorsement, affiliation, or sponsorship. This article discusses potential exposure under false advertising, right of publicity, consumer protection, and professional conduct laws, and explains why disclaimers may not be enough to avoid liability.