Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

LGBTQIA+ Patients and Discrimination in Healthcare

Client Alert

In early April, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a study outlining the challenges that LGBT adults face in the United States related to healthcare.[1] According to the study, LGBT patients are “twice as likely as non-LGBT adults to report negative experiences while receiving health care in the last three years, including being treated unfairly or with disrespect (33% v. 15%) or having at least one of several other negative experiences with a provider (61% v. 31%), including a provider assuming something about them without asking, suggesting they were personally to blame for a health problem, ignoring a direct request or question, or refusing to prescribe needed pain medication.”[2]

Additionally, the study showed that LGBT patients were more likely to have negative health care experiences in the past three years that caused their health to get worse and were less likely to seek care.[3] Lower income patients, as well as those who are younger, or are women, reportedly experience higher rates of discrimination and unfair treatment than older, male LGBT patients.

Avoiding Discrimination
Providers can take steps to make healthcare more inclusive for the LGBTQIA+ community, which includes lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals.

First, implementing an intake protocol to quickly identify LGBTQIA+ individuals can promote patient-centered care and foster an inclusive environment for all patients. For example, providers can include prompts such as gender history, sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex assigned at birth. Further, the method for collecting the information should be considered. Typically, utilizing a registration desk is least preferred by patients, however, other ideas include capturing information on paper or laminated forms with dry erase markers, electronic check-ins from the patient’s home, self-check-ins at the healthcare facility, or going over information in a private setting with a medical assistant, nurse, or other provider.

Additionally, gender and LGBTQIA+ status is considered protected health information (PHI) under HIPAA. Therefore, intake forms should include confidentiality and privacy language, and medical staff should be equipped to discuss HIPAA protections with patients to help them understand the security of their sensitive information.

Providers should also consider implementing training to identify and treat the unique health needs of LGBTQIA+ patients. Trainings can focus on improving patient-provider communication, enhancing patient-centered, compassionate care, and creating a safer and more inclusive environment.

The Joint Commission’s Field Guide recommends the following practices:

  1. Integrate unique LGBTQ+ patient needs into new policies or modify existing policies
  2. Review nondiscrimination and visitation policies, revise the definition of family
  3. Demonstrate ongoing commitment to inclusivity for LGBQT+ patients and families
  4. Develop a mechanism for reporting discrimination or disrespectful treatment[4]

Lastly, providers should ensure they are complying with local, state, and federal laws related to discrimination. Relevant federal laws to be aware of include the Public Health Services Act, which among other prohibitions, prohibits discrimination on the basis of age, race, color, national origin, disability, religion, or sex in programs, services, and activities funded by Preventative Health and Health Services Block Grants;[5] Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination against individuals on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age and disability in covered health programs or activities; and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires Medicare-participating hospitals with emergency departments to provide medical screening examinations to any individual who comes to the emergency department and requests examination, regardless of ability to pay or insured status.[6]

If you have any questions regarding caring for LGBTQIA+ patients and avoiding discrimination, please don’t hesitate to contact BMD Health Law Group Member Jeana M. Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001, or BMD Attorney Rachel Stermer at rcstermer@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2019.  

[1] Kaiser Family Foundation, “LGBT Adults’ Experiences with Discrimination and Health Care Disparities: Findings from the KFF Survey of Racism, Discrimination, and Health” (Apr. 2, 2024) https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/poll-finding/lgbt-adults-experiences-with-discrimination-and-health-care-disparities-findings-from-the-kff-survey-of-racism-discrimination-and-health/

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] The Joint Commission, “Meeting the Needs of the LGBTQ+ Community – Then and Now” (June 25, 2023) https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/news-and-multimedia/blogs/advancing-health-care-equity/2022/06/meeting-the-needs-of-the-lgbtq-community/#:~:text=The%20Joint%20Commission's%20Field%20Guide,policies%20or%20modify%20existing%20policies

[5] 42 USC § 300w-7.

[6] 42 USC § 1395dd.


Investment Training for the Second and Third Generations

Consider this scenario. Mom and Dad started the business from the ground up. Over the decades it has expanded into a money-making machine. They are able to sell the business and it results in a multimillion-dollar payday for their labors. The excess money has allowed Mom and Dad to invest with various financial advising firms, several fund management groups, and directly with new startups and joint ventures. Their experience has made them savvy investors, with a detailed understanding of how much to invest, when, and where. They cannot justify formation of a full family office with dedicated investors to manage the funds, but Mom and Dad have set up a trust fund for the children to allow these investments to continue to grow over the years. Eventually, Mom and Dad pass. Their children enjoy the fruits of their labors, and, by the time the grandchildren are adults, Mom and Dad's savvy investments are gone.

Provider Relief Funds – Continued Confusion Regarding Reporting Requirements and Lost Revenues

In Fall 2020, HHS issued multiple rounds of guidance and FAQs regarding the reporting requirements for the Provider Relief Funds, the most recently published notice being November 2, 2020 and December 11, 2020. Specifically, the reporting portal for the use of the funds in 2020 was scheduled to open on January 15, 2021. Although there was much speculation as to whether this would occur. And, as of the date of this article, the portal was not opened.

Ohio S.B. 310 Loosens Practice Barrier for Advanced Practice Providers

S.B. 310, signed by Ohio Governor DeWine and effective from December 29, 2020 until May 1, 2021, provides flexibility regarding the regulatorily mandated supervision and collaboration agreements for physician assistants, certified nurse-midwives, clinical nurse specialists and certified nurse practitioners working in a hospital or other health care facility. Originally drafted as a bill to distribute federal COVID funding to local subdivisions, the healthcare related provisions were added to help relieve some of the stresses hospitals and other healthcare facilities are facing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

HHS Issues Opinion Regarding Illegal Attempts by Drug Manufacturers to Deny 340B Discounts under Contract Pharmacy Arrangements

The federal 340B discount drug program is a safety net for many federally qualified health centers, disproportionate share hospitals, and other covered entities. This program allows these providers to obtain discount pricing on drugs which in turn allows the providers to better serve their patient populations and provide their patients with access to vital health care services. Over the years, the 340B program has undergone intense scrutiny, particularly by drug manufacturers who are required by federal law to provide the discounted pricing.

S.B. 263 Protects 340B Covered Entities from Predatory Practices in Ohio

Just before the end of calendar year 2020 and at the end of its two-year legislative session, the Ohio General Assembly passed Senate Bill 263, which prohibits insurance companies and pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”) from imposing on 340B Covered Entities discriminatory pricing and other contract terms. This is a win for safety net providers and the people they serve, as 340B savings are crucial to their ability to provide high quality, affordable programs and services to patients.