Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

LGBTQIA+ Patients and Discrimination in Healthcare

Client Alert
June 6, 2024

In early April, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a study outlining the challenges that LGBT adults face in the United States related to healthcare.[1] According to the study, LGBT patients are “twice as likely as non-LGBT adults to report negative experiences while receiving health care in the last three years, including being treated unfairly or with disrespect (33% v. 15%) or having at least one of several other negative experiences with a provider (61% v. 31%), including a provider assuming something about them without asking, suggesting they were personally to blame for a health problem, ignoring a direct request or question, or refusing to prescribe needed pain medication.”[2]

Additionally, the study showed that LGBT patients were more likely to have negative health care experiences in the past three years that caused their health to get worse and were less likely to seek care.[3] Lower income patients, as well as those who are younger, or are women, reportedly experience higher rates of discrimination and unfair treatment than older, male LGBT patients.

Avoiding Discrimination
Providers can take steps to make healthcare more inclusive for the LGBTQIA+ community, which includes lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals.

First, implementing an intake protocol to quickly identify LGBTQIA+ individuals can promote patient-centered care and foster an inclusive environment for all patients. For example, providers can include prompts such as gender history, sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex assigned at birth. Further, the method for collecting the information should be considered. Typically, utilizing a registration desk is least preferred by patients, however, other ideas include capturing information on paper or laminated forms with dry erase markers, electronic check-ins from the patient’s home, self-check-ins at the healthcare facility, or going over information in a private setting with a medical assistant, nurse, or other provider.

Additionally, gender and LGBTQIA+ status is considered protected health information (PHI) under HIPAA. Therefore, intake forms should include confidentiality and privacy language, and medical staff should be equipped to discuss HIPAA protections with patients to help them understand the security of their sensitive information.

Providers should also consider implementing training to identify and treat the unique health needs of LGBTQIA+ patients. Trainings can focus on improving patient-provider communication, enhancing patient-centered, compassionate care, and creating a safer and more inclusive environment.

The Joint Commission’s Field Guide recommends the following practices:

  1. Integrate unique LGBTQ+ patient needs into new policies or modify existing policies
  2. Review nondiscrimination and visitation policies, revise the definition of family
  3. Demonstrate ongoing commitment to inclusivity for LGBQT+ patients and families
  4. Develop a mechanism for reporting discrimination or disrespectful treatment[4]

Lastly, providers should ensure they are complying with local, state, and federal laws related to discrimination. Relevant federal laws to be aware of include the Public Health Services Act, which among other prohibitions, prohibits discrimination on the basis of age, race, color, national origin, disability, religion, or sex in programs, services, and activities funded by Preventative Health and Health Services Block Grants;[5] Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination against individuals on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age and disability in covered health programs or activities; and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires Medicare-participating hospitals with emergency departments to provide medical screening examinations to any individual who comes to the emergency department and requests examination, regardless of ability to pay or insured status.[6]

If you have any questions regarding caring for LGBTQIA+ patients and avoiding discrimination, please don’t hesitate to contact BMD Health Law Group Member Jeana M. Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001, or BMD Attorney Rachel Stermer at rcstermer@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2019.  

[1] Kaiser Family Foundation, “LGBT Adults’ Experiences with Discrimination and Health Care Disparities: Findings from the KFF Survey of Racism, Discrimination, and Health” (Apr. 2, 2024) https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/poll-finding/lgbt-adults-experiences-with-discrimination-and-health-care-disparities-findings-from-the-kff-survey-of-racism-discrimination-and-health/. 

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] The Joint Commission, “Meeting the Needs of the LGBTQ+ Community – Then and Now” (June 25, 2023) https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/news-and-multimedia/blogs/advancing-health-care-equity/2022/06/meeting-the-needs-of-the-lgbtq-community/#:~:text=The%20Joint%20Commission's%20Field%20Guide,policies%20or%20modify%20existing%20policies. 

[5] 42 USC § 300w-7.

[6] 42 USC § 1395dd.

LGBTQIA+Protecting LGBTQ CommunityHealth LawHealthcareJeana SingletonRachel Stermer
Client Alert

UPDATE - Vaccine Policy Considerations for Employers

January 4, 2021If you read our post from November, you’re already an informed employer. This first post of 2021 is to share good news, give a few updates, and answer some other common questions. Q: What’s the Good News? First, the EEOC confirmed that employers may require employees receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Second, polling indicates that the number of Americans who said they will receive a vaccine has increased from around 63% to over 71%. The number of Americans who are strongly opposed to a vaccine is about 27%. Third, initial returns show that the efficacy rate for certain vaccines is as high as 95% for some at-risk recipients.Client Alert

Changes to FFCRA Paid Leave: Congress’ Revisions to Employment COVID-19 Leave Benefits Signals the Light is at the End of the Tunnel

December 28, 2020Late in the evening on December 27th, President Trump signed into law the government’s $900 billion COVID-19 relief package (the “Stimulus Bill”). Among other economic stimulus benefits, the Stimulus Bill contains the $600 stimulus checks that will be issued to eligible individuals as well as, relevantly, changes to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). The FFCRA was implemented in April 2020 and provided benefits to individuals who missed work as a result of an actual or suspected COVID-19 illness or to care for a child when their school or childcare service was closed because of COVID-19. Importantly, the Stimulus Bill extends eligibility for employer payroll tax refunds for leave payments made to employees on or before March 31, 2021 under the FFCRA, signaling to the American people that Congress believes many of the employed public will be vaccinated by this time, the light at the end of the tunnel. However, the Stimulus Bill does contain a caveat that employers are no longer required to provide FFCRA leave benefits after December 31, 2020, but if they do, they will receive the payroll tax credits, up to the maximums provided in the FFCRA, for payments made prior to April 1, 2021. Below we provide a list of questions and answers we received to date following the passage of the Stimulus Bill. We expect the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) to issue additional questions and answers as the Stimulus Bill is implemented, and we will update this Client Alert as these are received.Client Alert

Healthcare Speaker Programs: New OIG Alert

December 11, 2020In a rare Special Fraud Alert issued on November 16, 2020 (the “Alert”), the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) urged companies who host speaker programs to reassess their programs in light of the “inherent risks” associated with these activities. The Alert reports that, in the last three years, drug and device companies have reported paying nearly $2 billion to health care professionals for speaker-related services.Client Alert

Value-Based Care Advances – CMS Issues New Final Rules for Stark and Anti-Kickback Statutes

December 11, 2020The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) issued two highly anticipated (and quite extensive) Final Rules to reform the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) regulations. The Final Rules generally take effect on January 19, 2021. The Final Rules include new safe harbors for the AKS and new exemptions to the Stark Law to allow for greater flexibility. According to the HHS, the goal of updating both laws is to make it easier for providers to engage in care coordination and value-based care programs without running afoul of the statutes. Please note that this client alert could not cover the full extent of the Final Rule changes so please contact your BMD Healthcare attorney with questions.Client Alert

Mandatory Filings Under CFIUS New Rules

December 11, 2020On September 15, 2020, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) promulgated a final rule modifying its mandatory declaration requirements for certain foreign investment transactions involving “TID US businesses” (sensitive U.S. businesses dealing in critical technologies, critical infrastructure and sensitive personal data) dealing in “critical technologies” – i.e., U.S. businesses that produce, design, test, manufacture, fabricate, or develop one or more critical technologies. The new rule also makes amendments to the definition of the term “substantial interest” (used to determine whether a foreign government has a substantial interest in an entity). The final rule became effective on October 15, 2020.
Older posts
Newer posts