Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Medicare Making Changes to Improve Behavioral Health Care Access

Client Alert

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently announced changes to Medicare beneficiaries’ ability to access behavioral health care.

Currently, Medicare covers psychiatric hospitalization for people with acute psychiatric needs, partial hospitalization program services, and outpatient mental health treatment and therapy services. As mental health diagnoses for Medicare-eligible Americans increase, there has been a notable gap in coverage for certain services and certain providers.

In response, Medicare has implemented the following changes:

  1. Permitting Marriage and Family Therapists and Mental Health Counselors (including alcohol and drug counselors who meet the Mental Health Counselor requirements) to independently enroll in Medicare. To date, these providers could not independently enroll as Medicare providers.
  2. Paying for Community Health Integration and Principal Illness Navigation services. Notably, CMS is permitting these services to be provided by community health workers and peer support specialists. These services are especially important for beneficiaries whose social needs (i.e., food, housing, and transportation) interfere with their receipt of health care.
  3. Changing the required level of supervision for behavioral health services performed at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs). Now, certain behavioral health services at FQHCs and RHCs can be provided with “general” supervision instead of “direct” supervision. Practically, this means that behavioral health providers can now provide certain vital services without a doctor or advanced practice practitioner physically present on-site.
  4. Increasing reimbursement for crisis psychotherapy services to 150% of the usual Physician Fee Schedule rate when crisis care is provided outside of health care settings (i.e., in the community).
  5. Increasing reimbursement for substance use disorder treatment provided in an office setting to better reflect the actual costs of the services.

These changes are part of the 2024 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, 2024 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Final Rule, and 2025 Proposed Medicare Advantage and Part D rules.

If you have questions about expanded Medicare coverage and what that means for your patients or organization, or Medicare coverage of behavioral health services, please contact Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Associate Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.


January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.

Immigration Orders and Their Economic Impact on Small Business: Insights from Attorney and Former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff

President Trump's recent executive orders, targeting immigration policies, could significantly impact small businesses in Ohio, particularly those owned by undocumented immigrants. With stricter visa vetting, halted refugee admissions, and potential deportations, these businesses face uncertainty, workforce disruption, and closures. Ohio's immigrant-owned businesses, especially in food services and transportation, contribute billions to the state economy, and any disruption could result in economic ripple effects.

Corporate Transparency Act Ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), lifting an injunction previously imposed by the Fifth Circuit. However, a separate nationwide injunction remains in effect, meaning businesses are still not required to comply with the CTA’s reporting requirements. FinCEN continues to accept voluntary reporting while enforcement remains paused.