Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Medicare Updates on Skin Substitutes: LCDs Withdrawn, Payment Changes Take Effect

Client Alert

Medicare coverage for skin substitutes has seen significant review over the past year. One notable change in coverage for skin substitutes was set to take effect on January 1, 2026, as indicated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) announcement released on December 15, 2025.

The announcement indicated that the Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”) were set to release updated Final LCDs for Skin Substitute Grafts/Cellular and Tissue-Based Products for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers. The announcement discussed three categories that the skin substitute products were organized into: (1) Coverage, including products that met the evidence threshold needed for coverage; (2) Non-Covered, including products that lacked submitted evidence showing that the products were “reasonable and necessary” and were without areas of ongoing relevant research; and (3) 12-Month Status Quo Period, indicating that products required further review due to ongoing research. In addition, the announcement listed 18 codes that the MACs identified as covered products, 154 codes subject to MAC discretion, and 158 codes identified as non-covered products.  

On December 24, 2025, CMS announced that the MACs withdrew the Final LCDs. Even though the final LCDs were ultimately withdrawn, the withdrawal is not dispositive of product coverage. Instead, previous coverage rules may still apply. In addition, the Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, which went into effect on January 1, 2026, changed payment for skin substitutes to a single payment rate of app. $127.14.

To learn more about Local Coverage Determinations and Payment Changes for Skin Substitutes, please contact BMD Vice President and Healthcare Member Amanda Waesch at alwaesch@bmdllc.com.     


Update on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Related Countries

USCIS has temporarily extended Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for certain Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries from Haiti and several other countries following recent court action. Employers and TPS recipients should review EAD expiration dates, monitor ongoing developments, and ensure compliance with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements.

HHS Accessibility Requirements for Medical Diagnostic Equipment: What Health Care Providers Need to Know

Health care providers that receive federal financial assistance are now subject to updated HHS accessibility requirements for medical diagnostic equipment under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. With the July 8, 2026, compliance deadline in effect, covered providers should ensure they have the required accessible equipment, train staff, and review operational practices to reduce compliance risk and provide accessible care for patients with disabilities.

Florida Super Lawyers® Recognizes Brennan Manna Diamond Attorneys to the 2026 Lists

BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND is proud to announce that three of our attorneys have been designated to the 2026 Florida Super Lawyers® and Florida Rising Stars® lists. Super Lawyers is based on multiple categories of independent research and peer evaluation to identify outstanding lawyers.

Supreme Court Clears Path for TPS Terminations: What Employers Need to Know

The U.S. Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 decision in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot removed legal obstacles that had delayed the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria. The ruling also reinforces the administration's authority to terminate other TPS designations currently under review. Employers should immediately identify workers whose employment authorization is tied to affected TPS programs, review Form I-9 records, and prepare for forthcoming USCIS guidance before taking any employment action.

The Risks of Outsourcing Medical Billing and the Importance of State-Law Compliance

Offshoring medical billing and other administrative functions can reduce costs, but it also raises significant compliance, operational, and contractual risks. Although HIPAA does not explicitly prohibit protected health information from being accessed or stored outside the United States, healthcare providers and their vendors remain responsible for safeguarding patient information and complying with state-specific restrictions that may limit or prohibit offshore subcontracting.