Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Metaverse in the Workplace: What Do Employers Need to Know?

Client Alert

Emerging technologies are creating a host of new legal issues for employers. The rise of the metaverse has been one of the most anticipated expansions over the last few years. The metaverse is a virtual world that allows users to interact with each other in simulated environments. The metaverse in the workplace has been expanding rapidly as businesses explore the use of virtual reality and augmented reality to improve workflows and communication.

What is the metaverse?  The metaverse is an immersive virtual world. With the use of virtual reality (VR) and/or augmented reality (AR), people can work, play, shop, collaborate, and socialize in a digital world. It is an expansive network of real-time 3D worlds where individuals exist through their avatars. Mark Zuckerberg has described it as a “virtual environment where you can be present with people in a digital space. An embodied Internet that you are inside of.”[1]

With the use of a VR headset, you are immersed in the virtual reality. With AR glasses, you can layer digital information on top of the real world. You can even wear haptic gloves where pressure pads will make it feel as though you are actually touching real objects in the virtual world.

What are the business applications of the metaverse?  While the metaverse is in its early stages of development, there are already several applications for businesses. Employers are using the metaverse for onboarding employees with virtual HR, training employees on processes or procedures through virtual games and tests, and for improving efficiency through the use of AI to support employee performance. The metaverse is also being used for immersive team building and collaboration. From a human capital standpoint, with the expansion of remote work, the metaverse boosts employee engagement as employees are present with the rest of the team in a digital world – regardless of where they all are in the real world.  Employees around the globe can meet through their avatars in the same digital meeting room and work on the same virtual whiteboard.

Metaverse developers are quickly expanding and refining its workforce applications and efficiencies.  It is anticipated that by 2030 5B people will interact in the metaverse and it will be an $8T-$13T industry.[2]  Bill Gates predicts that the metaverse will host most office meetings within two or three years.[3] 

What are the employment law issues of a metaverse workplace? The legal landscape of the metaverse is still unfolding, and much of the current law is related to intellectual property of platforms. However, as more and more businesses are using virtual worlds for trainings, meetings, and other work-related activities, legal issues have arisen.  The employment issues include:

  • Sexual Harassment: Yes, this is a major concern. The EEOC reports that sexual harassment victimizes one out of every four women in the workplace, and it would be foolhardy to think less harassment would take place in the metaverse. In fact, Facebook’s parent company Meta Platforms has already launched a tool to establish virtual personal space boundaries of 1.2 meters between avatars on its platforms to prevent sexual harassment and virtual groping.[4] Until other platforms follow suit, users with haptic gloves and vests can touch and be touched in the virtual world. Additionally, employees will be represented by their avatars, which can mask their identities during verbal harassment and bullying and make the ordinary reporting mechanisms less effective. When implementing or building a platform, the mechanisms to prevent sexual harassment should be an initial consideration for employers.
  • Jurisdiction: This can be a benefit for employers. Until further laws and regulations are inevitably passed, employers will have leeway in deciding which employment laws and regulations will apply to their metaverse workplace. Employers can decide where the platform is located (even internationally) and establish the terms and conditions of use and dispute resolution. A metaverse workspace may allow employers to expand their cultural diversity through hiring around the globe. In building the platform, employers must consider the employment laws, immigration issues, tax implications, and other regulatory concerns before determining the jurisdiction of the platform.   
  • Privacy and Cyber Security: Right now, this is a concern because employers will be collecting significant amounts of data about their employees. Employers must protect the privacy of that information internally and from third-party cyber-attacks. This concern is not overly complex today as each metaverse platform is a closed system. However, this concern will heighten as the metaverse becomes more interactive between platforms and allows users to carry digital information across platform boundaries. 
  • Digital Outsourcing: An anticipated benefit of the metaverse is improving efficiency of operations through artificial intelligence.(*)  Employers can create AI supervisors, advisors, and assistants. The digital supervisor can assign tasks, check for quality, and confirm completion. The digital advisor can be a real-time library of Q&A for your employees as they perform their tasks. The AI assistants can be assigned routine components of tasks while the employees perform the higher leverage and discretionary functions. Employers will need to juggle the potential reductions in workforces with the use of digital assets.    
  • Other Employment Laws: Stay tuned for developments across all areas. From the outset, employers have needed to implement reporting measures to ensure that non-exempt employees are tracking hours worked both in real world and in the metaverse. Because employees will be using digital hardware, employers may be presented with disability requests for accommodation on screens, headsets, usage time, and other impacts of the new technology. Additionally, with any new process or technology, employers can expect user error. If the user error statistically impacts certain protected classes of employees more than non-protected classes and results in adverse employment actions, then employers can be opened to disparate impact claims of discrimination. 
  • Policies and Procedures: Employees will be represented by their avatars in the metaverse. Their bodies, clothing, identities, and behaviors will be their virtual representations designed and implemented by them. This will create the need for a comprehensive suite of policies and procedures in the metaverse.

The metaverse is an opportunity for employers and its technology is evolving. As it evolves, the legal and regulatory issues will continue to develop. For additional information on the metaverse, its implementation in your workplace, or any questions or concerns, please contact Jeffrey C. Miller, jcmiller@bmdllc.com 216-658-2323, or any member of the BMD L+E team.

(*) Note from Jeffrey:  Using artificial intelligence is not limited to the metaverse.  I used an open-source artificial intelligence tool to create a substantial portion of this article.    

[1] https://deadline.com/2021/07/mark-zuckerbergs-metaverse-facebooks-augmented-reality-oculus-1234801863/

[2] https://internationalbanker.com/technology/what-exactly-is-the-metaverse/

[3] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/09/bill-gates-metaverse-will-host-most-virtual-meetings-in-a-few-years.html

[4] https://techxplore.com/news/2022-02-meta-personal-boundary-tool-virtual.html


Florida's Recent Ruling on Arbitration Clauses

Florida’s recent ruling on arbitration clauses provides a crucial distinction in determining whether such clauses are void as against public policy and providers may have the opportunity to include arbitration clauses in their patient consent forms. On March 6, 2024, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Florida’s Fifteenth Circuit Court ruling of Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson. The Court of Appeals ruled that the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contradict the Legislature’s intent of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “MMA”), but rather reflects the parties’ choice to arbitrate claims entirely outside of the MMA’s framework. Therefore, the Court found that the agreement was not void as against public policy.

Corporate Transparency Act Update 3/14/24

On March 1, 2024, a federal district court in the Northern District of Alabama concluded that the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) exceeded Congressional powers and enjoined the Department of the Treasury from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs. National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.). On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice appealed the district court’s decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Ohio State University Launches Its Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program

In response to Ohio’s nursing shortage, The Ohio State University College of Nursing is accepting applications for its new Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing program (aBSN). Created for students with a bachelor’s degree in non-nursing fields, the aBSN allows such students to obtain their nursing degree within 18 months. All aBSN students will participate in high-quality coursework and gain valuable clinical experience. Upon completion of the program, graduates will be eligible to take the State Board, National Council of Licensure Exam for Registered Nursing (NCLEX-RN).

Another Transparency Obligation: The FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

Many physician practices and healthcare businesses are facing a new set of federal transparency requirements that require action now. The U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements (the “Rule”), which was promulgated pursuant to the 2021 bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act, is intended to help curb illegal finance and other impermissible activity in the United States.

“In for a Penny, in for a Pound” is No Longer the Case for Florida Lawyers

On April 1, 2024, newly adopted Rule 1.041 to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures goes into effect which creates a procedure for an attorney to appear in a limited manner in civil proceedings.  Currently, when a Florida attorney appears in a civil proceeding, he or she is reasonable for handling all aspects of the case for their client.  This new rule authorizes an attorney to file a notice limiting the attorney’s appearance to particular proceedings or specified matters prior to any appearance before the court.  For example, an attorney can now appear for the limited purpose of filing and arguing a motion to dismiss.  Once the motion to dismiss is heard by the court, the attorney may file a notice of termination of limited appearance and will have no further obligations in the case.