Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

New Construction Contract Requirement for Public Projects

Client Alert

A new Ohio law imposes a disclosure requirement that will affect how public authorities prepare construction contracts—and what happens if they do not comply.

Construction contract negotiations typically begin with an industry standard form agreement. Common examples include the American Institute of Architects (AIA) forms and ConsensusDocs.

Ohio Senate Bill 262 takes effect on September 17, 2026. Under the new law, when a public authority modifies an industry standard form agreement, it must show those changes using strikethrough and underline formatting. If the public authority fails to mark these changes, the modifications are void, and the original standard form language governs.

While industry standards can assist in streamlining negotiations, each construction project comes with its own unique risks and considerations that might call for deviations, small or large, from the “standard” language. More importantly, deviations from standard language are typically negotiated for significant reasons—making compliance with this new marking requirement essential.

For assistance negotiating your next construction contract or implementing procedures to comply with this new requirement, please contact BMD Member Bob Hager at rahager@bmdllc.com or BMD Attorney Jacob Davis at jrdavis@bmdllc.com.


ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.