Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

New Ohio Reporting Requirements for Non-Residential Contractors

Client Alert

Effective March 19, 2026, nonresidential construction companies must verify the employment eligibility of each employee hired to perform work on a project throughout the State of Ohio. Ohio’s E-Verify Workforce Integrity Act (the “Act”) requires E-Verify participation for nonresidential construction companies, subcontractors, and labor brokers for nonresidential construction.

E-Verify is a records maintenance portal that allows confirmation of employment eligibility by comparing information entered by the employer to records available to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. E-Verify will not replace current reporting databases that companies already utilize; it will be an additional, required submission by the employer.

The Act mandates participation by companies that complete nonresidential projects in the State of Ohio regardless of their employee count. The Act defines a nonresidential construction project as “the construction or renovation of any building, highway, bridge, utility, or related infrastructure.” Importantly, contractors constructing industrialized units, manufactured homes, residential buildings or mobile homes will not fall within the purview of the Act.

The Ohio Attorney General is entrusted with the enforcement of the Act. Penalties for violations range between $250 and $25,000, with such monetary penalty possibly accompanied by an order rendering the contractor ineligible to bid or participate in any future state contract for a period of two (2) years.

There are competing interpretations of the Act surrounding whether a contractor must create E-Verify cases for existing employees whose work authorization is subject to reverification under federal law. Definitive guidance has not been provided as of the date of this Client Alert, but construction companies are encouraged to seek formal guidance on how to ensure compliance with Act.

For questions regarding Ohio’s E-Verify Workforce Integrity Act and how your business should prepare for these new requirements, please do not hesitate to contact BMD Member Bob Hager at rahager@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jacob Davis at jrdavis@bmdllc.com.


Will Student-Athlete Collectives Survive NIL Changes?

By July 2025 the landscape of student-athlete funding will look nothing like the current landscape, so preparing now is a must. If you are a student-athlete, the parent of a student-athlete, a university/college, or “booster”, it behooves you to understand these evolving issues.

Ohio's Recent Rule Changes to Administration of Immunizations, Outpatient Pharmacy Delivery, and Mobile Response Services

The Ohio Board of Pharmacy (“BOP”) and Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“OMHAS”) recently posted notices of Ohio Administrative Code rule changes related to the administration of immunizations (BOP), outpatient pharmacy delivery services (BOP), and mobile response and stabilization services (OMHAS).

HOA Construction Project Do’s and Don’ts

Local regulators can approve new construction, but if a resident contacts their homeowners association there may be trouble. Fences, yard alterations, and backyard decks do not have to be such a hassle and a point of conflict. Find out general Do’s and Don’ts to help HOA residents avoid issues in this article by BMD Partner Scott Heasley.

New Ohio Recovery Housing Rules Take Effect January 1, 2025

Ohio’s new recovery housing rules, effective January 1, 2025, require certified community behavioral health providers to refer clients only to accredited recovery housing residences listed on the statewide registry.

SCOTUS to Weigh In on Medicaid Beneficiaries’ Right to Choose their Provider

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments this spring on whether Medicaid beneficiaries have an enforceable right to choose their healthcare providers without state interference, as outlined in Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act. This case stems from a South Carolina petition challenging a Fourth Circuit ruling that blocked the state from terminating Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid provider agreement.