Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

OSHA and COVID-19: Workplace Exposures, Citations and Recording

Client Alert

Employer Safety & Health Recommendations, Potential Citations, and Recording Workplace Exposures

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued guidance for protecting employees against workplace exposures to COVID-19.  Employers should also be aware of OSHA standards which may apply to workplace exposures and when a case of COVID-19 is OSHA recordable.

OSHA Guidance
OSHA has issued its Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19.  The Guidance sets forth strategies for minimizing workplace exposures.  Note that the Guidance is not an OSHA standard or regulation and does not create new legal obligations on the part of employers.  However, it provides both practical advice for protecting employees and some insight as to when OSHA may issue a General Duty Clause citation in the event of a recordable case of COVID-19 (see Citations below).

OSHA recommends that employers assess the risk level for each job classification, taking into consideration an employee’s contact or close proximity with co-workers, the general public, and those at higher risk for infection, among other factors.  It is recommended that the employer then classify each job according to the following hierarchy:

Lower Exposure Risk (Caution):  Jobs that do not require contact with persons known or suspected to be infected, or frequent close contact (within 6 feet) with the general public.  Most employers will fall into this category.

Medium Exposure Risk:  Jobs that require frequent or close contact with persons who may be infected with the virus but are not known or suspected COVID-19 patients.  This category includes employees having frequent contact with international travelers or working in communities with ongoing COVID-19 transmission.

High Exposure Risk:  Jobs with high potential for exposure to known or suspected sources of COVID-19, such as healthcare workers.

Very High Exposure Risk:  Jobs with high potential for exposure to known or suspected sources of COVID-19 during specific medical, postmortem, or laboratory procedures.

For all employers, OSHA recommends, in order of effectiveness, various engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment.  Additional proactive measures are recommended depending upon the risk classification.  Employers should also have contingency plans for workplace outbreaks.

OSHA Standards
Though no OSHA standard specifically covers COVID-19, there are a number of existing standards which may apply to mitigating workplace exposures, as follows:

Personal Protective Equipment:  Applicable PPE standards may include hand, eye, and face protection, as well as respiratory protection.  When respiratory protection is necessary to protect employees, a respiratory protection program must be implemented.  OSHA-mandated workplace hazard assessments should be reviewed and revised as necessary in light of employee exposure risks.

Bloodborne Pathogens:  This standard may apply to occupations where there is reasonably anticipated contact with human blood or “other potentially infectious materials.”  The latter term typically does not include general workplace exposure to others’ respiratory secretions (i.e., co-worker sneezes and coughs), but in such cases, the Bloodborne Pathogen Standard may provide additional guidance to employers for identifying exposure risks and implementing safety measures.

Hazard Communication:  Though perhaps not an ordinary concern for most employers, the Hazard Communication Standard may come into play for employees now using cleaners, sanitizers, or sterilizers for workplace mitigation of COVID-19 exposure.

General Duty Clause:  Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, better known as the General Duty Clause, requires employers to “furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm” to its employees.  The General Duty Clause is a catch-all requirement which provides OSHA with enforcement power when no specific safety or health standard applies to a given workplace hazard.

Note that 28 states have a state agency, as opposed to federal OSHA, which enforces workplace safety and health standards.  Most such states adopt the federal OSHA standards in whole (or close to it), but some, such as California, have adopted a broad range of standards unique to the state.  Employers in so-called “state-plan states” should keep abreast of state standards and guidance applicable to COVID-19.

Citations
A workplace injury or illness is not a prerequisite for the issuance of an OSHA citation, as an employer’s violation of any safety or health standard can lead to a citation.  However, as it applies to COVID-19, both an OSHA inspection and citation are unlikely absent extraordinary circumstances, such as an employer’s failure to undertake any precautions to protect against workplace exposures followed by a workplace outbreak of COVID-19.  In such a case, a citation alleging one or more violations of the standards identified above, and the General Duty Clause in particular, is possible.

Recording a COVID-19 Illness
Employers must record work-related illnesses on their OSHA 300 logs.  COVID-19 can be a recordable illness if an employee is infected during the performance of work-related duties.  However, the fact that an employee is diagnosed with COVID-19 and/or first experiences symptoms at work does not make the case recordable.  As with any injury or illness, the case is not recordable unless it is: (i) work-related; (ii) a new case; and (3) results in death, missed or restricted work, job transfer, or medical treatment beyond first aid, or constitutes “a significant injury or illness diagnosed by a physician or other licensed health care professional.”

With the widespread transmission of COVID-19 and the many non-work related avenues for exposure, it is unlikely that an isolated case or two of COVID-19 in a workplace could be fairly characterized as “work-related” (the first of the above three criteria).  Thus, it is unlikely that the employer would have to record the case on its OSHA 300 log.  By contrast, if there is a workplace outbreak among several or more employees who are in close contact with each other, OSHA may consider the cases to be work-related and, therefore, recordable if the second and third criteria are also met.

As a final point, a COVID-19 case is not recordable unless it is a “laboratory-confirmed” case.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed a classification system for reporting and tracking the virus, as follows:

Person Under Investigation (PUI):  Having sufficient symptoms to cause a healthcare provider to conduct testing.

Presumptive Positive:  At least one respiratory specimen that tested positive for the virus that causes COVID-19 at a state or local laboratory.

Laboratory Confirmed:  At least one respiratory specimen that tested positive for the virus that causes COVID-19 at a CDC laboratory.

If an employer’s case is not a “laboratory-confirmed” case, the employer need not inquire further whether the case is recordable – it is not.

For questions or more information, please contact Stephen Matasich at sematasich@bmdllc.com or 330.253.9146, or any member of the BMD Employment & Labor group.


New OSHA Guidance for Workplaces Not Covered by the Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard

On June 10, 2021, OSHA issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for occupational exposure to COVID-19, but it applies only to healthcare and healthcare support service workers. For a detailed summary of the ETS applicable to the healthcare industry, please visit https://youtu.be/vPyXmKwOzsk. All employers not subject to the ETS should review OSHA’s contemporaneously released, updated Guidance on Mitigating and Preventing the Spread of COVID-19 in the Workplace. The new Guidance essentially leaves intact OSHA’s earlier guidance, but only for unvaccinated and otherwise at-risk workers (“at-risk” meaning vaccinated or unvaccinated workers with immunocompromising conditions). For fully vaccinated workers, OSHA defers to CDC Guidance for Fully Vaccinated People, which advises that most fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing masks or physically distancing, except where required by federal, state, or local laws or individual business policies.

Employer Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

As employers encourage or require employees to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, they should be aware of OSHA recording obligations and potential workers’ compensation liability. Though OSHA has yet to revise its COVID-19 guidance in response to the latest CDC recommendations, OSHA has revised its position regarding the recording of injury or illness resulting from the vaccine. Until now, OSHA required an employer to record an adverse reaction when the vaccine was required for employees and the injury or illness otherwise met the recording criteria (work-related, a new case, and meets one or more of the general recording criteria). OSHA has reversed course and announced that it will not require recording adverse reactions until at least May 2022, irrespective of whether the employer requires the vaccine as a condition of employment. In its revised COVID-19 FAQs, OSHA states:

The New Rule 1.510 - Radical Change for Summary Judgement Procedure in Florida

In civil litigation, where both sides participate actively, trial is usually required at the end of a long, expensive case to determine a winner and a loser. In federal and most state courts, however, there are a few procedural shortcuts by which parties can seek to prevail in advance of trial, saving time, money and annoyance. The most common of these is the “motion for summary judgment”: a request to the court by one side for judgment before trial, generally on the basis that the evidence available reflects that a win for that party is legally inevitable and thus required. Effective May 1, 2021, summary judgment procedure in Florida has radically changed.

Vacating, Modifying or Correcting an Arbitration Award Under R.C. 2711.13: Three-Month Limitation Maximum; Not Guaranteed Amount of Time

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. R.C. 2711.13 provides that “after an award in an arbitration proceeding is made, any party to the arbitration may file a motion in the court of common pleas for an order vacating, modifying, or correcting the award.” Any such motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award “must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is delivered to the parties in interest.” In BST Ohio Corporation et al. v. Wolgang, the Court held the three-month period set forth in R.C. 2711.13 is not a guaranteed time period in which to file a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award. 2021-Ohio-1785.

EEOC Provides Updated Guidance Regarding Employer COVID-19 Vaccine Policies

On May 28, 2021, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission updated its guidance regarding employer COVID-19 vaccination policies. The new guidance provides much-needed clarification of expectations for employers seeking to promote workplace safety and prevent the spread of COVID-19, including discussion of mandatory vaccination policies, voluntary vaccination incentives, and accommodation of employees based on disability or sincerely held religious beliefs. The full text of the update is found in Section K of the EEOC’s COVID Q&A document. You can also learn more about these and other developments from BMD's Bryan Meek and Monica Andress through the Employment Law After Hours YouTube channel, available here.